Comment Wall
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Comments are closed.
THE MESSAGE OF AQUARIUS
Samael Aun Weor
…
Your Relationship With Fear By Natalie Glasson With Archangel Raphael
Your Relationship With Fear By Natalie Glasson With Archangel Raphael Greetings, greetings, greetings I share with you. I am Archangel Raphael. I come forth with the angelic vibration and bring forth the archangels to surround you with their…
Read more…Contemplations Of Love
Contemplations Of Love Love is the internal dance that illuminates this human consciousness, in internal knowledge, in internal understanding, in the supreme magic of each one of our senses. Blessed be the divine breath of God, cosmic universe…
Read more…Embracing Divine Freedom & Enlightenment By Emmanuel Dagher
Embracing Divine Freedom & Enlightenment By Emmanuel Dagher The old, deeply rooted survival patterns that we have been identifying with for so long have been coming to the surface in recent weeks. Have you noticed? This is happening because we…
Read more…❤Choose Love. Stand In Love. Be Love! By Melanie Beckler❤
❤Choose Love. Stand In Love. Be Love! By Melanie Beckler❤ Blessings and welcome to a new week! This is a powerful week for shifting energy… We’re still well within the energy of the powerful Solstice Gateway... when the light of the Sun activated…
Read more…You Are The Heart Of God
You are guided through our intimate communion and expanded in our unity of endless life. Most of all, you are the heart of God, awake, alive and present, standing on the crossroads for humanity and being the beacon of freedom. As the Moment of…
Read more…Latest Activity
https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-06-30-bill-gates-invading-poor-cou..."
Comments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRwCPUEND1U
Talk of 'forensic science', but I asked: can a judge be entrusted to do 'forensic studies' and then deliver judgement in a case where he himself is the prime suspect that the 'forensic study' will reveal?? Can you be a judge in your own case?? That's my object ion. I am not questioning the forensic study. I am questioning the judge!!
Of course you won't cope with my arguments. I will simply tire you with having to read a thaosand page long argument. You will tire me because at every post of yours, I will have to debunk virtually every sentence you write!! You are many miles away from understanding my argument.
A computer is a 'gabbage in cabbage out' device.
But you miss the point! If a 'black supremacist' take skulls around and do 'forensic studies' and reconstruct images for 'races', voila! He will conclude that 'everyone was black'! Same is the case for a 'white supremacist'. I am not saying that there are no good criterias for reconstructing faces from skulls. I am saying that when it comes to 'race' issue, humans are nolonger rational nor objective. This is because almost everyone have interest in the matter and as a matter of facts, humans are never good judges in matters in which they have interest. This is why no one is ever appointed as a judge in his own case!
Moreover, computers are also pretty accurate, once a 3D image of a skull is measured, "flesh" can be placed upon the bone...
Faces come to life that were long dead....Surprised someone as educated as Roaring, fails to know this...
Let's see the face of King Richard III, beyond the paintings...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBXaZkCnP44
Positron; It is the antiparticle (antimatter counterpart) of the electron. When a positron collides with an electron, annihilation occurs. If this collision occurs at low energies, it results in the production of two or more photons.
Like I told you, we can only congently discuss this question if we find common premises because there are no evidences we can agree on since they are works of other 'reserchers' which I can't trust them. Stop telling me 'facts' because I didn't participate in the search of those 'facts'. Please try to give me your premises, not 'facts'.
Tell me, 'do you agree that bla bla bla', then I will say 'yes' or 'no'. I too will ask you if you agree that 'ble ble ble', and you will say 'yes' or 'no'. Then we will note the premises we agreed on. From those premises alone, I will deduce an answer for you using pure reasoning! No need to quote researches done by other people who had their own interests in the matter!