https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/shutterstock_1849400320-e1702642079804.jpg 810w" alt="Featured Image" /> …
https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/shutterstock_1849400320-e1702642079804.jpg 810w" alt="Featured Image" /> …
Comments
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-07-19-musk-moves-x-spacex-texas-ca...
https://eaglesjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Donald-Trump-A...
"Logic tells me there was probably only one shooter, or the casualties would be greater."
Drekx response:
And I would suggest that the audio evidence does suggest, not only one shooter, but three, including the USSS counter sniper duo, who took out Crooks with a single shot, as well as the proven distant shots from the water tower, which were NOT INCOMING, but shots six and seven, fired at the professional sniper, which prevented him firing at Trump....
So logic does indeed suggest that casualties would have been higher, including Trump, if that shooter had fired, even one round.....So this indicates that the shots, six and seven, were not fired by him, but into him (a double-tap) and his body forensics removed from the scene, by white hats...Witnesses may come forward, regarding this...People near the tower at that time...
All this focus on the patsy, Thomas Crooks, reminds me of all the JFK assassination "investigation" focus, placed upon Oswald......The expression, look over here, not over there, springs to mind...Exactly.....
Moreover, observe the amateurish (yet deliberate) way, the USSS placed the very small agent, a female ducking her head, JUST IN FRONT OF TRUMP, to "shield" him from fire....Fire they were expecting from someone other than Crooks...as he had been shot..
https://wrestlingjunkie-eu.usatoday.com/gcdn/authoring/authoring-im...
-
733
-
734
-
735
-
736
-
737
of 1910 Next