BREAKING NEWS : ‘Anti-nuclear’ Obama plans to spend $1 trillion on nukes...YES ONLY $1 TRILLION...I Am Not Naive Says O bum ma

“I’m not naïve,” Obama said that year. “This goal will not be reached quickly — perhaps not in my lifetime. It will take patience and persistence.”After speaking with analysts, however, the Times journalists — both Pulitzer winners in their own right — now raise doubts that the commander-in-chief’s campaign goals will come to fruition anytime soon.“With Russia on the warpath, China pressing its own territorial claims and Pakistan expanding its arsenal, the overall chances for Mr. Obama’s legacy of disarmament look increasingly dim, analysts say,” they wrote. “Congress has expressed less interest in atomic reductions than looking tough in Washington’s escalating confrontation with Moscow.”Indeed, international disputes have without a doubt raised concerns in recent years over the nuclear programs of other nations. The Washington Post reported this week that Pakistan is working towards achieving the capability to launch sea-based, short-range nuclear arms, and concurrently the Kremlin confirmed that Russia is set to renew the country’s strategic nuclear forces by 100 percent, not 70 percent as previously announced.As those countries ramp up their nuclear programs on their own, the Times report cites a recent study from the Washington, DC-based Government Accountability Office to show that the US is making more than just a minor investment with regards to America’s nukes. According to that report, 21 major upgrades to nuclear facilities have already been approved, yet in the five years since Obama took office, “the modernization push” to upgrade the nukes has been “poorly managed and financially unaccountable.”“It estimated the total cost of the nuclear enterprise over the next three decades at roughly $900 billion to $1.1 trillion,” the journalists noted. “Policy makers, the [GAO] report said, ‘are only now beginning to appreciate the full scope of these procurement costs.’”“I’m not naïve,” Obama said that year. “This goal will not be reached quickly — perhaps not in my lifetime. It will take patience and persistence.”After speaking with analysts, however, the Times journalists — both Pulitzer winners in their own right — now raise doubts that the commander-in-chief’s campaign goals will come to fruition anytime soon.“With Russia on the warpath, China pressing its own territorial claims and Pakistan expanding its arsenal, the overall chances for Mr. Obama’s legacy of disarmament look increasingly dim, analysts say,” they wrote. “Congress has expressed less interest in atomic reductions than looking tough in Washington’s escalating confrontation with Moscow.”Indeed, international disputes have without a doubt raised concerns in recent years over the nuclear programs of other nations. The Washington Post reported this week that Pakistan is working towards achieving the capability to launch sea-based, short-range nuclear arms, and concurrently the Kremlin confirmed that Russia is set to renew the country’s strategic nuclear forces by 100 percent, not 70 percent as previously announced.As those countries ramp up their nuclear programs on their own, the Times report cites a recent study from the Washington, DC-based Government Accountability Office to show that the US is making more than just a minor investment with regards to America’s nukes. According to that report, 21 major upgrades to nuclear facilities have already been approved, yet in the five years since Obama took office, “the modernization push” to upgrade the nukes has been “poorly managed and financially unaccountable.”“It estimated the total cost of the nuclear enterprise over the next three decades at roughly $900 billion to $1.1 trillion,” the journalists noted. “Policy makers, the [GAO] report said, ‘are only now beginning to appreciate the full scope of these procurement costs.’”

"In fact, in 1949, it was James Forrestal (Former United States Secretary of Defense,) who was a member of MJ12, but wanted to break ranks and reveal the UFO coverup to the people....Forrestal was a natural telepath and received comms from multiple…"

"Of course, Uri knows there are many, many species of GFL light beings...as star nation members...Not just "a species," singular...45% humanoid and 55% non-humanoid...The devas work alongside the GFL, so he means a species serving Light, serving the…"

Replies

Krishna Kalki September 23, 2014 at 11:08pm

Instead of fighting for peace in the world here is a so called leader fighting for war ...and the end result would be the survival of the planet we call home ...no you know why some say the next war after the Third World War will be with sticks and stones

This reply was deleted.

Spiritual Forum

BREAKING NEWS : ‘Anti-nuclear’ Obama plans to spend $1 trillion on nukes...YES ONLY $1 TRILLION...I Am Not Naive Says O bum ma

Replies

Latest Discussion

Anything Health Related

Replay of New Year Reiki Share January 2026 By Reiki Master Nicholas Pearson

Tuesday, Jan 13 - Online Community Reiki Circle With Tracy Cash - Tuesday at 7 PM CST

Note: this page contains paid content.

Most Popular Discussion

The hidden meaning behind the color of the eyes

Blood Type and Starseed Origins

Comprehensive List Of Companies That Use Aborted Fetal Cells As Flavor

Note: this page contains paid content.

Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

Latest Activity

New Blog Posts

turning a global vaccination campaign into an uncontrolled experiment with human DNA.

Pleiadian Collective & the 5th-Dimensional Arcturian Council: Anchoring the Frequencies of the Central Sun in the Planetary Grid; Channel: Octavia Vasile | Source.

Andromeda Intergalactic Council: No More; Channel: Chellea Wilder | Source.

12 Steps to 4D Awakening & Ascension for the 2nd Waver's & Lightworkers ; The Holy Trinity - Holy Spirit & Mystery Monitor; by rev.joshua skirvin.

Note: this page contains paid content.