You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Latest Activity
"With the risk of boring ACC members, I asked my 'personal' AI to write a short tale about my ancient descendant-Niall of the Nine Hostages from Ireland
🛡️ A Very Short Tale of Niall
In the mist-laced hills of ancient Éire, a warrior named Niall rose…"
🛡️ A Very Short Tale of Niall
In the mist-laced hills of ancient Éire, a warrior named Niall rose…"
"Drexk-are you for or against BRICS?
Massive New Tariffs Against BRICS Countries As Their New Central Bank Cross Currency System Launches & Challenges The Supremacy Of The US Dollar, Warns Top Economist Kirk Elliott…"
Massive New Tariffs Against BRICS Countries As Their New Central Bank Cross Currency System Launches & Challenges The Supremacy Of The US Dollar, Warns Top Economist Kirk Elliott…"
"God help any country where the Vatican would hold sway again. Buggery and satanism runs rampant through Vatican City."
"Starmer and his international law chums are a total disgrace....It is obvious that he wants us back under Brussels diktat.....He is the "Queen Mary I" of our times, (and her attitudes towards restoring the rule of catholicism and Popes....reversing…"
"❌Untenable❌........In the UK we are repeating the fiscal history of a previous Labour government's mismanagement, that of 1976, which lead to an IMF bailout...and it's on course to happen again...but on a higher turn of the debt spiral...at the end…"
"⚠️🇬🇧To analyse the UK's current dilemmas under it's Labour regime, we can conclude that this nation is subject to the rule of lawyers, rather than the rule of law...And particularly left-wing international lawyers, obsessed with "human rights" for…"
Comments
MOTIVATION
Given that an electrically charged particle such as an electron have size, what does it keep its various parts from ripelling each other? Think about this considering that similar charges ripell each other. The model is that an electron is a pack of infinitely many infinitesmall electrically charged subparticles (or subtrons) unless a strong force keep them together, the subtrons will endlessly repell each other, approaching nothingness. This repulsion releases the stored energy. So how much is this energy?
The best force that can hold the electron against its own electrostatic self repulsion (hence destruction) is MAGNETISM. To do that, electron must spin. Spinning charge can be seen as an electric current. This give rise to z-pinch, holding the particle together in a toroidal shape. The z-pinch force is given by:
F=l^2/2pu
F=force,
I=electric current (due to spinning)
p=pie
u=magnetic permeability
These parts also repell each other via columb's force given by:
F=q^2/4per^2
q=electric charge
e=electric permitivity
Now current, I=dq/dt (dq is amount of charge passing by during small change it time, dt). If the spinning is steady, then dq/dt=q/t. So I^2=(q/t)^2 the z pinching force, F=ma, now becomes
ma=(q/t)^2/2pu
but r=(at^2)/2 i.e if the charge acelerates till it touch eact other, let it to have take time t. Put this together and we have
m=q^2/4pru
But to ballance things up, the collumb force must quicly take back the charg to where it was some distance r away. To do that it must thus store energy of E=Fr=q^2/4pre (from columb's force). Then use mass for q^2/4pru and you get E=m/ue. From Maxwell's theory, we know that 1/ue=c^2
The reasoning is that if length is contracted as seen from one frame, then things appears to accelerate slowlier as though they were heavier. Einstein says this mean mass is bigger in that frame. But this is wrong! Doing so makes the equation f=ma true by DEFINITION. Specifically, Einstein is defining mass as m=f/a, a definition for INERTIA. Rather mass as QUANTITY OF MATTER isn't expressible via an equation.
First I must teach you simple calculus. Consider the equation:
E=m'c^2{1-(v/c)^2}^(1/2) that is to say m'c^2 multiplied by the squar root of the value {1-(v/c)^2}
then {E/m'c^2}^2=1-(v/c)^2
now if velocity, v changes by tiny amount, write it dv, energy changes by some tiny amount, write it dE, so we have
{(E dE)/m'c^2}^2=1-{(v dv)/c}^2
expand things to get:
(E^2 2EdE dE^2)/(m'c^2)^2=1-(v2 2vdv dv^2)/c^2
since dE is soo small, dE^2 is even far smaller that we can neglect it. Same applies to dv^2. So we remain with:
(E/m'c^2)^2 2EdE/(m'c^2)^2=1-(v/c)^2 2vdv/c^2
but (E/m'c^2)^2=1-(v/c)^2 so this cancels themselves out and we remain with
EdE=(m'c^2)^2vdv/c^2=(m'c)^2vdv
But E=m'c^2{1-(v/c)^2}^(1/2)
so dE=m'vdv/{1-(v/c)^2}^(1/2)
but we can understand change in energy, dE as a constant force f times small change in distance. That is
dE =fdx
but f=ma=mdv/dt (newton's second law of motion) so
dE=mdxdv/dt=mvdv (dx/dt=v)
subtitute this in the above equation and we simply get
m=m'/{1-(v/c)^2}^(1/2)
which is the lorentz transform for mass. So reasoning backwards, we say that given the Lorentz transform for mass, it follows logically that
E=m'c^2{1-(v/c)^2}
This is indead the correct form of E'=m'c^2 as energy too have its own Lorentz transform as
E=E'{1-(v/c)2}^(1/2)
My derivation appears very long sinse I did not assume that you know INTEGRAL CALCULUS.