Religions are so many and so diverse that a single word like 'religion' does not mean anything. Freemason is 'religion', Christianity is a 'religion', devil worshiping is 'religion' etc. What do these groups have in common so that we put the same label on them? Nothing! So we should stop talking of 'religion' and rather say the exact group you are attacking.
People who use the word 'religion' are the lazy guys who want to read labels on containers saying 'this is salt', 'this is sugar', 'this is oil' etc, but never want to open the can to check the exact contents. They want an easy, 'one-size-fit-all' diagnosis of human problems. So they have identified one umbrella termed 'religion'. But they are deceiving themselves. Saying 'religion' is like saying 'an animal'. You haven't sayed anything. There is no such a single entity an 'an animal'. It is more meaningfull to say 'cobra', 'tortoise', 'domestic cat', 'leopard', 'giraffe' etc. So when you telk someone, beware, there is a cobra on the way, he understands what you are talking of. Then we generalize afterwards, if we even need such a generalization.
Remember that generalization is a human, lazy shortcut. He can't list all the dangerous groups, so he shoehorn a bulk of them into a single basket and give it a single name. That was the use of generalization. But its abuse is never ending! It is abused to bring about confusion and smear. Rather than examining individual concepts, claims, ideas or people, we just concentrate on seeing their 'earmarks' and then conclud that we have known everything there is to know about them. Guess what? It is 'religion', it is 'politics', it is 'fear'. It is 'ego', he is a 'starseed' etc!
Roaring Lovely > Roaring LovelyFebruary 26, 2021 at 5:15am
I for one never need to figure out a group where an idea, belief etc belong to as a guide to judgement. I don't first categorize, then judge. This is dangerous and misleading. When we think this way, we can easily be manipulated by a few people. Rather that making a judgment, we are shoehorning it to fit what we read in a book, an article, a channelled message etc. Since no channeler writter etc can make a whole list, he sells ideas in bulk. But We can debunk groups, behaviours etc without even saying, for instance, 'this is a religion'. If a group is murderous, it is murderous. Whatever 'group' they belong is irrelevant.
Beware of religious extremists..who force their religions on to others ...they actually do more evil and hide as religious extremists..they pretend to be good outer appearance but inside they are evil ..crooks .. liars..and corrupt
"AE, one of my favourite Nostradamus quatrains provides an incredible insight into what he sees, psychically, in the bowl of water, while alone in his attic room....Number 64 is a vision of the future WW2, with night fighters and bomber crews, being…"
Posted on 03/30/2026 by EraOfLightBeloved Ones,Many of you are being called to stabilize the New Earth’s 5th and 7th-dimensional fabrics and structures that have just been repaired, and are suffering from recent planetary events. The New Earth’s…
"Glad you found that reference to Nostradamus' "man from Asia," interesting...I've been studying Les Prophéties since around the age of seventeen and have always found it interesting to identify the identity of the third antichrist, as Nostradamus…"
Posted on 03/30/2026 by EraOfLightHello our dear ones. We are members of the Galactic Federation and as always we greet you with love. It is an honor to connect with you. It is an honor to bring through messages that we hope will guide and uplift…
Posted on 03/30/2026 by EraOfLightBlessings, Beloved ones.It is an honor to connect with you and all who will be reading and hearing our message. Thank you for this Transmission.You are actively witnessing the collapse of a very ancient order that…
"Thanks Drexk- I'm going to check that Mirror article-but 'Mabus' as mentioned by Nostradamus is kind of funny to me because years ago I was fascinated by Nostradamus and read many of the translated quatrains-then one day I found a two movies from…"
"A famous reference to Nostradamus' predicted "man from Asia," identified as the third antichrist: "Blues Perse, he shall drive out the cross to death..!!"....That's number 80...The French is; "que bleaux, pers, croix, a mort dechassera.
The full…"
Replies
People who use the word 'religion' are the lazy guys who want to read labels on containers saying 'this is salt', 'this is sugar', 'this is oil' etc, but never want to open the can to check the exact contents. They want an easy, 'one-size-fit-all' diagnosis of human problems. So they have identified one umbrella termed 'religion'. But they are deceiving themselves. Saying 'religion' is like saying 'an animal'. You haven't sayed anything. There is no such a single entity an 'an animal'. It is more meaningfull to say 'cobra', 'tortoise', 'domestic cat', 'leopard', 'giraffe' etc. So when you telk someone, beware, there is a cobra on the way, he understands what you are talking of. Then we generalize afterwards, if we even need such a generalization.
Remember that generalization is a human, lazy shortcut. He can't list all the dangerous groups, so he shoehorn a bulk of them into a single basket and give it a single name. That was the use of generalization. But its abuse is never ending! It is abused to bring about confusion and smear. Rather than examining individual concepts, claims, ideas or people, we just concentrate on seeing their 'earmarks' and then conclud that we have known everything there is to know about them. Guess what? It is 'religion', it is 'politics', it is 'fear'. It is 'ego', he is a 'starseed' etc!