Dieing Relatively

To die relatively is to be dead as seen from one frame of riferrance while being alife as seen from another frame! The idea that death is relative was one of those that came to my head two years ago when I sought to find different ways immortality can be achieved. An example of a relative death is the one 'experienced' by schrodinger cat who might be leaving in some parallel universes. It is experiencing what is termed quantum immortality. So scientists have come up with their own fashion of immortality!What seems to have eluded physicists is that even Einstein's theory of relativity implies that death, alongside mass, length, time etc is relative! So I add yet another mind bending paradox in the basket. This is for simple reason that the moving observer is flattened one side. Infact, he is completely flat, like a pan cake when very near the speed of light! The the guy get so much obese that he might weigh a couple of tones! Of course such a guy is better termed dead because there is no such a leaving being weighing tones and completely flattened.Before we proceed, let us close exermine how we term dieing. We say someone has passed away. Consider similar language when saying a train might pass away. According to the observer in the train, it is you who has infact 'passed away'! So during death the victim might as well be experiencing nothing happening to him. Rather it is the rest of the world that is dieing!To begine understanding how death can be relative, consider how temperature is relative. Put your right index fingure near a hot place while putting your left index fingure in a cold place, say deep in water. Then suddenly, deep the right fingure in the cold water. What you realise is that the the water feels far colder to the right fingure than it is to the left fingure! But this is remarkable because temperature, like say the state of being dead is better termed a scalar. Motion is a vector. However, we see some very close analogy between the scalar and the vector. Consider the symmetry: if you are moving near the speed of the comoving object, then the comoving object seems to move at a slow pase from your point of view. If your temperature is nearly as hot as the object you are touching, you don't feel the object as though hot or cold from your point of 'view'.Considering the temperature the way physicists do, i.e relate it to particles moving around randomly in all manner of directions, then we understand how death can be relative. To get the rough idea, consider that if your temperature rise upto say 40¤, it is enough to kill you. But I storm in and say tut tut tut! Relative to what is the temperature 40¤? It is relative to the temperature of our ether with its own value of zero point energy. So we say if particles in system A are dancing around violently then from a point of view of system B, whose all particles are all at stand still, the system A is a lots high temperature. But consider som other system C that is related to A such that for every moving particle in A there is a coresponding particle moving synchronously as A. Then from the point of view of system C, system A is perfectly still. It is system A that is churning around. It is an exceedingly generalised theory of relativity. Latter, I will illustrate how the existence of negative energy implys that we should think that narture is capable of achieving the above synchronicity.Now the theory of general relativity view space as some ether. It is possible to view it as something immersed in some bigger space. Quantum mechanics demands that when we quantise such an ether, we view it as any other ocean, with its particles cabable of dansing around! So we have particles of locations. With this, we should form a completely different way of understanding stillness or motionlessness. Motion is relative to ether. The ether itself is as dynamic as any other ocean. So a still thing is just something dancing synchronously with ether! The point is it doesn't matter how chaotic the ocean might be as seen from the external view; outside of the universe. So for death to be relative, we only need layers of such ethers. One such an ether, for instance, might be boiling with a million degrees celcius. But similarly hot guys will leave comfortably in such place! A good analogy that might help you goes this way: if you move you eye ball slightly with your fingure, the outer world will begine to dance. However, if the outer world was to dance at synch with you eye movement, it will look perfectly still! Now consider a case where your eye vibrates so rapidly that you can nolonger see anything at all. Then another world vibrating at that high frequency will begine to appear! It is just like that you cannot see a bullet moving past you but if you move with its speed, you will surely see it cause it will stand still from your point of view.Negative energy also illustrate what I am saying above. What does a negative of energy realy mean? If you think it is simple to understand it, then probably you don't realy understand energy. In maths, it is quite simple. We just add a minus sign to an equation. In physics, it is much more a coffee time. The way I try to understand it is by beginning noticing that when the negative energy sum up with the positive energy, they cancel! But I understand enery as just some exeedingly tiny, perharps infinitesimal particles that are moving around randomly in all manner of directions. Let us say such particles in some system A has a positive energy with respect to system B. Then for every particle in A moving in a given direction at a given time, there is a corresponding particle in system B moving at exactly the oposite direction at that time! So system B forms a perfect mirror image of system A all the time. Should the two systems interact, all the coresponding particle would colide head on all comming to a stand still! To underpin what I was saying, we say if there can be a perfect mirrow image of an apparently chaotic system, why can't there be a perfect copy of one? Then a system with particles moving randomly in all manner of directions will look like a perfectly still system from the point of view of its perfect copy.

"Well, the word ego is often misused and one thinks of the modern psychiatry, in this regard....In reality, it is an apt definition, which derives from the Latin; "I." We can suggest the "I AM." So, the esotericist views the word differently to the…"

"Well, this Solarian transformation will always invoke the Hermetic axiom, in practice, which states; "AS ABOVE, SO BELOW...!!" The vast fleets of Elohim, time lords, GFL fleets, Arch-angels, et al, will be spiritually activated by Lord Surea, to the…"

"great to hear that Drekx and I applaud to you Movella, one day I will understand the significance of that, thank you

How long will it take for the Elohim to restore Solaris' Planetary System, with all the changes that will be accomplished, Drekx?"

Spiritual Blogs

Dieing Relatively

Comments

Featured Blogs

Calm In The Midst Of The Storm

Book: ASHTAR – A Tribute Compiled by Tuella

The Fiery Forces Of Creation Are Sweeping The Earth - June 22th, 2022

Interdimensional Being: Where Do You Consciously Reside?

Note: this page contains paid content.

Latest Activity

New Forum Posts

How To Let Go Of Your Emotions By Melanie Beckler

FrankenSkies documentary exposes the chemtrail agenda and its effects on life on Earth

Dr. Naomi Wolf Joins Alex Jones And Exposes The Globalist Blueprint To End Humanity-THE COVID JAB NEUTERS HUMANS

Follow Your Loving Heart To Higher Pathways of Living By Blossom Goodchild & The Federation of Light

Note: this page contains paid content.