Fine Tunned Universe And Its Creator

There is yet another huge paradigm shift burrowing its way to physics. This round, it is the universe wherein everything happen by chance that is waving bye bye. Physicists are steadily beginning to realise that the universe is incredibly fine tunned as it were, the works of a genius accrobat.A philosopher termed Gotfried Leibniz once offered a good argument for God. In summary, it goes (putting it in my own words):1.)Everything whose otherwise than how it is is possible must have a reason why it is how it is and not that otherwise.2.)A universe that is not like this is possible.3.)Therefore there must be a reason why the universe is as it is and not any otherwise.4.)The ultimate cause of everything must have a sufficient reason within itself for being how it is and not any otherwise.In the era of Einstein's physics, there was a tendency of physicists to view the so called laws of physics as inevitable. Einstein himself was the gang leader in making it firm the notion of a law of physics. He is reported to have said that he want to see if God had any other option. Remember that Einstein tended to try explain phenomenon as though necesity. This is why even though space is perceived as necesity, he tended to unwittingly treat is as contingent, like aether. Using 'space' to explain physics will then make the physics looks more necesary than background dependent physics. However, this cannot realy fool anyone. That is why the search for a true theory of gravity is still ongoing and string theory IS background dependent, hence very contingent, suggesting that the universe is far from being inevitable.The physics that is doomed to get obselet is the one that explain natural phenomena using a pendulum that swings back and forth from necesity to chances and nothing in between.Q: Why did you get the head and not the tail after tossing the coin?A:The chanceQ:And why did the coin fall down and not up?A:The lawBy just invorking these two abrakadabras, chance and law, the physicist purpotes to explain everything and to understand nothing. Since everything that is not law must be a chance, then those things that happen with no law dictating them must be those likely. If they see 'unlikely' event but which nevertheless happen, then they look for a law to 'explain' it. However, unfortunately for them, not everything is explicable by laws. 'Laws' are just differential equations and solving them absolutely requires innitial and boundery condition. It is these conditions where the true drama lies. They are supposed to belong to the 'chance' folder but they stubbornly refuse to get their heads to the folder.So you are now ready to understand the fine tunning issue. Not every phenomena of physics is due to a law, much less, a necesity of nature. Specifically, the values of constants of nature are not determined by any laws. The mass of an electron is just like the mass of the earth or the moon. That is to say it could possibly be any value. But guess what? The value is choosen just to allow life to be possible! The wonder of the electron having the exact mass it has is just the same wonder of the earth having just the right size, with the just the right moon, with the right atmosphere, at at just the right distance from the sun just at the right time during sun's evolution to allow you to leave. There is no law which dictated where the earth should be. This is a matter of initial and boundery conditions presumed to be due to chances!THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSEThe universe is assumed to have begun. But since beginning together with its innitial conditions is supposed to belong to the 'chances basket', then maybe the picture of an exploding quarrey is appealing . After all with such a 'quarrey', you won't bother to ask why anything might be flying the way it might be flying. If on the other hand a pineable had poped out, it would be like a wow! This is because a pineable is thought to be 'unlikely' (by fallible human brain). However, Roger Penrose has shown that this is ridiculus! If the accuracy of the innitial conditions missed by one part in some number n, they you won't be here. To write n, use atoms for zeros. Then if an atom represents a zero, there isn't enough number of atoms in the known universe to write n! So the picture that comes to our mind for n seems not much different from infinity.To have exploded, the universe neaded to have a repulsive type gravity. It is thought to be offered by negative energy in vacuume otherwise termed cosmological constant. If this constant was slightly bigger, then objects would fly like bullets from a machine gun. Never would they have time to collect into atoms, let alone planets and stars. If this constant was slightly smaller, then the universe would have almost instantly recolaps into a blackhole. So to create a working universe, no skills short of that of an acrobatical basket baller that can throw a mango from japan all the way to a market in London surfice! To put it in summary, for a universe that can later bring out a pineable to begine, it requires as much a miracle to happen at the beginning as it were for the pineable itself to have poped out right at the start! Then Darwinism becomes moot!HIERARCHY PROBLEMTo what can I liken this with? It is like discovering that Venus and Earth are infact equal to an accuracy that is correct to 18 decimal places! When you want to say that there is a law that balances the masses, you realise that one is infact slightly heavier by just one atom, and this atom is crucial to life!There is a way in which physicists deal with infinities arising in their equations. They find themselves subtracting huge numbers from their equations. If there were a law of nature dictating the value of those numbers, as in the size of the earth, then you would espect them to cancel out. But the reason they should cancel out but just leave the precise and extreemly tiny number just neaded to make the cosmos is the center of the can of worms.ANTROPIC PRINCIPLE AND THE MULTIVERSEThe antropic principle is a joker card. It is a red herring. It says, hey, lets turn attention from the wonderfull universe and focus on an inexistent one which is not that wonderfull! So he opt to a 'theory of anything' to reintroduce 'chance' out of an inexistent window. But since multiverse theory is infact a theory of anything, one of this anything should be the same same God! What problem after all did this guys have with God? They have equally ended up with a theory that is both unverifyable and unfalsifyable. So why not just accept the simpler one: the universe was infact designed?So disperate is our poor 'Darwin' when he realise that explaining the origin of life using the universe merely kick the ball close to his own penalty area that he resort to bring Darwinism to cosmology! The universe is now thought to be akin to a leaving thing. It eats using a black hole, shits using a white hole and gives birth to baby universes using wormholes! Voila! Universes too can evolve via natural selection!Finally, lets recarp the antropic principle to see if it conduct electricity. It says the universe is as it is because if it were not so, we will not be there to study it. Good! If you one day find yourself trapped inside a well but then a rope come down to you so you may climb out, you can ammuse yourself that the rope came down to the well because if it were not so, you won't be there to think about ropes. I.e explain what it did not happen in an inexistent scenario because trying to explain what it did happen is too remarkable.PASTOR: Praise chances!GANG OF IDIOTS: Amen!
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Copyright Policy: Always Include 30-50% of the source material and a link to the original article. You may not post, modify, distribute, or reproduce in any way any copyrighted material, trademarks, or other proprietary information belonging to others without obtaining the prior written consent of the owner of such proprietary rights. If you believe that someone's work has been copied and posted on Ashtar Command in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please Contact Us and include the links to these pages and relevant info. 

Latest Activity

RichRaelian liked rev.joshua skirvin's blog post The Portals to the Fifth Dimension are Open; I am Kejraj.
18 minutes ago
Agarther Z left a comment on Comment Wall
"Good morning Drekx, they do it as long as they have a physical form, so till 8D? And do they live monogamous or how long does a relationship last because they live millenias long, how is it with that?"
1 hour ago
Love & Joy posted a discussion
   Is This A Theme Unfolding For You As Well ?By Melanie Beckler Hey there! I've noticed a theme that is unfolding for me right now, and I sense it may be resonant for you as well. Here's what it is: How you respond to change and challenge now…
2 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
4 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
4 hours ago
AlternateEarth replied to AlternateEarth's discussion Can you see the images in this?
"The more time passes the more the shapes take form-creepy as heck, this one-let your eyes adjust"
4 hours ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
Greetings friends! From heart to heart in this moment we speak, I am Kejraj.The portals to the Fifth Dimension are open. You simply are asked to align your energies to that of your Higher Self, and this is achieved with focused breathing and…
9 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"A few years ago, there was a former member called "Richard Stoddard," who told me that he could not believe that ETs, such as the galactic human types, could have physical sex....As they were, in his perceptions, "above it, or beyond it,…"
12 hours ago
More…