THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF NATURE
People believe that nature is unconscious, but they are mistaken. Poor people!
“CHILDREN OF THE EARTH! Listen to your instructors, the Children of…
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Comments are closed.
THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF NATURE
People believe that nature is unconscious, but they are mistaken. Poor people!
“CHILDREN OF THE EARTH! Listen to your instructors, the Children of…
It's doubtful that the island will become Epstien Island 2.0.
'Some people are calling the planned resort “Epstein Island 2.0,” and it turns out that…
Holding the Light Through Uncertainty By Tori Cota-Robles In times of uncertainty, it can feel easy to become…
Read more…SMILE YOUR BEAUTIFUL SMILE Smile at anyone and everyone as a giftfrom your heart. Just smile from your quietness. And be curious about what happens.Listen, feel, and experience this Guided Meditation ~ Inner Journey - click the image below: …
Read more…Wednesday - Living Oneness Gathering - Every Wednesday at 12 PM CDT Click Here To Join By Zoom - https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85103530428?pwd=bzZwVlVkVEc1ZjZQd1hhSi9kQ3lLZz09 Join our free LIVE healing experience & Community-Unity gathering every…
Read more…Earth Body: A Reiki Workshop + CollectiveLet’s get together We’re hosting a new event, and we’d love to see you there. Join us for Earth Body: A Reiki Workshop + Collective, Monday June 8, 2026 at 6:00 PM.Register soon because space is limited.We…
Read more…Universal Heart, Universal Mind" Meditation – Dr Joe Dispenza and Mei-lan Introducing “Universal Heart, Universal Mind” – a short, 15-minute guided meditation designed to help you create heart and brain coherence while holding a vision of love and…
Read more…Where Would I Consciously Be Without Having Had This Life On Earth? Individual belief systems are rapidly changing as global and personal situations inspire increasingly more people to question the views and activities of those in positions of…
Read more…
Comments
Of course if an ancient man, who coined 'chi', hears a claim that chi is a 'quantum coherent biofield', he won't say 'wow! That is physical'! The 'physicality' misnomer was not yet existent in those days. Neither was 'science' seemed to oppose such views in those days. So there was no need for the answer 'science cannot explain this' as a way to wade off a sceptic trying to use 'science' to undermine chi. So the one who conceived 'chi' could not have meant 'what no scientist will ever discover no matter what, no matter what time in future'. This definition will not be wise! 'Science' and 'scientific method', stance and paradigm changes from time to time. We should avoid such definitions as 'not explicable by science' etc
BTW coherent biophotons are natural lasers!
It is a tragic error to think that by saying 'physical', physicist has observed a thing about the entity and, in an objective manner, note that it has a certain property. The concept 'physical' is not like 'density'. We cannot observe anything common between a stone and a 'field' so it warrants the same label, 'physical', apart from the two being capable of affecting the visible things. In other words, we know not much about 'field', and calling it 'physical' does not help us understand anything more about it, than, for instance, we had called it 'siritual'.
-
1852
-
1853
-
1854
-
1855
-
1856
of 1919 Next