This article is created with the intent to point to what I consider to be the possibility that Astrophysics and Color Theory are really one and the same Science.

Why is it possible to consider that to be a worthwile scenario to ponder about philosophically , spiritually and aesthetically? Well , because Johannes Van Itten and Georges Saureat remain two among the chief important standing pillars of Color Theory and their ideas remind me significantly of the ideas and theories of modern astrophysicists - that suns produce light , and that suns , or stars , are the origin of color.

I myself consider all suns to be wormholes , and black holes as such to be wormholes , and thus do I not consider black holes to be black per ce.

What has this got to do with modern spirituality , and with modern philosophy and even with ancient spirituality and ancient philosophy?

Well , astrophysics and color theory appear to me to work exactly the same - they resolve their problems in the same ways , particularly the problem of whether or not the moment when light breaks up to produce color , produces an infinite supply of color , or whether colors such as Cyan Blue and Primary Red are really Primary Colors at all.

Most people agree with the commonly held belief that there are Primary Colors , and I agree with this , based on my current and previous observations of various colors and the art projects I have produced , deriving from those studies.

What is art? I consider art as being somewhat of a translation.

Art is any attempt to translate something which may or may even not appeal to the interests of the aesthetic.

I am not though attempting to be irritating or plain boring in asserting that I am absolutely convinced as of present that Astrophysics and Color Theory are essentially the same Science , and should be treated en par with each other ,  or on equal terms.

The more research you do into astrophysics - the more you realize after having read a few books on Color Theory and Art such as those of Johannes Van Itten and Ian Simpson , that astrophysics is tremendously similar to Color Theory in it´s approax to the presentation and attempts at resolution or solution of philosophical problems through the analysis of astrophysical data , especially in light of the fact that all astrophysical data are really data compilations of themes in Color Theory.

Modern astrophysicists find it really hard to try to separate speculation from scientific research , or to consider a particular problem of astrophysics as concerning astrophysics solely.

Take a palette and paint something on it and what you are doing is that you are analyzing the same environment as that of an astrophysicist , and you are also breaking up light on the canvas in the same way that the astrophysicist visualizing light being broken up into nearly infinite varieties.

I feel that it does no justice to continuously separate Astrophysics and Color Theory as people have done unconsciously in the past and therefore , I feel , conspired against the notion that it is in fact nearly totally impossible to emphasize one being a Science with the other not being a Science.

The closer you look at astrophysical problems the more they resemble those of Color Theory and the various Color Theory exercises that people train themselves to do when they start producing art projects and pen down the results of their research into the nature of Color Theory related themes.

But why is Color Theory so similar to Astrophysics in it´s approax to the study of the implications of the overall philosophical problem of the origins of Color , and the essence of Light?

Because , as I have already outlined , the problems are the same - and because the results that will be obtained from trying to understand those problems for a Color Theorist become the same as those of an astrophysicist trying to decode the light that is broken up into infitismals in the formation of stellar structure.

Could it therefore ring true that a problem in Stellar Theory is somehow akin to a problem in Color Theory?

In my opinion certainly so!

For just like it is impossible for color to exist without the interference of a star , so it is impossible for an artist to be able to make a good painting without having a basic understanding of the nature and origins of color - that color is produced by starlight and is therefore as important to the artist - be they a painter or a sculptor or a movie maker , as an astrophysicist.