Replies

• 

  SuzieG September 10, 2014 at 3:13pm

  https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/Bills/54PDF/2013/VicLawAssDisB13...

  Check this shit out, you can be a soccer club, country womens association and even a meditation group... But lets look at the big picture as this is about people peacefully protesting...if they need to use it...

   
  • 

    SuzieG > SuzieG September 10, 2014 at 3:15pm

    This law covers basically anyone and everyone, as long as it isn't 3 or more.. but the bikkies were the excuse this was brought in.. funny as because all of a sudden all shit broke loose in an area that is WELL recognised for being a "tourism place" and now this.
• 

  SuzieG September 10, 2014 at 2:59pm

  Now that is funny! Cause our PM of Australia may have a dual citizenship!!!

  http://www.newpolitics.com.au/what-is-tony-abbott-hiding

  Suzexxx

   
  • 

    SuzieG > SuzieG September 10, 2014 at 3:00pm

    But, yes theres a but... right to information wont give it...
• 

  1 darkstar September 10, 2014 at 7:44am

  Interesting info.  There may be some progress.
  • 

    Malcolm > 1 darkstar September 10, 2014 at 9:56am

    Regarding Obama's use of Harry Bounel's Social Security number, expect the U.S. Department of Justice (run by Eric "Fast And Furious" Holder) to investigate and come up with nothing. This may be why Holder still hasn't been fired, despite the blatant corruption regarding Operation Fast and Furious.(which resulted in a U.S. Border Patrolman getting killed by an illegal weapon sold to a drug dealer by a U.S. agent working within the Fast And Furious Operation (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Justice)).

    The best we can do is protest peacefully, and not quit and continue to try to wake up others to the criminals running our government and who are looting our people (and responding to us with claims of racism when we complain about their criminal activity).
• This reply was deleted.
  • 

    Malcolm September 10, 2014 at 6:45am

    I have no weird fetish with Obama except that he is a Nobel Peace Prize winner who states "I'm really good at killing people," and I take offense to that as a health care provider.

    Click https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLdFAg5Y7R0 for proof of this Nobel Laureate stating this.

    Click https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSoYvtf-wqw for another source of Obama making this statement.

    Yeah, he's a real nice guy. So was Uncle Joe Stalin and Al Capone.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLdFAg5Y7R0

    Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
• 

  Malcolm September 10, 2014 at 5:09am

  The stamp above is either sick humor from Kenya's government or they know something about Obama's place of birth that we don't know.

  The source of this story is http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/05/12/judge-orders-investigation-ob...

  The Federal judge (a.k.a. wingnut) is Ellen Lipton Hollander, and the defense from Obama's attorney (Orly Taitz) is that "privacy" of the President is equivalent with national security.  Note that Orly Taitz suddenly has a consideration for appointment as a Federal judge position in the liberal 9th Circuit District of the United States.

  Any other questions? 
  • 

    1 darkstar > Malcolm September 10, 2014 at 4:48pm

    Malcolm:  You know, all info on this guy is SEALED.  He's the Man from Nowhere.
• 

  Avatar September 10, 2014 at 4:59am

  Malcolm, Malcolm, Malcolm...You're going to have to do better than this. Gee...this is from September 2009. What was the outcome? Oh and where is the link to this information???

  Claim:   A federal judge has ordered Barack Obama to prove his eligibility for the presidency in court on 2010.
  

  FALSE

  
  Example:   [Collected via e-mail, September 2009]
  
  

  Very quietly Obama's citizenship case reaches the Supreme Court ...
  Federal Judge Carter sets Trial Date for Obama's Eligibility!
  
  The expedited trial has been set for Jan. 26, 2010!
  
  Many concerned veterans and citizens attended the hearing in Federal Court in in the lawsuit against Barack Obama to determine his eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief. About showed up, almost all in support of the lawsuit to demand that Obama release his birth certificate and other records that he has hidden from the American people.
  
  Judge David Carter refused to hear Obama's request for dismissal. He indicated there was almost no chance that this case would be dismissed. Obama is arguing this lawsuit was filed in the wrong court if you can believe that. Obama would prefer a "kangaroo court" instead of a Federal court! Assuming Judge Carter denies Obama's motion for dismissal, he will likely then order expedited discovery which will force Obama to release his birth certificate in a timely manner (if he has one).
  
  The judge, WHO IS A FORMER U.S. MARINE, repeated several times that this is A VERY SERIOUS CASE which must be resolved quickly so that the troops know that their Commander in Chief is eligible to hold that position and issue lawful orders to our military in this time of war. He basically said OBAMA MUST PROVE HIS ELIGIBILITY to the court! He said Americans deserve to know the truth about their President!
  
  The two U.S. Attorneys representing Barack Obama tried everything they could to sway the judge that this case was frivolous, but Carter would have none of it and cut them off several times. Obama's attorneys left the courtroom after about the hearing looking defeated and nervous.
  
  Great day in America for the U.S. Constitution! The truth about Barack Obama's eligibility will be known fairly soon - Judge Carter practically guaranteed it!

   

  
  Origins:   has acted as counsel in cases of military personnel refusing deployment orders on the grounds that the military's commander-in-chief, President Barack Obama, is not eligible to hold that position. All of those suits have been dismissed, and at the conclusion of one of the more recent cases (Rhodes v. MacDonald), U.S. District Court Judge Land imposed a on as a sanction for her misconduct in violating the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, noting that:

  When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law.
  When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice.

  A similar suit (Barnett v. Obama) recently came before U.S. District Court Judge Carter. Contrary to what is claimed in the example block above, Judge Carter did not "refuse to hear Obama's request for dismissal" of the suit, nor did he order "Obama to release his birth certificate in a timely manner." The referenced case was dismissed by Judge Carter, who concluded his 2009 order granting the defendants' Motion to Dismiss with the following statement:
  

  Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore mandates of the Constitution; to disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by "We the People"— over of the people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism.

  On 9 January 2013, Orly Taitz trumpeted in a press release that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has "scheduled" her case "dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs" to be "heard in conference before the full Supreme Court":
  

  Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

  As noted by others familiar with the workings of the Supreme Court, this development does not mean that Dr. Taitz's case will be actually be discussed at a conference of all court members, or that she will be appearing and making a presentation before the court. The almost certain outcome is that her application will be routinely denied without comment, as all her previous applications have been:
  

  Roberts could have denied the stay on his own [as Justice Kennedy already did], but Orly could then have presented it to each of the other justices, one at a time. So the Court's routine practice is, when a stay or other motion is denied by one justice and then re-submitted to a second justice, the second one will submit it to the full Court (in order to kill it once and for all). That automatically involves having it "listed" for a conference. It is not actually discussed at the conference unless one justice puts it on the "discuss" list; otherwise, it is automatically denied.
  
  If one justice puts this on the discuss list, we will know because then the Justice Department will be asked to respond. But that won't happen.

  Last updated:   20 January 2013

  
  Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/carter.asp#OXclwpAxy1...