Back in the 1930s, Henry Ford is supposed to have remarked that it was a good thing that most Americans didn't know how banking really works, because if they did, "there'd be a revolution before tomorrow morning".

Last week, something remarkable happened. The Bank of England let the cat out of the bag. In a paper called "Money Creation in the Modern Economy", co-authored by three economists from the Bank's Monetary Analysis Directorate, they stated outright that most common assumptions of how banking works are simply wrong, and that the kind of populist, heterodox positions more ordinarily associated with groups such as Occupy Wall Street are correct. In doing so, they have effectively thrown the entire theoretical basis for austerity out of the window.

To get a sense of how radical the Bank's new position is, consider the conventional view, which continues to be the basis of all respectable debate on public policy. People put their money in banks. Banks then lend that money out at interest – either to consumers, or to entrepreneurs willing to invest it in some profitable enterprise. True, the fractional reserve system does allow banks to lend out considerably more than they hold in reserve, and true, if savings don't suffice, private banks can seek to borrow more from the central bank.

The central bank can print as much money as it wishes. But it is also careful not to print too much. In fact, we are often told this is why independent central banks exist in the first place. If governments could print money themselves, they would surely put out too much of it, and the resulting inflation would throw the economy into chaos. Institutions such as the Bank of England or US Federal Reserve were created to carefully regulate the money supply to prevent inflation. This is why they are forbidden to directly fund the government, say, by buying treasury bonds, but instead fund private economic activity that the government merely taxes.

It's this understanding that allows us to continue to talk about money as if it were a limited resource like bauxite or petroleum, to say "there's just not enough money" to fund social programmes, to speak of the immorality of government debt or of public spending "crowding out" the private sector. What the Bank of England admitted this week is that none of this is really true. To quote from its own initial summary: "Rather than banks receiving deposits when households save and then lending them out, bank lending creates deposits" … "In normal times, the central bank does not fix the amount of money in circulation, nor is central bank money 'multiplied up' into more loans and deposits."

In other words, everything we know is not just wrong – it's backwards. When banks make loans, they create money. This is because money is really just an IOU. The role of the central bank is to preside over a legal order that effectively grants banks the exclusive right to create IOUs of a certain kind, ones that the government will recognise as legal tender by its willingness to accept them in payment of taxes. There's really no limit on how much banks could create, provided they can find someone willing to borrow it. They will never get caught short, for the simple reason that borrowers do not, generally speaking, take the cash and put it under their mattresses; ultimately, any money a bank loans out will just end up back in some bank again. So for the banking system as a whole, every loan just becomes another deposit. What's more, insofar as banks do need to acquire funds from the central bank, they can borrow as much as they like; all the latter really does is set the rate of interest, the cost of money, not its quantity. Since the beginning of the recession, the US and British central banks have reduced that cost to almost nothing. In fact, with "quantitative easing" they've been effectively pumping as much money as they can into the banks, without producing any inflationary effects.

What this means is that the real limit on the amount of money in circulation is not how much the central bank is willing to lend, but how much government, firms, and ordinary citizens, are willing to borrow. Government spending is the main driver in all this (and the paper does admit, if you read it carefully, that the central bank does fund the government after all). So there's no question of public spending "crowding out" private investment. It's exactly the opposite.

Why did the Bank of England suddenly admit all this? Well, one reason is because it's obviously true. The Bank's job is to actually run the system, and of late, the system has not been running especially well. It's possible that it decided that maintaining the fantasy-land version of economics that has proved so convenient to the rich is simply a luxury it can no longer afford.

But politically, this is taking an enormous risk. Just consider what might happen if mortgage holders realised the money the bank lent them is not, really, the life savings of some thrifty pensioner, but something the bank just whisked into existence through its possession of a magic wand which we, the public, handed over to it.

Historically, the Bank of England has tended to be a bellwether, staking out seeming radical positions that ultimately become new orthodoxies. If that's what's happening here, we might soon be in a position to learn if Henry Ford was right.

Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2014 Q1 (pdf)

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/18/truth-money-iou-bank-of-england-austerity

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Good article, good title, yes absolutely. I suggest buying and reading "Money grows on the tree of knowledge" and then selling it aftewards, it you want the money back. Excellent book that dives into Alchemy, the history of it's money, and how the entire economy is fueled by child sacrifice both metaphorical and literal.

    You cannot serve God and mammon. Money is opposite to everything is decent and wholesome. Scientific advacnements are held back, such as free energy, because of profit. They are holding back the future with the damned dam of money. Instead of real merit, people are obligated to give you anything for the measured devotion to the system you demonstrate, but will anyone give me a cheeseburger for being devoted and well learned in the ways of God?

This reply was deleted.

Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
2 hours ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"Nostradamus claimed that the last pope will have the surname Francis-the last one took the name Francis after the saint."
2 hours ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"Starmer was quick about it- good for the people of the UK and the US-finally"
2 hours ago
Coralie posted a blog post
Stick a Technology Tag on your Phone, TV & Computer to upgrade them and deflect harmful frequencies. Check them out here https://www.lightquest-intl.com/gallery-1/ and scroll down towards the bottom of the page. 
5 hours ago
Love & Joy posted a discussion
  The Magic Of Being Aligned & Rooted With May 2025 Energy Forecast By Emmanuel Dagher May will offer us an invitation to remember the magic that happens when we come into true alignment with ourselves, with the Earth, and with Life itself....After…
5 hours ago
Malcolm posted a blog post
A basic conclusion is at the end for the uninitiated. To those of you having lunch in D.C. this Monday (from 12 pm to 1 pm), be careful what you eat. The Moon rules the stomach in medical astrology, and I have noticed periods of nausea and bad…
7 hours ago
Drekx Omega commented on Drekx Omega's blog post One Rebel Star Should Fall From The EU Flag's Circular Constellation and Rise Anew With Greater and Brighter Light
"Taigar vin segarin..(Sirian for; day of victory) - ✌️🥳…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ifYN-ajnLY"
11 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Taigar vin segarin..(Sirian for; day of victory) - ✌️🥳…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ifYN-ajnLY"
11 hours ago
More…