Replies

• 

  Delilah7777 March 21, 2012 at 9:44pm
  • 

    Delilah7777 > Delilah7777 March 21, 2012 at 9:44pm

    In truth, there is no leader, we are all followers and leaders, but in general we should look to be guided by our higher self, or the highest intent.  
    
    If that is truly our "will" and we state that clearly with intent then we will be guided, but we will also be leading ourselves, and able to understand better that the "higher" forces are only there to show us that we are the ones that must take the lead in our own life and beyond.
    
    Because we are a "Equal" in reality, and I think that's what people have a real issue with when it comes to "Galactics" they feel threatened that some entity that is not "god" could have some kind of lead on them, but in reality if we are open and connect with the source, we understand that all things are equal, and from there we can grow into something amazing, because I don't believe for a second that this is the pinnacle that we will reach as a human race....
    
    We've just started to scratch the surface of what we will become. 
• 

  Hannah_Peace March 21, 2012 at 9:38pm

  tertiusgaudens thanks i will look deeper into that. and tell me about it. its driving me crazy what's up with the txt? anyone. ???

  and thank you Kelly, your story made me smile and think what it would had felt like to had been that man at that moment in time.
  • 

    tertiusgaudens > Hannah_Peace March 21, 2012 at 10:40pm

    Hannah,

    here is a fine read at Wikipedia:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophatic_theology

    The thing is, sometimes we can only speak about "something" in terms of what "the something" is not thus getting closer to the distinctiveness of the "something". You don`t know, what it is, so you look, what it is not.
• 

  Hannah_Peace March 21, 2012 at 9:38pm
• 

  tertiusgaudens March 21, 2012 at 7:19pm
  • 

    tertiusgaudens > tertiusgaudens March 21, 2012 at 7:20pm

    Your sentence

    You can never truly prove somthing doesn't exist, all you can do is prove something does 

    
    

    needs some contradiction. This has a long tradition in philosophy what is called via negativa - the way of negation (which contradicts your sentence). The meaning is this:

    Take for instance proving of God`s existence. Smart and honest attempts of any approach will find themself in the field of negative statements. They can only say, what God is not instead of knowing, what God is.

    (The question on "what is" implies, that something "is". But I will leave it this way, it needs lots of further considerations...)

    But generally I like your sentences...

    Greetings!

    Btw, uploading the text is a real problem...