For years and years, people who have expertized themselves in exposing scam artists have often been termed conspiracy theorists. Yet no one can deny that some theories people have are simply so untrue that they cannot be considered as possessing any remote sense or aspect of truth whatsoever. The very term ´conspiracy theorist´means ´someone who theorizes about a plot to conspire a con´, or something akin. Or at least ´people who theorize about people breathing together about something´- that is, focusing their energy on doing something which will usually go against public interest. Imagine a scenario where Ponzi would be in charge, and where he´s running a little known company whose name is David Icke Books. Would it then have been a silly thing to do to expose him? Is it morally wrong to expose Ponzi Scam Artists? Is it morally wrong to expose Matrix Scam Artists? Or is it morally wrong to expose Pyramid Scheme Developers? Just google; ´Pyramid Scheme´and you´ll learn quickly how Pyramid Schemes work.
Google as well ´Ponzi´, and most people have done so already to find out how Swindling and Scamming machines operate in a world whose technology has in fact made it easier rather than more difficult for such people to scam money out of guillable people and have it carried away into Oblivion where it´ll never be seen again. Indeed, what´d be the state of the World today if,say, Ponzi Investigators had been arrested by the Police for trying to prey into the activities of ´a truly Great Man´? What´d have been the State of the World today if the term ´Conspiracy Theorist´had been put into use before Ponzi was born to describe persons expertizing themselves in Scam Artist Research? What´d it have been like if today´s children and their grandchildren had never heard of Ponzi because of a centrally controlled media designed to keep the very name of Ponzi and his likes out of public memory, presenting nothing but Imagery of him clapping children on their heads, feeding dogs with dogfood, cats with catfood, and birds with birdfood, and Aquarium fish with Aquarium fishfood? What´d the world be like if you were not allowed to talk about Ponzi and if you complained about a Nigerian Post, you´d be called a Racist? If the people who started their investigation into Ponzi which eventually led to his federal arrest would had all had their possessions confiscated, then be put on trial and arrested and all their supporters called Conspiracy Theorists and Racists or even Anti - Semites, it´d have been vastly more difficult for a small group of dedicated, brave souls to expose him. But sooner or later, the Ponzi Scheme would have become part of human history because of the nature of how it works.
I am yet not attempting to ask any Icke supporter here to change their views on ´Icke´. Nor am I trying to ask them to adopt some other view to suit my needs. I´d then probably have to have vast numbers of files sent to me on my computer where I am asked to give detailed information on which opinion each ´Icke´supporter should have - a ridiculous piece of nonsense - good graceous! My goodness me! Many years ago anybody who knew me knew that I was an Icke fan - now it´s 2013, and most people change their opinions and I am certainly not immune from that. I used to believe earlier though, that most of the Information he was sending was the literal truth - until for example his Moon Info came out. The Moon, according to him, is supposed to be responsible for how my favourite Roastbeef Sandwich tastes. And when that wasn´t a good enough explanation for how - he simply put the origins of the way Roastbeef Sandwiches taste vastly further away. Now the planet Saturn governs the origins and nature of taste rather than our abilities to discern individually what we think is the reason for why we have a particular taste. And Immanuel Kant, one of the world´s most respected experts on the subject of Taste in his book Critique of Judgement is rarely mentioned.
Yet why, according to some of ´David Icke´s´fans here, do I have to ´go in peace´when I tell them that I simply don´t have the same opinions as this man and that I am only explaining my reasons for not being able to have all of his opinions peacefully? If ´David Icke´is a scam, and one is not supposed to criticize him any longer because doing so would be bad for David Icke Books - was the decision to investigate, prosecute and arrest Ponzi morally wrong too?
I am starting to conclude that perhaps all of mankind shouldn´t have access to time travel technology though I certainly support that every country in the World should publish Sci - Fi and Time Travel Books.
Maybe I am such an evil person that I should ´go in peace´because I believe that it was the morally right thing to do to expose Ponzi though I am not asking as of present that David Icke Books should be closed. The conclusion I draw from my argument against allowing Ponzi to roam free in his own time is because people´d have learnt nothing about the nature of Ponzi Schemes in that period until a long time later.
Comments