What Should Be Science Default Regarding Afterlife Question?

This is a question of onus of proof. Another way to put it is what is an 'extraordinary claim' in this case? Is it to claim that there is no life after death or to claim that there is life after death? The automatic answer of course is that a scientist should demand that the onus is on the person claiming that there is an afterlife to prove so. However, I will here overturn the tables rightside up. It is an extraordinary claim to say that there is no afterlife!The morden scientific stand is that it is the onus of the one making positive claim to prove the claim. Then because 'no' in the 'there is NO afterlife' is a negation, then it is thought that the negation of afterlife requires no proof. However, this is too simplistic. If the claim negates that which is consistent with facts, then the onus shifts to the one negating to explain and/or prove why it cannot happen. For instance what if I claim that there are NO rocks in the interior of the moon? This is a negation and yet the mainstream science's default stand is that there are rocks in the moon. It is the onus of the one denying it to explain to us why moon should lack this faculty.In fact there is a very popular claim amongst physicists that 'if it is not forbiden, then it is compulsory'. From physics, we know that if something CAN happen, then it MUST happen! So from physics insight, our task reduces to merely showing that an afterlife does not violet any law of physics. Once we do that, the ball shifts neatly to the other side of the net. What is it that will constantly prevent something from happening for all of the eternity if it CAN happen?But showing that afterlife does not violet any law of physics is a no brainer. If 'life before death' does not violet any law of physics, then 'life after death' cannot possibly violet any law of physics. Laws of physics does not change with time. A fancy way of putting it is that laws of physics are invariant under time coordinate translation. Therefore there is no reason from physics to maintain a 'no afterlife' as a default position any more than there is a reason to maintain that there is no remagnetisation of a demagnetised piece of iron. The question is what will it indefinitely prevent the second magnetisation if nothing indefinitely prevented the first magnetisation?You should be able to note that we donnot ask what will make the afterlife to happen. We rather ask what it will prevent it from happening. In other words, the default possition is that of things happening and not that of things not happening. The mindset changes from: 'if nothing makes things to happen, then they cannot happen' to 'if nothing prevent things from happening, then they must happen'. An object for instance was innitially moving until something prevented it from moving. That is why an apparently standing still object is infact moving at c so that it has an energy of E=MC2. We donnot perceive it to move simply because we are moving together with it from 'past' to 'future'.So from our lives at the present moment, we know that life is possible. However, we donnot know of a future state wherein life will not be there. Contrary to how you may think, there is utterly no meaning in the words: there is no afterlife. This has something to do with the fact that the supposed eternal lack of life is in the future. The meaning of a lack of one's own awareness though can but only be illustrated as an event of the past. Past and future though are assymmetric as a matter of fact. This mean that the attempted illustration of the future eternal lack of experience by lickening it to a dreamless sleep is fallacious. This is because what it means to have a dreamless sleep can but only come out as a state that happens BEFORE a state of consciousness. However, we cannot use a meaning that assumes an experience and a lack of experience of past to illustrate it as a meaning of a lack of experience in future whence it is impossible to perceive it as a state in the past. This is contradictory.

"Leftie losing it-I thought this was a parody video.

It's not, which makes it even funnier 🤣

https://x.com/LangmanVince/status/1968476116139614330?ref_src=twsrc..."

"Muslim Bros....Not proscribed yet in UK....But Reform UK will do so...once in..

Currently, in the UK, the following have been banned and proscribed...:-

"The UK proscribes terrorist organisations under the Terrorism Act 2000, making it illegal to…"

"I trust my ET brothers and sisters, more than the majority of limited consciousness and low IQ/LQ, Earth people...
In fact, many people on outer Earth, are terrifyingly dangerous..."

Spiritual Blogs

What Should Be Science Default Regarding Afterlife Question?

Comments

Latest Blog Posts

One Rebel Star Should Fall From The EU Flag's Circular Constellation and Rise Anew With Greater and Brighter Light

George Soros Will Be ENDED By The Tide Of History - Karma Does Eventually Catch You Out, George..

Transmission from The Ashtar Command: Motherships in Plain Sight; Channel: Octavia Vasile | Source.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Most Popular Blog Posts

FINALLY THE NEW PAPA SAID IT ! Killing Easter lamb has no basis in the Christian tradition

How Many of These 51 Spiritual Awakening Symptoms Do You Have?

find out if you are a star seed and where you really come from tests.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

Latest Activity

New Forum Posts

The Truth Will Hurt You

Shift & Uplift Your Divine Vibrations With The Violet Flame By Melanie Beckler

Celestial Magic Invocation By Steven Hutchinson

Are Enlightenment and God-Realization the Same?

Note: this page contains paid content.