Spiritual Forum

Top-earning doctors milk their patients for every dollar possible, research shows

Posted by Krishna Kalki on January 1, 2015 at 1:10am in Food, Health and Nutrition
(NaturalNews) After examining what Medicare was billed versus what it paid to clinicians, researchers from the UCLA Department of Urology and the Veterans' Health Administration discovered what has been described as "very surprising." Based on their findings, it would appear that they've stumbled upon the reason why some high-earning physicians are making top dollar: Quite simply, it is because they're pushing more services per patient than they are actually treating them or seeing new patients.(1)Could this explain the frustrations that many patients feel when some medical professionals hastily offer them a new service, rather than taking the time to fully assess their condition?"With clinicians making more not by seeing more unique patients, but by providing more services per person, additional research needs to be done to determine if these additional services are contributing to improved quality of care," said Dr. Jonathan Bergman, first author of the letter that details the discovery. "These findings suggest that the current health care reimbursement model -- fee-for-service -- may not be creating the correct incentives for clinicians to keep their patients healthy. Fee-for-service may not be the most reasonable way to reimburse physicians."(1)Dr. Bergman is also a urologist and bioethicist at the Veterans' Health Administration-Greater Los Angeles as well an assistant professor of urology and family medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.Compromising quality healthcareThe letter, titled "Service Intensity and Physician Income: Conclusions From Medicare's Physician Data Release," was published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. The letter states the following:These data indicate that higher-earning physicians earn more not by treating more patients but by offering more services per beneficiary. The relationship between these additional services and any meaningful improvement in outcomes is undefined. ... In Medicare's fee-for-service system, some physicians are collecting large fees by ordering services munificently.(2)It also suggests that the fee-for-service model may not be ideal, raising the question of whether or not it could jeopardize the level of care that a patient receives:For instance, advising a patient that she does not need a computed tomographic scan often takes more skill and time, and may represent higher quality of care, than ordering a scan or performing a service.(2)According to Medicare.gov, Original Medicare coverage consists of Part A and Part B. The website explains that Part A pertains to things like hospital care, hospice and home health services. Part B, according to the site, primarily covers that which is deemed medically necessary, such as "Services or supplies that are needed to diagnose or treat your medical condition and that meet accepted standards of medical practice."(3,4) It is data from Part B which was studied by the UCLA researchers and what led them to express their concerns in the published letter."Our findings suggest a weakness in fee-for-service medicine," said Dr. Bergman. "Perhaps it would make more sense to reimburse clinicians for providing high quality care, or for treating more patients. There probably shouldn't be such wide variation in services for patients being treated for the same conditions."(1)Is the fee-for-service model synonymous with excessive expenditures and fraud?The fee-for-service model also raises questions about potential fraud and less-than-ethical billing habits.For example, Charles Hugh Smith wrote in a DailyFinance article that the model oozes with eyebrow-raising techniques. He explains an instance in which his mother had a one-hour foot procedure that required local anesthetic and that the $2,000 recovery room fee seemed awfully steep for what was comprised of her sitting in a chair while waiting to be taken home. Recovery rooms, he says, are meant for those who were given general anesthesia, not for people who had a local anesthetic.(5)So, what's Smith getting at?"The point here isn't whether this particular fee met Medicare guidelines; the point is that the fee-for-service model provides powerful incentives to pad bills or even commit fraud," he wrote. "Indeed, poor medical practices net providers more money. According to a recent report, only 3% of the millions of charges submitted to Medicare are reviewed, and over 10% of Medicare's $453 billion in annual expenditures are outright fraud."(5)He also explains that these "perverse incentives" don't help patients make wise decisions, such as whether or not they should opt out of unnecessary procedures or pursue more affordable services. "It's like going to an auto mechanic and agreeing to pay for whatever services he deems necessary, at whatever price he chooses, with no penalties to the provider if the service is poor."(5)Sources:(1) http://www.newswise.com(2) http://archinte.jamanetwork.com(3) http://www.medicare.gov(4) http://www.medicare.gov(5) http://www.dailyfinance.comLearn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/048150_doctors_medical_fraud_healthcare_fees.html#ixzz3NWoIIWfK
Views: 7

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Email me when people reply –
Follow

Replies

  • Krishna Kalki January 1, 2015 at 1:26am
    What Doctors on the fiddle ? They have been for ages ...if they cure you then they lost control of you and lost their income ...they give you medicine that has side effects so your life is in their hands and you are under their control..they are more cunning then foxes.
    One in Three patients undergo surgery or have body parts removed that was not really necessary plus one in five patients die under evil doctors treatments
This reply was deleted.

Latest Discussion

Most Popular Discussion

Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"Thanks for the X22..👌🏼"
10 minutes ago
Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"I agree with the fact that he exposed the vax and reached an audience.. and others also exposed it too, we and many others already knew about it.. Like I said, he speaks both truths and untruths.."
16 minutes ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"And many less well known people, with medical backgrounds, provided testimony against the covid vaxx.....Many were cancelled and shadow banned....AJ "thinks" he a unique oracle of truth, when he is a lesser player than he would like to be..
True…"
16 minutes ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"No, I get it-but he did expose the scamdemic through deep state meeting white papers and the clot shots early on and disseminated that info -he also had Dr Boyle, a Harvard virologist, on his show multiple times who said the clot shots were untested…"
35 minutes ago
Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"AJ doesn’t really know any personal secrets about dark cabal individuals.. He is not in the Earth alliance and yet he tends to claim all credit for public info, in order to boost his own profile.. He is also not always accurate, some of the scandals…"
41 minutes ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"I know what you guys think about A Jones, but he has been exposing those scandals for decades and won't do any outdoor speaking venues."
47 minutes ago
AlternateEarth commented on AlternateEarth's blog post VIDEO: Your Robot Replacement Is Already Here, Warns Electrician Working At Elon Musk's Tesla Factory
"do you think his flse flag accusations-crisis actors who were at other mass murder scenes, on film, and other anomalies should be looked at and talked about? And after every mass shooting, up to recently the marxists/dem start ranting about stricter…"
50 minutes ago
Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"A combination of secret information about individuals within the group.. You know, the usual scandals; mass murderers, pedos, satanists, agendas, which he wanted to expose.. He also influenced the younger generations in both the left and the right…"
51 minutes ago
More…

New Blog Posts