Faked Government by freud election has no authority to lead people, they are just puppets of secret society nehind the scnes.
Rude hooter of Abe and members of LDP continues to confuse the normal discussion of the House of Representatives of Japan.
■ Security-related bills: hooter retaliated as chairman is candid advic（Ｍａｉｎｉｃｈｉ５/27）
Moscow State International Relations University of military political problem Center's Alexei Podoberyosukin told as follows.
- By security legislation related bills in Japan has been adopted, there is danger of the growing incidence of military conflict in the region.
"It's inevitable. That's what he is the United States of goal. The United States wants to increase the political and military instability in the region. The reason is simple .20 century, the United States has proposed, the original of the United States of management in formed, military and political system, the financial and economic system, now the new power is emerging, in order to maintain managed to have. system retreated to Kokei, the United States is also desperately non, rival of feet are must Yuraga. must be forged a problem for Russia. Then, it is Ukraine. It is also some sort of problem is created for the Chinese market it is inevitable "
TEPCO that the risk of hydrogen explosion is growing at the Fukushima nuclear power plant has been revealed.
■ hydrogen explosion risk at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (National Iranian broadcasting 5/28)
Galactic Federation have reportedly continued to avoid the war effort by contact with each of the Putin-Obama-Shu collection. The World is progressing ready for official announcement behind scnes.
☆ F ★
····················
Comments
Respecting the Japanese Constitution
What the Abe government plans goes beyond a constitutional amendment.
The Japanese Constitution turned 68 this month. A constitution is a set of rules decided upon by the people of a nation in order to protect that nation and the livelihoods of its citizens, and is the foundation on which all other laws and systems are based. It is obvious, then, that a constitution needs to possess a degree of both stability and rigidity. Article 96 of the Japanese Constitution stipulates that any constitutional amendment needs to be passed by a majority of two thirds or more of both Houses of the Diet. It is likely that this requirement was put in place to make it more difficult to amend the Constitution in ways that run counter to its basic philosophy.
Likewise, the four great principles – sovereignty of the people, respect for basic human rights, pacifism, and international cooperation – set forth in the preamble of the Japanese Constitution are universal human values that should still be respected today. Indeed, these values are consistent with those expressed in the United Nations Charter, and we should continue to adhere to them.
Of course, it is ridiculous to say that the Constitution should never be amended under any circumstances, and as such there is little meaning in the old standoff between those who want to preserve the Constitution and those who want to amend it. If we have reached a point where changing times and global affairs mean that the provisions of the Constitution no longer fulfill their function of protecting the nation and its people, then naturally it is acceptable for the people themselves to decide to change it.
However, if we look at the ruling Liberal Democratic Party’s (LDP) proposed constitutional amendment, it is drafted from the perspective that the nation takes priority over its individual citizens. It demonstrates the kind of thinking that ignores or even rejects the basic philosophy of the Japanese Constitution. This should not be accepted under any circumstances. The draft proposal goes beyond the boundaries of a constitutional amendment, and should rather be described as an attempt to create a new Constitution. This “amendment” the LDP is attempting to adopt fundamentally repudiates the philosophy of the Japanese Constitution. Consequently, it has no continuity with the present Constitution, and in fact it could be said to be more reactionary in content than the old Meiji Constitution.
If the Abe Cabinet were to broach the subject of constitutional reform directly, it would face strong opposition and it would be very difficult for it to proceed. Instead, it has used sleight of hand and weasel words in a drip-drip-drip approach to bring about what is a revision to the Constitution in all but name. Last summer’s Cabinet decision permitting the use of the right to collective self-defense is a prime example of this. Now, the ruling parties are now trying to establish a legal framework that goes further than this. This method ignores the Constitution, and should never be permitted by a democratic nation that respects the rule of law.
If Prime Minister Shinzo Abe truly believes it is necessary to use the right to collective self-defense for the sake of Japan, he should put a proposal to amend Article 9 of the Constitution directly to the Japanese people. The government should not just take palliative measures, but make sure it engages in honest political governance.
Ichiro Ozawa is a Japanese politician and president of the People’s Life Party & Taro Yamamoto and Friends.