By Bernie Suarez
As we approach the end of another year let’s remember that humanity is now subjected to yet another full year of spraying with metal particles. Not just humanity but all the poor creatures on earth are being sprayed; every plant and every tree, the bees and birds, the soil and all the little creatures that live in it, even the fish and inhabitants of the sea are suffering as aluminum, sulfur, barium and other toxic metals pile on everywhere altering the pH of the soil, contaminating the water and attacking the very essence of life on earth.
Yes, chemtrails spraying is this big a deal and as another year goes by the globalists and their military industrial complex marches forward with their insanity to control the weather, deliberately engineering a much cooler planet by literally blocking our sunlight and dumping enough toxic metals all over the planet to explain the destruction and slow death of many crops (i.e. food supply), all to the benefit of companies like Monsanto and the U.S. government.
So, as we wrap another year, let us refresh our memory and lay out 15 points about chemtrails and chembomb spraying that everyone should be mindful of. Points that can be used as a weapon to silence online “contrails” trolls whose only mission is to keep the blind sheep asleep and in doubt about the otherwise plain-to-see in-your-face evidence of the chemtrails/chembomb geoengineering programs which are ongoing. Let’s remind our uneducated friends and online trolls that:
1. Often we see ordinary planes who are not spraying, flying in the same air space and altitude as those who are spraying leaving long trails. Given that “contrails” are dependent predominantly on the temperature and humidity of the surrounding atmosphere at that particular atmospheric pressure (which is measurable), and given that changes don’t occur very quickly in nearby airspace this should offer no less than a head scratch for anyone with an understanding of the issue and willing to apply science, reason and common sense.
2. Planes spraying are almost always unmarked, not ordinary commercial planes with passengers. To this day, no one has filmed an ordinary commercial (labeled) passenger jet spraying. It doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened or is not happening, but it is something to consider. This goes along with the unusual government dual strategy of both:
A. Admitting that spraying is real, it’s necessary, cheap, important, developing and well planned, all in an effort to save the planet.
AND
B. Simultaneously the government and in particular its politicians and media and (Hollywood) TV mouthpieces have made a collective decision to DENY chemtrails spraying 9/11 style. Amazingly, when the issue is brought up to the general public it is said to not be happening and it’s all a “conspiracy”. The unmarked planes is a reminder of their commitment to operating in a clandestine manner while simultaneously advancing their plans and quietly conditioning the scholastic types that these are indeed legitimate programs to save the earth.
3. Planes that are spraying almost always fly with transponders off. One can verify flight data information by logging on to a site like flightaware.com and look for the plane when it flies over. Rarely if ever, will you see the plane show up on the website flight listing, because it is not sending out signals. This speaks again to their commitment to secrecy and denial.
4. Spraying planes seem to fly in senseless patterns. They often fly in directions not commonly known for commercial flight including making U-turns and sharp turns.
5. Easily verifiable money-making weather modification and atmosphere-manipulating patents are available for anyone to review. These are not conspiracies or secret rumors, these are real patents. These patents are in use or they wouldn’t exist.
6. Spraying planes don’t follow any order of nature with respect to temperature and humidity (important to the “contrails” claims). Unlike a natural (“contrails”) event, the chemtrails we see being sprayed in our skies sometimes every day follow no set temperatures or humidity. In Southern California, for example, we see spraying regardless of whether the temperature on the ground is 50, 70, or 90 degrees Fahrenheit. We also see the spraying at very low and very high humidity. This disjointed pattern with nature’s temperature and humidity is a stark contrast to what government geoengineers claim is the nature of contrails. All supposed government “contrails” studies show that “contrails” will only form under certain specific temperatures and humidity in accordance to the rules of nature. In other words, according to the rules of nature there are set temperatures and humidities that guarantee no contrails. These temperatures and humidities unfortunately never translate over to reality when one applies the Environmental Lapse Rate (ELR) formula to the known current temperature on the ground to calculate the temperature at plane altitude level.
7. Jets that spray our skies can often be seen to stop their spraying suddenly then restart seconds later. Something characteristic of a deliberate shutting off or perhaps a pause to change chemical canister from which the chemicals are being drawn. With contrails on the other hand we would expect a smooth steady continuation of the condensation trail being created by (supposedly) the ice crystals that (supposedly) form spontaneously from the combustion of ordinary jet fuel. This is not at all what we see when we look up.
8. Throughout the year anyone can easily predict when the chemtrails will stop. In regions with very steady climate as in Southern California, this prediction is based strictly on observation of their spraying schedule not on the temperature or humidity. Hot or cold, we will see spraying throughout the year, and we’ll see the spraying (predictably) stop at specific times of the year.
9. We can observe weather patterns that are often inconsistent with the established weather forecast. The difference? The spraying of the sky. Often the forecast calls for sunshine and blue skies and we’ll observe the planes ruin the sky leaving cloudy overcast skies instead. A sharp difference from the predicted weather.
10. There are known weather modification private companies who admit they manipulate the sky for the purposes of weather modification. This information is public, real and easily verifiable.
11. Attempt at cloud seeding, weather modification, engineered drought, rain making and other manipulation and geoengineering of our skies is admitted by government agents, educators, geoengineers and other entities all claiming it’s for the purposes of “global warming” and planet cooling. This admission is nonetheless the proof these programs are ongoing.
12. Patents for specifically aluminum-resistant seeds are secured by the USDA and promoted by Monsanto. A bizarre coincidence if this is not related to spraying programs which also employ the spraying of aluminum in the sky that eventually falls back to the ground.
13. Photographs of our skies prior to 2000 show little to no lines in the sky. Everyone with a photo collection has this proof in their hands.
14. Where is the documentation of protesters protesting sky lines back in the 1990s? How about the 1980s, ’70s, ’60s, ’50s etc? Where is the history of genuine writers (not government scientists), authors of books and activists writing about the problem of lines in the sky? Where are the photos of activists packing the streets protesting sky lines in the 1970s? Did no one care about the environment back then?? These images and activist literature don’t exists because movements only occur to address things that are actually happening in that generation. Chemtrails and sky lines are actually happening now thus we NOW have a movement to address this serious issue.
15. Trolls and disinformation agents claim ordinary planes have always made persistent contrails when they combust fuel and these trails inevitably change our weather and global climate as a result and block our sunlight. These wild claims suggest that dating back to the Wright brothers’ invention of the first plane; the invention turned out to be a weapon of mass destruction. As bizarre as this sounds, this shifting of the blame for the destruction of our skies from today’s U.S. government, U.S Air Force, the DOD and all its private contractors and accomplice allies to the Wright brothers is inescapably at the root of their argument. Also at the root of this argument is that blue skies were never the norm even in sunny southern California or Hawaii due to natural contrails formation. This bizarre argument of course is a psyop on those who are unaware of the issue; and the younger generations who are now being conditioned to believe this statement is true and that massive weird feathery and smudgy looking clouds injected in the stratosphere and troposphere with chemical trails flown into them is normal.
One thing we should all keep in mind about chemtrails/chembomb spraying is that the military owns this issue. Activists have as much chance of stopping the U.S. Military Industrial Complex as they do of stopping chemtrails. The battle we face is a very long one, and de-funding the U.S. military – in particular the U.S.A.F. – may be one option for stopping this. To stop chemtrails we’ll need other countries and power figures to step in to help. The depth of brainwashing, TV and mainstream media hypnosis and conditioning that Americans are under makes this an even more concerning issue. All hands are needed on deck to push back against the U.S. Military Industrial Complex on this issue.
I firmly believe chemtrails/chembombs spraying is by far the greatest challenge humanity faces and could very well seal its doom. Help spread awareness of this issue, don’t give up and keep doing what you can to expose this issue.
As I’ve stated many times, those of us who are alive now are firsthand eyewitnesses to this crime against humanity. We are that generation that people 200 years from now would love to interview regarding the legend of the blue skies which by then will be a fairytale. Future generations will not even know that there was a time when the sky was plain blue without any lines in the sky. They will be so conditioned to see the artificial manipulation of our skies they will not have a clue that blue skies were once the norm.
Save your personal evidence for future generations. I urge everyone to store and preserve all your childhood photos of plain blue skies and keep them somewhere safe. Make copies of your old photos if possible, you have no idea how valuable these will be to someone in the future.
As for us here and now, we cannot take the Military Industrial Complex head on but we can strategize other steps for fighting back including filing lawsuits and writing letters at least if only for the sake of keeping a physical record of our protest recorded in government records. Also write about this crime in articles, blogs and books especially. This will leave a trail of literature for future generations to see.
About the Author
Bernie Suarez is an activist, critical thinker, radio host, musician, M.D, Veteran, lover of freedom and the Constitution, and creator of the Truth and Art TV project. He also has a background in psychology and highly recommends that everyone watch a documentary titled The Century of the Self. Bernie has concluded that the way to defeat the New World Order is to truly be the change that you want to see. Manifesting the solution and putting truth into action is the very thing that will defeat the globalists.
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/12/these-15-arguments-will-destroy.html
Comments
When identifying dangerous compounds in our environment, the following procedure is mostly used:
1. Find the pollutant
2. Source the pollutant
3. Inform the Public/Police
When it comes to the chemtrail-people they seem to be doing it in this order instead:
1. Inform the Public/Police
2. Source the pollutant
3. Find the pollutant
Although, after more than 10 years they still have not reached point 3.
Nobody have simply been able to show these chemicals in an identifyable manner.
@rev
"AO ,who's side are you on."
The side that won't let itself be brainwashed by supersticion, hearsay and poorly constructed secteric material from the University of Youtube.
"This is not about Contrails but Chemtrails."
There's no such thing as Chemtrails, the trails you are seeing ARE contrails.
""Contrails" is water vapor released by the jet and creates a small tail that follows the jet."
You know my dear and very annoying lost lamb, I've already addressed the physical impossibilities of chemtrails in my bigger reply below. Meet those arguments instead of repeating the tripe I've already addressed.
In the physics you're trying to teach right now, regular clouds would be impossible.
Go back to being a priest and leave the physics lessons to the scientists, eh? ;)
"Chemtrail" on the other hand is poison chemicals put in with the fuel and is burnt"
I'll ask the question again then: How can metal particles pass through a jet engine without destroying it? Have you ever seen the inside of a jet engine? (I've built one, and I can tell you right now that metal particles in the fuel wouldn't work).
And, how can the spraying planes be bigger on the inside than they are on the outside, as a trail longer than 1 mile is impossible to create with spraying?
"when the chemtrails hit the earth they are designed to slowly Kill all living things."
We've had trails in the sky since 1944. If they are designed to kill, they're doing a lousy job since the population have doubled since then.
In combination with all the other pollution we've had for hundreds of years, we should ALL be dead now. What went wrong?
"They also contain Nano-bots"
If that were true they could be detected easily. Where are all the vids of people magnifying a sample of air to show all these bots floating around?
"breath in the body and begin to attack it and turn it or us into a Trans-humans"
You push and push and push your arguments while ignoring all explanations for your paranoid delusions. If I didn't know any better I'd believe I were in a strip-club right now.
I'm just waiting for your argument about Space Insectoids that will be coming here to eat everyone who've eaten meat in their lives..
If you don't believe that then maybe you should, because that's the info I got in my face the last time I debunked chemtrails. He too talked about nano bots, but mostly about all the insectioids that are apparently on their way here to eat meat-eaters.
"Oh My !!"
Indeed. Postulate after postulate but where you totally ignore the explanations already given while you repeat the ones already addressed. May God NOT forgive you.
You're a human but you're using no more braincells than a Parrot when you talk here.
Ben should put up a sign that says: Don't let your pets post replies.
One would think a sign like that wouldn't be needed in a place for adults but.. Here we are.
"Adonai"
He left you a LONG time ago. It's Lucifer who walks with You nowadays. Disguised as something else, perhaps a teacher of some sort...?
I advice you to fire him before you get convinced that you're being eaten alive by microscopic space lizards.
You are to be forgiven, AO for answering and I would have been so disappointed if you hadn't. ;) I guess you could say this was set as a little trap for you to see if you'd respond. LOL Thanks for not disappointing and good job.
I know I promised to stop commenting on the things I believe be deceitful BS, but I've been asked to stay and keep doing it, so here goes. :)
I reserve myself for spelling- and sentence errors. I don't have time to check all today.
"1. Often we see ordinary planes who are not spraying, flying in the same air space and altitude as those who are spraying leaving long trails."
No, they're not in the same space.
For a commercial airliner, separation will usually be at least 3 miles laterally, or 1,000 feet vertically.
Rules and regulations make sure of that since the turbulence from an airliner is so grand that it can bring other planes down if they come too close.
It's almost impossible to determine distance when looking up from the ground at an object in the air.
"2. Planes spraying are almost always unmarked, not ordinary commercial planes with passengers. To this day, no one has filmed an ordinary commercial (labeled) passenger jet spraying."
That is simply a blatant lie that's also easily disproven.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLuUwzYhWA4
"3. Planes that are spraying almost always fly with transponders off."
No, all contrail-planes I've seen so far have had their transponders ON. They're also fully visible on "flightradar"-sites.
"One can verify flight data information by logging on to a site like flightaware.com"
Indeed, and that site just proved you wrong when I searched the latest "trail"-plane.
"4. Spraying planes seem to fly in senseless patterns. They often fly in directions not commonly known for commercial flight including making U-turns and sharp turns."
The funny thing is that all flight-routes were adjusted in the late 90's and the ammount of air traffic have doubled many times since then, whereas you will be seeing new flight patterns every year.
"5. Easily verifiable money-making weather modification and atmosphere-manipulating patents are available for anyone to review."
There are patents for everything. My personal favourite is the one on regular corn, that were supposed to monopolize the use of corn globally, but didn't. ;)
5 is an associative argument with no tanglible connection in between.
"These are not conspiracies or secret rumors, these are real patents."
You have yet to show the relevance of them though.
And, not all patents describe functioning technologies. A patent is nothing but a proof of intellectual property. It does not verify nor acknowledge the invevention. It only acknowledges the idea of it.
"These patents are in use or they wouldn’t exist."
Whether a patent exists or not have nothing to do whether the idea in it is being used or not.
As I said, there are patents for everything. Some are being used, most are not.
"6. Spraying planes don’t follow any order of nature with respect to temperature and humidity"
Actually they do. When temperature and humidity doesn't allow for clouds to be formed, no airplanes can make contrails in that area.
"the chemtrails we see being sprayed in our skies sometimes every day follow no set temperatures or humidity."
Yes they do, but since you don't have a hygrometer in your house you simply do not notice the patterns that are there.
"In Southern California, for example, we see spraying regardless of whether the temperature on the ground is 50, 70, or 90 degrees Fahrenheit."
But, there's often a "slight" difference in temperature between 1 feet and 10 thousand feet.
What you measure on the ground have little to do with what you can measure high in the air.
The humidity however is easier to measure that way. It doesn't shift as fast as the temperature and is often the same on the ground as it is in the air.
"7. Jets that spray our skies can often be seen to stop their spraying suddenly then restart seconds later."
Yes, and the exdlanation for this is that temperatures can vary from yard to yard in the air unless there's no wind at all (which can't happen for as long as the earth is spinning).
"Something characteristic of a deliberate shutting off or perhaps a pause to change chemical canister from which the chemicals are being drawn."
Lovely that you gave me that opening too.
You know, the ammount of solution that would be needed to cause all these trails, would require millions of Hercules planes every hour. There's simply not enough room in an airplane to be able to form a trail longer than a mile or so.
"8. Throughout the year anyone can easily predict when the chemtrails will stop."
Indeed. As easily as we can predict the days where water in the air will not condense into clouds.
"9. We can observe weather patterns that are often inconsistent with the established weather forecast."
Yes, predicting the weather is not an exact science. They're often wrong. I've even had thunderstorms when the news promised sun.
They get better though, as time goes by and better satellites and better calculation algorithms become available, but they still have a LONG way to go there.
All it takes to set off a weather prediction is one "unschedueled" solar eruption. :)
"The difference? The spraying of the sky."
Are you kidding?
Weather reports have been off since the dawn of meteorology. And, metreology is a far older practice that the practice of human flight.
"10. There are known weather modification private companies who admit they manipulate the sky for the purposes of weather modification."
But only in local areas and with time "honored" methods.
Noone have so far presented a method for adjusting the atmosphere over an entire country.
"11. Attempt at cloud seeding, weather modification, engineered drought, rain making and other manipulation and geoengineering"
Attempted and failed, except over small, local areas. China seed clouds every year for instance, for the rice-production. Without it, they wouldn't be able to sustain the industry.
"This admission is nonetheless the proof these programs are ongoing."
It's however, NOT proof that it's being done on a global scale using airplanes that are masked as passenger planes.
Guilt by association wen't out with the Communism. Don't bring it back, please! That'd make you an ISIS-supporter and therefore, "whackable". (Reasoning: ISIS believes in conspiracy theories about the US and so do you, therefore, you must be exactly alike). It doesn't sound quite right does it? ;)
"12. Patents for specifically aluminum-resistant seeds are secured by the USDA and promoted by Monsanto."
It is well known that high levels of aluminium in soil can be harmful to plants, and since aluminium is the most common partly toxic base elements we have in the ground, it's most likely that it is That which will affect your plants. Aluminium springs form the ground, naturally.
"A bizarre coincidence if this is not related to spraying programs which also employ the spraying of aluminum in the sky that eventually falls back to the ground."
If there were powdered aluiminium in the air you'd know, since it would burn your lungs and convert them into a goo'y mess that would smell like something from a graveyard and look like a pot-roast.
Not to mention all the fires that would start everywhere. Raw, powdered aluminium is VERY flamable and reacts with everything from skin to pure water.
"13. Photographs of our skies prior to 2000 show little to no lines in the sky."
That is simply not true and your attempt of even saying it suggests suggestive memory-manipulation.
This picture from WW2 kind of says it all there.
http://www.chemtards.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ww2.jpg
"Everyone with a photo collection has this proof in their hands."
I were bugged by contrails when I was a small kid, in the 80's. I remember being pissed about the fact that they sometimes mushed out over the entire sky, stealing my blue sky.
I never photoed them though. Digital cameras didn't exist back then and a photo cost about $1 per picture, so naturally, we only took picture of the things we thought be relevant.
"14. Where is the documentation of protesters protesting sky lines back in the 1990s?"
There were none.
People didn't want to give up flying just to be able to have a totally clear, blue sky every now and then
If you want to get rid of contrails, it means you'll also have to give up your current lifestyle of consuming foreign goods, being able to travel overseas in less than 3 months, doing business with other people than the ones in your home village, and so on.
"Where is the history of genuine writers (not government scientists), authors of books and activists writing about the problem of lines in the sky?"
There's may be one or two but, since noone have been interested in giving up the western lifestyle just to get 50 days of completely blue sky every year, you won't find those books on the Amazon, basically because noone would buy them.
But you're always free to write your own book about it, have it printed and put online for a test on how many you'd sell.
"Where are the photos of activists packing the streets protesting sky lines in the 1970s?"
Since sky lines are seen as perfectly natural phenomena of air-traffic there's little to no reason going out protesting them, don't you think?
It'd be like, protesting solar spots. You CAN do it and at least one tabloid would probably come, but.. You'd look like an idiot. Few people are prepared to do that in public. ;)
"Did no one care about the environment back then??"
yes they did, but Internet didn't exist back then whereas people had the knowledge in their heads instead of on wikipedia, and they also took their degrees in atmospheric science in physical schools instead of the The University of Youtube.
People were more knowledgable back then, in short.
All you need to render an 18 year old completely ignorant and without references today, is to smash his cell-phone. ;)
Point 15 made no sense at all so I'm not even going to adress that one. ;)
Yes, we will, Feather!
We sure will be strong when we get through all of this..
You're welcome, Rev. I live out in the middle of nowhere and sometimes the sky is covered with chemtrails...they're trying to kill or harm us in one way or another.
Got cut off. Strange it posted itself. anyway thats why I posted the DC poem for X-MAS, trying to warn people. Silver water seems to be the only thing that works for me to keep me alive after all these years of heavy Chem-trail spraying !!!!Adonai
Keep up the good work. I have posting on this for years but they don't want to listen or believe, sad to say. They have been spraying us intensely for Christ-mass. They have been spraying the whole world sense Oct. 1998 and its worse on the Holidays. Hard times ahead, especially if we don't do something to stop them. Thats why
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next