A video showing strange lights hovering over a pool in Naples Florida for nearly 30 minutes. Residents say they have never seen anything like it and experts aren't sure either. The video shows a disc-like object hovering over the pool before expanding and dipping into the waters, pulsing for half an hour

Monday night, security officer Debralee Thomas was watching the camera feed from behind a Gulf Shore Boulevard Condo building  just across the street from The Village on Venetian Bay, 4200 Gulf Shore Blvd N, Naples, FL when she noticed strange lights swoop in over the pool.

"I realized that it was something that wasn't normal, so I was like 'oh my, what is that,'" Thoma said.

At first glance, what she saw almost looked like a saucer-shaped object up top. Then the object went down into the pool and expanded like a web -- moving back and forth.

After nearly thirty minutes, the object started to disappear.

Thomas said bugs fly up to their cameras all the time, but this was further away.

"It was down on the ground but some of that webbing was longer and it made a funnel down into the pool. Whatever it was doing in the pool, I don't know," Thomas said.

The video was sent to MUFON, a UFO organization in Ohio. Officials at MUFON say it is one of the most fascinating videos they have seen in a while.

They are analyzing it, but they don't think it is a hoax. That's what Thomas' coworkers thought at first, until they saw the video their selves.

"We watched it on tape and to be honest I was so grateful that it was there so I could say it was real…it really happened," Thomas said.

 

Its not the first time UFO was sighted in Naples on September 14, 2010 dozens of People including Naples Fire Chief saw the UFO

Naples, Florida Police Officer Watched Large, Oval Light Through Telescope

Fourteen-year-old GMO protester and activist annihilates bullying TV host Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/041670_GMO_protestor_TV_host_Rachel_Parent.html#ixzz2cnAXgFuO

Fourteen-year-old GMO protester and activist annihilates bullying TV host

Learn more: 

Millionaire power broker and cable news personality Kevin O'Leary, a Canadian clone of Piers Morgan, recently had his head handed to him on a platter by a 14-year-old young woman who schooled him on the issue of unlabeled genetically modified organisms (GMOs). After making a series of arrogant and vulgar comments on the air about how GMO protesters are "stupid" and should "stop eating" in order to "get rid of them," O'Leary was publicly challenged to a debate by Rachel Parent, founder of the group, Kids Right to Know, who later exposed O'Leary on his own show as the biotechnology industry shill and bully that he truly is.

Back in May, when hundreds of thousands of protesters were gathering around the world in support of the March Against Monsanto movement, O'Leary sneered during a segment on The Lang And O'Leary Exchange about how people opposed to GMOs should all just stop eating and die. Repeatedly expressing his personal belief that he is always right about everything, O'Leary held back nothing in praising Monsanto as humanity's "hero," while at the same time decrying those who are concerned about the long-term safety of untested GMOs as "ignorant" and "stupid."

You can watch this disturbing segment with O'Leary, which aired on Canada's CBC News on May 27, 2013, here: http://www.cbc.ca

Not long after this aired, young Rachel, who has been educating the public and her peers about the dangers of GMOs since she was 12 years old, challenged O'Leary to a debate, which he accepted. But rather than tear her down and paint her as an immature child simply lashing out against something she does not fully understand, O'Leary became the butt of his own cruel joke, exposing himself as a corporate shill who will stop at nothing to defend the biotechnology industry, even if it means rehashing lies and throwing out ad hominem attacks against those with whom he disagrees.

"I want to respond to Mr. Kevin O'Leary's idiotic statement about 'stupid' people who protest against Monsanto," declared Rachel during a recent speech she gave prior to the debate. "I challenge you, Mr. O'Leary, to have me on your show next week, and if you promise not to use the word 'stupid,' then I won't use the word fascist," she added, to resounding applause and cheers.

Rachel Parent, the poster child for the future of the anti-GMO movement

Rachel's challenge was accepted, which allowed her the unique opportunity to educate viewers of The Lang and O'Leary Exchange about the fact that GMOs have never been long-term safety tested, for instance, and that genetic modification is not the same thing as hybridization. Without even having to say it herself, Rachel's calm and concise responses to O'Leary's badgering tactics even achieved an admission from O'Leary himself that the public is being used as a collective guinea pig in a massive GMO experiment with unknown consequences.

"We need a long-term study to determine if it's safe for not only our ecosystem but also for our health as well," said Rachel to O'Leary and his co-host when asked about what is needed to appropriately determine whether or not GMOs should be approved and used in the food supply. And O'Leary's response says it all.

"But Rachel, we're in a long-term study -- you're eating genetically-modified food whether you like it or not," stated O'Leary, backed up by co-host Amanda Lang who immediately added, "We are the lab rats," to which Rachel responded, "Exactly!"

You really need to watch the full interview for yourself to see O'Leary get buried and ultimately self-deflate his own pathetic arguments: http://youtube.com

You can also learn more about Rachel Parent's organization, Kids Right to Know, by visiting:
http://www.gmo-news.com
Study: 'Safety assessments' on nearly all common food additives found to be manipulated by processed food industry

Posted by The Watcher on August 21, 2013 in categories Health, Research

New research published in the journal, JAMA Internal Medicine, has verified that the vast majority of the 10,000-or-so chemical additives currently allowed in food are backed only by industry-funded and supported safety assessments. And a large percentage of these have never even been submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for review, which means the general population is essentially being used as a collective guinea pig in a giant food additive safety experiment.

Between 1997 and 2012, the FDA reportedly received 451 voluntary notifications about new food additives, 100 percent of which came from individuals and groups connected in one way or another to the food industry. Rather than be accompanied by independent safety research, every single one of these new additives came with "safety data" conjured by the companies that produce them, a serious conflict of interest that apparently has become the standard rather than the exception.

Researchers from The Pew Charitable Trusts (PCT), a non-profit organization serving the public interest, decided to review data on the new food additive notification process after the Government Accountability Office (GAO), a federal watchdog agency, issued a report back in 2010 raising concerns about it. And what they found is astounding, particularly as it pertains to public health and safety.

Building upon a previous study they conducted of a similar nature, Thomas Neltner and his colleagues determined that roughly 43 percent of the 10,000 additives currently allowed in food are on the FDA's GRAS list, which means they are "generally recognized as safe." The other 57 percent, according to the data, were approved through other means, or never submitted or approved at all. And practically all of them lack independent analysis to verify their safety.

"Rules governing the chemicals that go into a tennis racket are more stringent than (rules for) the chemicals that go into our food," said Neltner regarding the findings. "At least when you put a new chemical on the market, you have to notify the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). But there's no requirement that you notify the FDA when you make a new food additive."

Food additive companies not even required to submit GRAS requests to FDA

In order for a new food additive to be included on the GRAS list, its manufacturer is supposed to furnish the FDA with sound scientific evidence that it is actually safe, a process that obviously has its own inherent limitations and biases. But the fact of the matter is that food additive companies are not required to do this -- it is a completely voluntary process that allows the processed food industry to call the shots when it comes to food additive safety.

"In 1958, Congress gave additive manufacturers the right to decide on their own what food additives were GRAS without FDA being involved," writes Elizabeth Weise for USA Today about the scam. "Companies are not required to tell the agency when they've decided an additive is safe. If they choose to do so voluntarily, the company submits a letter to FDA outlining the scientific literature that supports its decision."

So naturally, food additive manufacturers have largely chosen to avoid the process altogether, as it really does not matter whether or not they notify the FDA about the use of new food additives. As a result, an overwhelming 99 percent of all food additives currently in use are either untested, were never submitted to the FDA at all or were submitted by industry insiders along with industry-funded safety data. In other words, the fox is guarding the hen house when it comes to food additive safety, as there is little-to-no credible oversight governing what millions of trusting Americans feed their families.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.reuters.com
http://www.usatoday.com
http://www.pewtrusts.org
http://science.naturalnews.com

Home» Area 51 » Pyramid » Google Earth Reveal Giant Pyramid Near Area 51 Base

In past we reported "Pyramids Globally Beaming Energy To Mysterious Space Cloud". Now in another interesting development Google Earth reveal giant Pyramid near Area 51 base.

Why have they built a gigantic pyramid like structure there in Area 51? Is Area 51 trying to harness mysterious ancient technology?

Is this MORE PROOF of ‘alien technology’ here in America? Something strange is certainly going on and for some reason, our own government doesn’t want us to know about it.

Left Side - Giant Pyramid

Google Earth Coordinates : 37° 5'45.66"N 116° 5'35.77"W

Update Image:

Area 51 Is Finally Recognised By The CIA

Recently we reported, "Google Earth Reveal Giant Pyramid Near Area 51 Base" 

THE truth is finally out there – a “UFO centre” that never officially existed for decades has now been acknowledged by the US government.

Area 51 - Nevada Test and Training Range and Groom Lake

The facts have been revealed after a Freedom of Information request from George Washington University – and there’s no mention of UFOs. A simple line-drawn plan finally confirms the location on Groom Lake salt flat.

But that won’t stop conspiracy theorists insisting it houses bodies of weird grey extraterrestrials, believed by some UFO geeks to have crashed their spaceship at Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947.

The theory goes that the aliens and their wrecked craft were taken to Area 51 for examination and that scientists even managed to set up future meetings in the desert with other alien life-forms.

Other developments said to have occurred in Area 51 include: weather control, secret weapons, time travel and teleportation.

Instead papers reveal the base was built by the Atomic Energy Commission in 1955 before being converted to train U-2 spy plane pilots in the Cold War.

Records reveal how scouts flying over the Nevada desert spotted the site in 1955 and agreed it was perfect for a new top secret military base.

President Eisenhower then approved the AEC’s purchase of the wasteland.

The US Air Force took over the base when the CIA finished with it in 1957 and continued using it to train pilots.

The planes were used for high altitude, all-weather intelligence gathering and flew over the Soviet Union, China, North Vietnam and Cuba in the 50s, 60s and 70s.

Official maps usually only show a disused mine at the site or a large area of restricted airspace.

George Washington University published the location in a report on the secret history of the U-2.

Jeffrey Richelson, of the National Security Archive said: “It marks an end of official secrecy about Area 51 and opens up possibilities of future projects being more fully explained.”