You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Latest Activity
"Light, as in sunlight, illumination or fire, was described by Sumerians as "izingar" 𒉈𒃻....in it's normal presentation, as to shine or be bright, was described by Sumerians as "zalag,"𒂟....A reflected light, off a shiny surface, such as polished…"
"Glad that you enjoyed the Atlantis vid, AE.....and I hope you also enjoy this modern jazz funk piece, which I found recently and absolutely adore....Knowing your good tastes in music, you will too, no doubts....𒉆 ্নার
Jazzin'🎵🎶🎵🎶🎵🎶🎵✨✨🌎✨✨𒈨👏🏻😎…"
Jazzin'🎵🎶🎵🎶🎵🎶🎵✨✨🌎✨✨𒈨👏🏻😎…"
"All westerners should hear this!
https://www.facebook.com/reel/890329747128569"
https://www.facebook.com/reel/890329747128569"
"Awesome Atlantis vid, Drexk-Plato had access to ancient texts, apparently. The ancient circular city of Bagdad -'The original Round City was eventually absorbed into the expanding metropolis and largely disappeared.'"
"Light, as in sunlight, illumination or fire, was described by Sumerians as "izingar" 𒉈𒃻....in it's normal presentation, as to shine or be bright, was described by Sumerians as "zalag,"𒌓....A reflected light, off a shiny surface, such as polished…"
"Light, as in sunlight, illumination or fire, was described by Sumerians as "izingar" 𒉈𒃻....in it's normal presentation, as to shine or be bright, was described by Sumerians as "zalag,"𒌓....A reflected light, off a shiny surface, such as polished…"
Replies
But which came first? The message, or the events that back it up?
Couldn't channelers just model their message on anything going on in the world and have it sound true?
I want to believe. I will pendulum this a bit and see what I get...
*Mr. Pendulum, is this message a clear and accurate description of true events?*
...
The pendulum says no...
Also "This message" is not the greatest way to target the subject matter, unless you can clearly and steadily hold the content in your conscious mind at the point of asking. Lets remember, its a channelled message.....so it goes through the channeller's consciousness and always picks up a slant, or stuff that is not quite accurate. One small discrepancy could have resulted in the 'no' swing. Maybe a series of questions on different parts of the message? and some averages?
Unless you're someone like Bashar who can link with his future self very tightly and let that future consciousness occupy his current body and deliver information and interact with us, there is always room for error of some sort.
Applied Kinesiology (muscle twitch technique) would be a better litmus test :)