Spiritual Blogs

What Should Be Science Default Regarding Afterlife Question?

Posted by Roaring Lovely on June 29, 2016 at 11:30am
This is a question of onus of proof. Another way to put it is what is an 'extraordinary claim' in this case? Is it to claim that there is no life after death or to claim that there is life after death? The automatic answer of course is that a scientist should demand that the onus is on the person claiming that there is an afterlife to prove so. However, I will here overturn the tables rightside up. It is an extraordinary claim to say that there is no afterlife!The morden scientific stand is that it is the onus of the one making positive claim to prove the claim. Then because 'no' in the 'there is NO afterlife' is a negation, then it is thought that the negation of afterlife requires no proof. However, this is too simplistic. If the claim negates that which is consistent with facts, then the onus shifts to the one negating to explain and/or prove why it cannot happen. For instance what if I claim that there are NO rocks in the interior of the moon? This is a negation and yet the mainstream science's default stand is that there are rocks in the moon. It is the onus of the one denying it to explain to us why moon should lack this faculty.In fact there is a very popular claim amongst physicists that 'if it is not forbiden, then it is compulsory'. From physics, we know that if something CAN happen, then it MUST happen! So from physics insight, our task reduces to merely showing that an afterlife does not violet any law of physics. Once we do that, the ball shifts neatly to the other side of the net. What is it that will constantly prevent something from happening for all of the eternity if it CAN happen?But showing that afterlife does not violet any law of physics is a no brainer. If 'life before death' does not violet any law of physics, then 'life after death' cannot possibly violet any law of physics. Laws of physics does not change with time. A fancy way of putting it is that laws of physics are invariant under time coordinate translation. Therefore there is no reason from physics to maintain a 'no afterlife' as a default position any more than there is a reason to maintain that there is no remagnetisation of a demagnetised piece of iron. The question is what will it indefinitely prevent the second magnetisation if nothing indefinitely prevented the first magnetisation?You should be able to note that we donnot ask what will make the afterlife to happen. We rather ask what it will prevent it from happening. In other words, the default possition is that of things happening and not that of things not happening. The mindset changes from: 'if nothing makes things to happen, then they cannot happen' to 'if nothing prevent things from happening, then they must happen'. An object for instance was innitially moving until something prevented it from moving. That is why an apparently standing still object is infact moving at c so that it has an energy of E=MC2. We donnot perceive it to move simply because we are moving together with it from 'past' to 'future'.So from our lives at the present moment, we know that life is possible. However, we donnot know of a future state wherein life will not be there. Contrary to how you may think, there is utterly no meaning in the words: there is no afterlife. This has something to do with the fact that the supposed eternal lack of life is in the future. The meaning of a lack of one's own awareness though can but only be illustrated as an event of the past. Past and future though are assymmetric as a matter of fact. This mean that the attempted illustration of the future eternal lack of experience by lickening it to a dreamless sleep is fallacious. This is because what it means to have a dreamless sleep can but only come out as a state that happens BEFORE a state of consciousness. However, we cannot use a meaning that assumes an experience and a lack of experience of past to illustrate it as a meaning of a lack of experience in future whence it is impossible to perceive it as a state in the past. This is contradictory.
Views: 72
E-mail me when people leave their comments –
Follow

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Latest Blog Posts

Most Popular Blog Posts

Blog Topics by Tags

  • - (955)

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

Movella commented on AlternateEarth's blog post The Story of Pharoah Taursret- Audio Clip
"Thanks Andro! That sounds interesting, I’ll look into it.."
23 minutes ago
AlternateEarth commented on AlternateEarth's blog post The Story of Pharoah Taursret- Audio Clip
"Thanks Andromedaner-"
6 hours ago
Andromedaner Z commented on AlternateEarth's blog post The Story of Pharoah Taursret- Audio Clip
"I just watched "The Mummy" with Rachel Weisz and had to listen to the excerpt from the Audio book. Sounds great AE!

This Movella, reminds me of Dorothy Eady (Omm Sety), a British woman who remembered to be an Egyptian priestess from Pharaoh Seti…"
12 hours ago
AlternateEarth commented on AlternateEarth's blog post The Story of Pharoah Taursret- Audio Clip
"great voice over"
15 hours ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a status
u exist upon the Earth with great purpose,2 assist n the awakening &ascension of humanity,4 these r the final days of the current realit
17 hours ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
Spirit is Calling You to Remember; I am KejRaj!
 Greetings! From heart to heart in this moment we speak, I am KejRaj!If you are reading this message, it is not by chance but by design. Spirit is reaching out to you. Spirit wants you to remember; You did not incarnate on Earth empty. You arrived…
See More
17 hours ago
Drekx Omega commented on AlternateEarth's blog post The Story of Pharoah Taursret- Audio Clip
"✨✨✨💜🩶💛✨✨✨🛸✨✨✨👏🏻😁Selamat majon...!!𓀎𓀍𓀌𓀀𓀓𓀕𓀋"
17 hours ago
Movella commented on Drekx Omega's blog post Patriots Await The Plan's Final Phase - Justice & Retributions
"Yeah, that’s so true.👌🏻"
17 hours ago
More…

New Forum Posts