A basic conclusion is at the end for the uninitiated. This New Moon event may invite arguments and debates with Mercury Conjunction Mars, and thus social gatherings and meetings may have conflict present. A rareā¦
Comment Wall
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Comments are closed.
Want to know the truth about all the chaos & spiritual transformations happening around our planet? Ashtar Command update..."Live" or on Replay this Saturday!Ā ā¦
Ā
Ā
Ā
I thought 'they' were experimenting-keeping notes on the effects
Ā
Touching Superconsciousness | Kryon & Alcazar Channeling: The Gateway to Everything That IS
Ā Touching Superconsciousness | Kryon & Alcazar Channeling: The Gateway to Everything That ISĀ On the first day of 2026, Kryon and Alcazar reveal the profound dimensional shift that is now available to humanity - the ability to touchā¦
Read moreā¦Touching Superconsciousness | Kryon & Alcazar Channeling: The Gateway to Everything That IS
Ā Touching Superconsciousness | Kryon & Alcazar Channeling: The Gateway to Everything That ISĀ On the first day of 2026, Kryon and Alcazar reveal the profound dimensional shift that is now available to humanity - the ability to touchā¦
Read moreā¦It Is A Great Blessing To Be On Earth Now !
The Great Council of the GrandmothersVideo Link - Keys To The New Year -Ā https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9TLY_-vMfkIt Is A Great Blessing To Be On Earth Now !The Great Council of The Grandmothers Channeled By Sharon McErlaneĀ Ā Ā āSink in,ā the Grandā¦
Read moreā¦Cosmic Connections By The Andromedans Through Natalie Glasson
Ā Cosmic Connections By The Andromedans Through Natalie GlassonĀ Greetings, greetings to you all wonderful beacons and beings of light, we are the Andromedans, and we come forth to share with you our divine consciousness, love, energy, and the wisdom.ā¦
Read moreā¦How To Ignite Your Soul By Master Melchizedek Through Natalie Glasson
Ā How To Ignite Your Soul By Master Melchizedek Through Natalie GlassonĀ Greetings, greetings beloved ones, it is I, Lord Melchizedek, once more. I am the collective Melchizedek consciousness flowing to you from the universal level. Ā It is an honourā¦
Read moreā¦Step Into 2026 With Divine Intention & Presence By Sylvie Horvath
Ā Step Into 2026 With Divine Intention & Presence By Sylvie HorvathĀ As we step out of 2025 and into a new year, many of us do so from a year shaped by change, uncertainty, and challenge ā both personally and collectively.Ā And yet, moments like thisā¦
Read moreā¦Latest Activity
Special forces around the world, could easily place the best among Britain'sā¦"
Is Trump goingā¦"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg5AAIhakoU"
Comments
Obviously international relations are yet to be based on consistent principles!!
So the rule against unilateral sucesion was never based on ethics at all, but the desire to not have 'too small' and hence 'too many' countries. Too many countries will be difficult to manipulate! All merely expedient rules donnot raise eyebrows when they are brocken. However, there is obvious ethical reason why unilateral sucesion should be illegal. A single country often share taxes in a way that should they break apart, one cannot tell what owe what and how much and where exactly should the boundaries be drawn. So unilateral secession should be illegal.
Now come to Ukraine. The sucession of Ukraine off USSR was never unilateral, but it involved Russia. So there must have been expectations Russia had about an 'independent Ukraine' when it agreed that Ukraine should be independent. Otherwise Russia would not have agreed so, and then sucession of Ukraine would have been illegal. But now ethically speaking, what if Ukraine now retract from its ways and behaviours? Does Russia have a right to review its earlier decision to allow Ukrain to secede? I think the answer is a big YES, for otherwise the rule against unilateral sucession would not have any moral/ ethical basis. The point is that had Ukraine behaved the same way it behaves today,(ie adoption an unti-Russian attitude that leaves some regions pro-Russia hence dividing the country), albeit back in early 1990s, Russia would not have allowed Ukraine to succeed, or at least it would have disputed the boundaries (so that the pro-Russian regions remain in Russia). Thus one can, in a logically sound way, Turn the argument that Donesk etc has no right to unilateraly sucede from Ukraine, on Ukraine and NATO's own head!
To put it in summary, the fact Ukraine was recently part of Russia means that the two still has some rights to claim/dispute their territories, as part of the very rule against sucession now NATO etc try to apply it in Donesk etc!
More silly politics š„³
https://i.ibb.co/Pcym10Z/B2-D5-A544-7-D5-C-409-E-962-C-652-D17-DDCE...
Reply:
One big problem with us human beings is that we begine by first choosing the side we like. After that, we begine thinking. We do so such that we are critical to whatever fact, evidence or argument that favours the side we have choosen against. We do so in all fields, from religion to science to maths to politics etc. Every human being is prone to this problem, from experts to Lehmen. If you think that you are not prone to it, then you are deceiving yourself!
But what does it drive us to choose sides first? Unfortunately, in most cases, it is never facts, nor logic nor sense. It is often emotionally charging scenarios. You might like Elon musk as a person, Zelensky, Putin or whatever. You might have developed prejudice against Russia, US or NATO. So you have already 'choosen your side'. It is just like in a football match or such things. You choose Arsenal before they win the tournament, or even a match. Henceforth you will be talking about how 'good' arsenal is, despite losing the match. You ignore or belittle all 'facts' that are contrary to the side you have chosen.
Skilled politicians are aware of this human limitation very well. So they often try to make sure that they lead their followers to first choose a side before they can reason about that side or the other side. Thus an issue of contest must never first be what exactly Elon Musk etc said. You must first choose what type of 'Elon Musk' you prefer. You must first choose between Russia and Ukraine before you think and judge the situation. The end result is almost always, a misjudgement!
It's actually rather enjoyable to know, that some of we starseeds, know much, much more, about so called "UAP/USO/UFOs," than they do......I think some of these clowns are more concerned about the "science" definition being "correct," than anything useful, like the cultures and civilisations that manufacture and send them....(Most are based at the GFL Command base, within the Earth.)
The less corrupt DNC & Rhino politicians know, the better......BUT, if they are well meaning patriots and champions of the people, then we're happy that they receive the briefing and without further secrecy...Open the subject up, more....We need the cabal out of the way first, though....as well as their crazy MSM...
ššøšøšøšøšø
https://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/videos/drekx-omega-location-of-ea...
The US congress will interview insiders and they will get immunity if they signed a NDA on that matter, but we the people will not be updated on the data.
And now worldwide UFO researchers don't want the USA to dominate the narrative on UFOs!
Saw this the other day
by James Joyce;
My love is in a light attire
Among the apple-trees,
Where the gay winds do most desire
To run in companies.
There, where the gay winds stay to woo
The young leaves as they pass,
My love goes slowly, bending to
Her shadow on the grass;
And where the sky's a pale blue cup
Over the laughing land,
My love goes lightly, holding up
Her dress with dainty hand.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NB6y6ZbZZw
-
1117
-
1118
-
1119
-
1120
-
1121
of 1759 Next