Replies

  • Religions are so many and so diverse that a single word like 'religion' does not mean anything. Freemason is 'religion', Christianity is a 'religion', devil worshiping is 'religion' etc. What do these groups have in common so that we put the same label on them? Nothing! So we should stop talking of 'religion' and rather say the exact group you are attacking.

    People who use the word 'religion' are the lazy guys who want to read labels on containers saying 'this is salt', 'this is sugar', 'this is oil' etc, but never want to open the can to check the exact contents. They want an easy, 'one-size-fit-all' diagnosis of human problems. So they have identified one umbrella termed 'religion'. But they are deceiving themselves. Saying 'religion' is like saying 'an animal'. You haven't sayed anything. There is no such a single entity an 'an animal'. It is more meaningfull to say 'cobra', 'tortoise', 'domestic cat', 'leopard', 'giraffe' etc. So when you telk someone, beware, there is a cobra on the way, he understands what you are talking of. Then we generalize afterwards, if we even need such a generalization.

    Remember that generalization is a human, lazy shortcut. He can't list all the dangerous groups, so he shoehorn a bulk of them into a single basket and give it a single name. That was the use of generalization. But its abuse is never ending! It is abused to bring about confusion and smear. Rather than examining individual concepts, claims, ideas or people, we just concentrate on seeing their 'earmarks' and then conclud that we have known everything there is to know about them. Guess what? It is 'religion', it is 'politics', it is 'fear'. It is 'ego', he is a 'starseed' etc!
    • I for one never need to figure out a group where an idea, belief etc belong to as a guide to judgement. I don't first categorize, then judge. This is dangerous and misleading. When we think this way, we can easily be manipulated by a few people. Rather that making a judgment, we are shoehorning it to fit what we read in a book, an article, a channelled message etc. Since no channeler writter etc can make a whole list, he sells ideas in bulk. But We can debunk groups, behaviours etc without even saying, for instance, 'this is a religion'. If a group is murderous, it is murderous. Whatever 'group' they belong is irrelevant.
  • Do not trust religious extremists..they are dangerous reptilians
  • Beware of religious extremists..who force their religions on to others ...they actually do more evil and hide as religious extremists..they pretend to be good outer appearance but inside they are evil ..crooks .. liars..and corrupt
This reply was deleted.

Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"Well the inner Earth is Agartha, so if it wasn’t Agartha then it sounds like possible fakes.. Have you got the pics?"
1 hour ago
Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"Yeah, looking at some of them I wouldn’t be surprised."
1 hour ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"I saw another set of photos from the late 19th century that claimed ti be inside the Earth-not Argartha but a dark place with strange looking humans-the flora and fauna were strange, too. There were dozens of pics that looked genuine, but they were…"
1 hour ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"I believe that there were giants but some of those pics must be photoshopped"
1 hour ago
Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"Having pituitary gigantism couldn’t have been easy, especially considering it causes so many ailments. It makes you appreciate the importance of proportion.. I think I’ll stick to being 5’5!"
2 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"The human race on Earth was once tall and massive, in proportionate scale, so as to exist among animals, of similarly large proportion and stature..the so-called mega fauna of the Pleistocene epoch...Nature, or shall we correct that word and suggest…"
2 hours ago
Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"AE, It’s definitely an unusual look and they seem much taller than any human giants you see nowadays. I think they’re humans with pituitary gigantism? They probably spent years scouting the globe for the most extreme cases and rounded them all up to…"
2 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Yes, in very ancient humans on Earth, being 8-foot tall, plus, was normal and of course, these individuals are rare, now, but worldwide genetic throwbacks, which, as suggested in the video, were once permitted in freak shows, as with all anomalies…"
3 hours ago
More…

DIDACTIC OF SELF-KNOWLEDGE-CHAPTER THREE


                                                                                     III

                                                               THE CURRENT OF SOUND

To understand is something immediate, direct, something we…

Read more…
Views: 7
Comments: 0