Ashtar Command Crew - The Awakening Movement

Comments

• 

  Roaring Lovely May 20, 2025 at 1:12pm

  Oh! So you don't want to proceed? I think you make a good choice cause if we go on through all premises, I will unwind the logic for you in over 1000 pages or so. I don't think you can cope with all those arguments, nor can I cope with having to correct you in every post etc. We will get tired for nothing, and waste a lot of our time. We can go through all the Bible with a 'jehovah's witness'. I don't think I can convince him!
• 

  Drekx Omega May 20, 2025 at 1:12pm

  Hi AE....Yes, the positron beam shoots a charge of positively charged electrons across the ship's hull, which enables field propagation...and is directional...
• 

  Drekx Omega May 20, 2025 at 1:08pm

  

  Actually the forensic science of facial reconstructions has been used, to accurately provide investigators with accurate data on a corpse without a name...such as someone found dead with no paperwork...no credit card, drivers license, etc
  
  Moreover, computers are also pretty accurate, once a 3D image of a skull is measured, "flesh" can be placed upon the bone...
  Faces come to life that were long dead....Surprised someone as educated as Roaring, fails to know this...
  
  Let's see the face of King Richard III, beyond the paintings...
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBXaZkCnP44
• 

  AlternateEarth May 20, 2025 at 1:07pm

  Drexk-what does the positron beam actually do? Thanks
  Positron; It is the antiparticle (antimatter counterpart) of the electron. When a positron collides with an electron, annihilation occurs. If this collision occurs at low energies, it results in the production of two or more photons.
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 20, 2025 at 12:59pm

  

  Dreks,
  Like I told you, we can only congently discuss this question if we find common premises because there are no evidences we can agree on since they are works of other 'reserchers' which I can't trust them. Stop telling me 'facts' because I didn't participate in the search of those 'facts'. Please try to give me your premises, not 'facts'.
  
  Tell me, 'do you agree that bla bla bla', then I will say 'yes' or 'no'. I too will ask you if you agree that 'ble ble ble', and you will say 'yes' or 'no'. Then we will note the premises we agreed on. From those premises alone, I will deduce an answer for you using pure reasoning! No need to quote researches done by other people who had their own interests in the matter!
• 

  AlternateEarth May 20, 2025 at 12:56pm

  Lunatic Liberals and Deranged Democrats are fighting to keep chemicals in food, water and medicine while screaming for more war, embezzlements and open borders
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-05-19-rfk-jr-derangement-syndrome-...

  

  The world's top new source on natural health - NaturalNews.com

  The world's top new source on natural health - NaturalNews.com
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 20, 2025 at 12:53pm

  A skull can tell what 'race' someone is? You must be kidding here! People will argue for hours about what 'race' tukankhamen was and yet we have a full bust. You cannot tell what 'race' someone his, even if you curve out their whole face, and you tell me you can tell it from a mere skull? You can't! These are subjective matters, not 'science'.
  
  You didn't answer the question as 'yes' or 'no' the way I intended. You gave your own theory as to how a black person can have been in ancient Egypt. No we are not yet there. I ask:
  
  Can't a black person have been in ancient Egypt?
  
  We are not yet to the question of who the Egyptians were, nor to the question of how 'black people' got there. In fact, I have not even made a conclusion that there were black people in Egypt. I have just ask: is it possible that in ancient times, there were black people in Egypt? Please say 'yes' or 'no'.
• 

  Drekx Omega May 20, 2025 at 12:34pm

  

  Ah, but the context is also relevant....Indeed, there were black people living in ancient Egypt, as you could see easily, on that bas relief, imported as slaves by Pharaohs such as Horemheb, Ramasses and others, who took territory off their southern neighbours, of the sub-Saharan race....It was their policy of the day and one used by many others, too...Babylonians, Greeks, Romans...
  So I never said a black skinned person was never in Egypt.....But, I am suggesting that the Egyptians themselves were not black and we have provided you with an excess of evidence, both subjective and objective forensics...
  DNA reveals a hell of a lot about racial and personal characteristics.....Even a skull can be reconstructed into a "living" face...
  And there are many Pharonic bodies and the bodies of multiple Egyptian officials, as well.....that prove they were not black sub-saharans, themselves...Nor were ancient Britons....These are facts...
  
  Moreover, pure logic tells us this story...For example, we have evidence that Vikings from Norway had amazingly accomplished sea-faring abilities, producing ships that could travel across seas and oceans, such as the Atlantic...
  
  In contrast, we have no such evidence that sub-Saharan Africans ever built comparable ships....
  
  If someone suggested that an ancient tribe was able to travel to North America, centuries before Columbus, would it be an African tribe, or a tribe from Norway...??? Logic alone indicates our choices.....Evidence backs them..
  And forensics is continually improving.....We can now look directly into history and discover truths previously unknown..
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 20, 2025 at 12:22pm

  

  If nothing prevents someone from having been at a place, then he could have been there, and he probably was there! So my argument will start with a premis:
  
  1.there is nothing about having a 'black' skin that prevents someone from having been in ancient Egypt.
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 20, 2025 at 12:18pm

  

  Drekx,
  
  I am more of logist or a philosopher. I simply ask: what prevents a blue eyed blonde from being in Levant some 6500 years ago??? This is not a question of 'science' or 'evidence'. It is a LOGICAL question. What is it about having blue eyes that prevents you from being in Levant some 6500 years ago??? What is it about being 'black' that prevents someone from being there? We can begin by offering some PHILOSOPHICAL arguments that determines if ppl were locked up in certain places based on their skin colours. If there is no rational reason, why suppose that pple in ancient times were partitioned and locked up in various places based on their skin or eye colours?