Dear friends,
In the UK, many of us feel strongly that we don't want to be just another star on someone else's flag..
Things will have to change, as we feel like a prisoner locked in the boot of a car, going the wrong way...WE DEMAND OUR NATION BACK....Time for a change, with regards to the British "star" in Europe...Time for rebellion against the evil empire of the European Union.
The European Union is remote, in terms of caring about our national interests, yet highly intrusive and controlling, in so many areas of the national life...It can override our sovereign Parliament, in London....In terms of legislation created by the unelected Commission and in terms of the European Court rulings...Laws cannot be changed, legitimately....We cannot trade freely with the world, as we once did. We need INDEPENDENCE from the European Union, as so many countries have historically achieved, with regards to our former British Empire...Now it is our turn to fight for sovereignty and independence, the turn of Britons....We, as a nation represented on the European flag, are becoming a restless REBEL STAR, which is not comfortable within the Euro-constellation....Now we must fall off that flag and rise in renewed sovereign independence, as a free United Kingdom, outside of Brussels diktats and rulings, that largely stunt our nation, rather than enhance it...
We must vote to leave the EU on June 23rd and make that date, an historical date for UK independence...Our version of July 4th.....We need a new constellation to shine in. One we can shine brightly within and not suffer a lowered luminance, as forced upon us by Brussels...A one size fits all, in which we are simply another "small" European, among other little European nations....That can never be acceptable to us...We have a long and proud history. We must rebel against Brussels and regain the sovereignty of our United Kingdom...
That independence of the UK, will brighten our national sovereign star, taking us from one defunct Euro-constellation of stars, to a new and worldly constellation of stars, alongside Australia, New Zealand and other Commonwealth lands, under a British Trade Federation, free of tariffs and uniting all our peoples of these lands of common law, language and values...After independence, we could also join up again with EFTA and co-operate to the full with Norway, Iceland and Switzerland....We will be free to choose our national destiny.....
That can only be good and fair for our people and all those who respect national and individual sovereignty.
Vote to LEAVE the EU in June and make this dream of sovereignty and prosperity, manifest...
Thankyou, Drekx Omega
Comments
Furthermore the issue of bias does not necessarily arise in presidential system because the parliament is separate from the head of state. The president is not choosen by the popular party but directly by the people. In electing the MPs, the potentially divisive issues are under consideration. But in electing the president, often the ethnicity issue arises, making the president to try to be fair to all ethnic groups in an attempt to score the most votes. So the president can easily rid himself of any divisive issue, and delegates it to the parliament
Thus I can conclude that in Kenya, the role of president as a head of state is mainly judged by how good they are in bringing together all ethnic communities in harmony. Any bias other than that is not an issue about the president's role as an head of state.
So our history of Parliament and Monarch had to reconcile these conflicting organs of state, somehow and we came up with the "CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY" system of devolved powers, between head of state and political leader, now Prime Minister.....In ancient times Pharaohs and Kings had Viziers...The Ottomans being a good example....So the concept of a head of state and a political leader/PM/Vizier, is not a new one....
One excellent feature of this system in which a Monarch may be apolitical and "above the mess of political decisions," is our system and maybe that also works with some republics, such as Kenya and Moi...BUT, I fear that in Great Britain, we would have difficulties appointing a politician of any sort, into the role of head of state, because they would be seen to represent a bias...a party...a policy failure...a past tense policy, now superceded...etc...
So an apolitical monarch suits us better....As I said, imagine Blair...But that was not only due to his Iraq debacle and it's "dodgy dossier" schemes to get the UK into a war, that we should not have been in and under false pretences...But he was a Labour party politician and many of us on the right, could never view him as impartial...Even now, he cannot remain neutral on any issue...As "president" (God forbid,) he would be a monster.....
So, we prefer a monarchy, to a republic.....It seems to work well here and is popular.....King Charles III knows this and has vowed to be apolitical, henceforth, as our Constitution (1690) demands of him...
Hehe...!!! Idi Amin.....?? Now he was brutal.....I agree, not a man of the people...
Some republics combine the offices of Prime Minister with Head of State.....Making a PRESIDENT...
The USA is a good example....
And we also had that example in the Third Reich, in which Chancellor Hitler combined his office with the President, following Hindenburg's death in 1934.....Obviously he named that combined office "Fuhrer." Emulating the "Kaisar" of the earlier Reich, albeit he had a functioning Chancellor...
So all countries have a mix of differing systems...The French Fifth Republic, has a President (Emmanuel Macron) and Prime Minister (Elisabeth Borne.) The Germans have a President (Frank-Walter Steinmeier) and Chancellor (Olaf Scholz,) under their current Federal Republic, system....
Whatever suits the people I say....
"The same would probably apply for the UK, if we had a president, in the role of head of state...Imagine the awful spectacle of a "President Tony Blair," for example...?? 😲
"
My reply:
Please clarify the difference. Let me use war in Iraq as an example. Who authorized the sending of troops to Iraq in collaboration with US. Was it the 'head of state' or was it 'the prime minister'. In what sense does this decision steming from a separate 'head of state' from 'head of government' differs from what George bush did?
Or I may ask: if the 'head of state' has no ability to stop an 'head of government' from ordering an heinous act, does it matter that such an 'head of state' exist?
It seems that the pple who can stop a corrupt prime minister are 'pressure' from his fellow politicians, e.g. in the case of Boris Johnson where the cabinet resigned and brought the government to a standstill all while the 'Queen' was completely silent.
This issue brings me to the question of politics and its relevance to such issues. In a system like that of US, the question of whether or not a president is corrupt is a legal question, and not a political one, or so is it called. So having a corrupt 'head of state' is no big issue as long as there exist a just, supreme court. So a corrupt supreme court is a truely problematic issue, but not a 'corrupt head of state'.
This also may bring me to a definition of 'head of state', be it a 'functional' and/or 'ostensive' definition. To me, when we say 'the president is the head of state of country x', we mean 'the president is the spokesman of of country x', or at least that is one of the crucial roles of an head of state . It is the kind of role that you notice when it is said 'Kenya condem Ukraine invasion'. So to me, when some media or whatever insists that 'Kenya condemned Russia', we can know that this is a fat lie because we did not hear such an atterance from Kenya's head of state. On the other hand if I heard one such a leader says so in my country, I might consider voting him out since he has failed to represent me accurately as a citizen of that country. In other words, and according to me, the president in question has failed in his role as the head of state but without necessarily having failed in his role as the 'head of government'. So for the electorates, it will be a matter of weighing on priorities. Thus we put it all on an elected individual so that both the role of 'head of state' and 'head of government' are accountable to the public without necessarily burdening the country with more salaries for two jobs that can be done by a single person.
"Steve Baker Gets KEY Ministerial Role In EU Showdown."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVy9Qmu4scE
King Charles III has made a speech in which he announces that he will henceforth forgo his previous commitments to left-wing charities and woke causes, which many of us have viewed as political bias and WEF propaganda...He will no longer be making statements of support, in the alarmist environmental movement, the WEF, et al.....This is good, as since 1690, a British constitutional monarch, as he is, should be neutral and impartial....👍🏻
Welcome news and on that basis I can announce my fidelity to the new sovereign....
🎖️🎖️🎖️🎖️🎖️🎖️🎖️
✨✨✨"Long Live The King....!!"✨✨✨
The recent ceremony at St James palace, proclaims the new sovereign....Hurrah....!! The coronation ceremony consolidates that proclamation....and is forthcoming...
"First public Proclamation of the new sovereign, King Charles III, from St James’s Palace."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEjWiN7c1ZI
This policy will apply for 2-years, while the UK gets back up to speed, by exploiting natural resources on land (fracking) and under the North sea (gas and oil...) There will also be an end to green levies on fuel bills...She said a moritorium..But it will lead to these green taxes being dropped, as they are so absurd...And her policy is to eventually become a net energy exporter, which is not possible under the green agenda, she is dismantling.
So, for the next 2-years, and especially the winter months, Britons will not freeze to death, on the altar of net-zero posturing...👏
There will also be a greater use of coal and nuclear....With the small and safe reactors...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwhOizl0sJ4
Now, with the public and businesses facing higher energy bills, this winter, an emergency energy strategy will be implemented by the new PM, Liz Truss and the ever able Jacob Rees-Mogg.....
Through the need for sheer survival, this is leading us away from the "net-zero" rubbish and back into sane energy strategies....based on realism and pragmatism...👏
Actually, the British isles are well-endowed, with natural resources. We need to re-activate the drilling programs..Increase production of gas and oil, for the home market...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7B-7SI_zgc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmhcTGogDFU
Nevertheless, we do have some good news, in so far as the UK's forthcoming and patriotic Prime Minister, Liz Truss, whom I had earlier endorsed, is in opposition to the new "global tax" process, supported by her globalist rival, Sunak, as well as the WEF robots, Biden, Trudeau and Arden....They want a global business tax and are starting with corporations, or so they seek to con us.....Globalism must be resisted by sovereign nations....😎
"Liz Truss To Abolish WEF’s Global Tax 👏 👏 👏"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nzz_PkXiKmo
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
of 41 Next