Friends,
For anyone on ACC, who is still skeptical about the reality of ET and cosmic civillisations I recommend research of the Rendlesham UFO case in particular, which offers much objective evidence to support it, along with professional eye-witness testimony...
To wet the investigative appetite I have placed a few pointers for you, above....Including the critical Lt. Col. Charles Halt tape and supporting Halt memo.
I have also provided several blogs already, which provide details of the case from the GFL perspective, something that has not been accomplished before...BUT, here I seek to simply place the earth human witness experiences, for your consideration and hopefully, further investigation.
Recently I have noticed an increase in disbelief of the ET reality, by certain salient and active contributors to ACC....Hopefully, by opening up details of the Rendlesham case I can offer some real assurance that ET is real and benign and indeed, has mercifully saved the planet from nuclear annihilation, without much in the way of planetary fanfare...
Obviously members will not simply believe in a subject, simply because a "channel" or telepath contactee, speaks frankly about it.....Nobody has to take my word for it, but I KNOW that the subject is real...I sincerely understand sceptics, who seek objective proof....Noting, however, that even when genuine contactees offer it, they are ridiculed as fake...One remembers Billy Meier's plentiful objective proof, which was believed in some quarters of serious and open-minded researchers, but dismissed by the rest...His family suffered much, as he went public. His son found his school life to be unbearable, because of the ridicule his father suffered. Attempts were even made on the lives of the Meiers.
Thus, modern contactees have been briefed by their GFL flight crew counterparts, not to present close-up shots of craft, nor photos of ET personnel....BUT, "UFO" cases, such as Rendlesham, involving "ordinary" people, have more than enough evidence from military witnesses.
Like policemen, the public generally trust the witness testimony of forces servicemen, more than witness testimony offered by a channel, abductee, or contactee.....
Civillians may carry video camcorders and cameras, but servicemen may carry, starlight scopes, notebooks, dictaphones and radiation counters, as well.
If civillians like George Adamski, Sheldan Nidle, or Billy Meier, offer proof, it will be ignored by many outside of the New Age movement...However, if senior USAF officers offer proof, the ears of the general public, perk up....
Thus my reason for placing such emphasis on the Rendlesham case, which, moreover, is of personal importance to me and a special location and operation, that I'm fully familiar with...
Thankyou for your interest and if you don't know much about the case, I can assure you, that with further investigation, you will find it to be of great value and confirm several questions and answers, as to the ET/ED reality.
Commander Drekx Omega
Replies
DREKX: you may have misread me. I don't distrust all genuine ET contactees, only the ones that seek to make money off of their involvement with such contact. This is important since such people have selfish motives as opposed to universal motives.
OK, a valid point....Maybe Shel should have stayed in Hawaii...And certainly, he doesn't receive much of an income from being a contactee....Albeit, he is supported by friends among the Earth Allies, who value his work...
Anyone can receive a donation from a billionaire supporter....It just takes luck...But does result in a lowering of trust, by others...The material world starseeds are compelled to work in...
So let's lay Sheldan to rest for now and instead focus upon the Rendlesham case, in this forum....
Do you have a particular favourite and compelling eye-witness, among the USAF airmen, you have seen, thus far....? Any points of particular interest about the testimony...??
I like the three-part British documentary about Rendlesham involving the military men at RAF Woodbridge Base (that involved both the British and the U.S. airmen) that witnessed the Rendlesham UFO, because there is no argument about what the men saw or "may have seen" due to the absurd low probability of collusion of sources to create a hoax, as our bank-addicted government a$$holes in the U.S. (and in Great Britain) have asserted with this incident..
Click https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EI9ATxRjiMk for part one
Click https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTLE4TOut2Y for part two
Click https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUjmzcojB_8 for part three
Wasn´t Billy Meier´s case a hoax? I read that the photographs of an extraterrestrial woman he took was really a girl from a TV show.
Sorry I mentioned him, but I did so to allow you to recognise that such people have become useless for further planetary activation, as they are trusted very little by the people, in spite of being genuine ET contactees....No matter I suggest that you now focus upon the Rendlesham case, instead....where higher truths can be confirmed, without frail human personalities getting in the way...
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next