Ashtar Command Crew - The Awakening Movement

Comments

• 

  Drekx Omega April 7, 2026 at 8:48am

  

  Those conspiracy theories about "fake moon landings,"promulgated for decades by intellectual pygmies, even by some ex-members on AC, are in for a rude awakening....All the hardware and astronaut footprints, rover tracks, are still in tact...and can be viewed from space and using strong telescopes, from Earth....Proving that it was not fake, but really happened...Moreover, Stanley Kubrick (American filmmaker) never believed that Apollo landings were fake and I remember having long debates on AC, a few years back with member, "Luke Skywalker," about this false claim that Kubrick thought this, when he did not..
  
  OK I know this truth of actual landings, but will ask AI (Orac) anyway....Were the lunar landings faked..??:-
  
  "No, the Moon landings were not fake. Multiple, independent sources of evidence—including lunar rocks, laser-reflective mirrors placed on the surface, and photographs of landing sites from robotic probes—confirm that the Apollo missions landed on the Moon six times between 1969 and 1972."
  
  "Evidence Confirming the Moon Landing:
  Lunar Samples: NASA brought back 382 kilograms of moon rocks and soil, which have been analyzed by scientists worldwide. These rocks are confirmed to be non-terrestrial, showing no evidence of exposure to water or oxygen, and bearing marks of extreme radiation."
  "Laser Retroreflectors: Astronauts placed specialized mirrors on the moon, which scientists continue to use today to measure the exact distance between Earth and the Moon.
  Satellite Imagery: Modern lunar satellites, such as NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), have taken photographs showing the lunar rover, abandoned."
• 

  Drekx Omega April 7, 2026 at 8:26am

  Trump has a real passion for space missions.....Reminds me of Nixon talking to astronauts, during Apollo..
• 

  Movella April 7, 2026 at 8:06am

  

  ‘As the astronauts swept over the far side in the Orion spacecraft, they reported seeing striking geometric patterns, winding formations they deemed 'squiggles' and unexpected shades of green and brown across the rugged lunar terrain’ 🌑✨
  
  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15710263/artemis-ii...
• 

  Movella April 7, 2026 at 7:55am

  https://youtu.be/38vogAB_thU?si=_u5xvYiLC7lsLFGM
• 

  Movella April 6, 2026 at 10:32pm

  Well the inner Earth is Agartha, so if it wasn’t Agartha then it sounds like possible fakes.. Have you got the pics?
• 

  Movella April 6, 2026 at 10:01pm

  Yeah, looking at some of them I wouldn’t be surprised.
• 

  AlternateEarth April 6, 2026 at 10:01pm

  I saw another set of photos from the late 19th century that claimed ti be inside the Earth-not Argartha but a dark place with strange looking humans-the flora and fauna were strange, too. There were dozens of pics that looked genuine, but they were probably faked-the sets looked real
• 

  AlternateEarth April 6, 2026 at 9:57pm

  I believe that there were giants but some of those pics must be photoshopped
• 

  Movella April 6, 2026 at 9:23pm

  Having pituitary gigantism couldn’t have been easy, especially considering it causes so many ailments. It makes you appreciate the importance of proportion.. I think I’ll stick to being 5’5!
• 

  Drekx Omega April 6, 2026 at 8:51pm

  

  The human race on Earth was once tall and massive, in proportionate scale, so as to exist among animals, of similarly large proportion and stature..the so-called mega fauna of the Pleistocene epoch...Nature, or shall we correct that word and suggest intelligence of spirit operating, scales up a given evolutionary form, to match other forms..in existence....We see this throughout history, too....and the diet can also play a part...The little guy in the artwork of mega fauna seems disadvantaged...he would have been bigger to hunt the game..
  
  https://dinoanimals.com/animals/megafauna/

  

  Megafauna – big animals | DinoAnimals.com

  Characteristic of the Oligocene and Pleistocene megafauna, and the modern-day one, that is slightly "shrunken".