URGENT FLU SALVATION REPORTFROM DR. LEONARD HOROWITZDear Healthy World Member,This is an URGENT MESSAGE to be circulated as far and fast as possible:heart528Click on this link to:FINAL FLU SALVATION MESSAGEWe are now only 3.5 weeks away from LIVE H2O, and last week I learned how the Living Water shall be involved in our physical salvation and spiritual protection from the advancing global genocide. The current H1N1 pandemic was seeded to become the Swine/Avian/Spanish flu "Big One" by this fall, according to the accumulated intelligence I have received, and am hereby passing on to you as a humble servant and "Watchman."Ironically, and by Divine direction, we shall perform the Concert for the Living Water for protection and evolution, praying, chanting, and drumming together for lasting peace on earth, world health, and universal prosperity, June 19-21, 2009, with great assured success!I am on my way to London this afternoon and will not return to the U.S. for more than a week. I had hoped to produce, before leaving, another SPECIAL REPORT on YouTube for broadcasting this new information, but I simply ran out of time. Not wanting to delay getting you this URGENT information, I pray the link and new web article will, with your help, get this critical message out to our extended family worldwide. It may be that your participation in prayer in honor of The Living Water, on June 21, 2009, at 5PM PST (8PM EST), may be the most important prayer you will ever pray in your life. It may be this prayer is required to seal you (spiritually) in the "Book of Life" during the forthcoming 42 months of GREAT TRIBULATION. For this, we now come together to sing and chant in honor of The Living Water in and around us, in LOVE (528Hz).(In case you missed my previous mailings, by everything I am witnessing in the world of science and medicine, religion and theology; in terms of revelation, we shall be fulfilling much of Rev. 13 and 14, ousting the "beast from the sea," beginning June 21, 2009, for 42 months (Rev. 13:5) until Dec. 21, 2012. Then, according to many brilliant scholars who have advanced this thesis, we will receive huge solar flares and cosmic radiations mediated and remedied by The Living Water.)So please read, and re read, this new article I have posted on HealthyWorldSolutions.com at your earliest availability. I sincerely, with all my heart, request that you do this--attend to this information--to make your provisions for salvation.Finally, again I am sending you this link to a FREE LIVEH2O.tv PLAYER with an instant EMBED CODE for ANYONE YOU KNOW WHO HAS A WEBSITE to become a broadcaster of LIVE H2O--Concert for the Living! Our goal is to have 1440 players installed on websites worldwide by June 18, 2009. That is only 3.5 weeks from now, SO DO NOT DELAY sending this urgent notice to your extended family and loved ones worldwide.Thanks for your service to our glorious Creator.Arya ben Schlomo ha Levi(a.k.a. Dr. Len Horowitz)Executive Producer,LIVE H2O--Concert for the Living Water!
Read more…
Vaccine Studies: Under the Influence of Pharmavaccine, NVIC, medical journals, science, studiesBy Barbara Loe FisherIf you take more than a casual look at the way the mass vaccination system in the U.S. works, you see that pharmaceutical companies marketing vaccines have a lot of clout.It was the pharmaceutical industry that told Congress in 1982 that they were going to leave the nation without vaccines if they didn't get liability protection but have opposed making it less difficult for vaccine victims to obtain federal compensation in the U.S. Court of Claims under a 1986 law that gave them liability protection.It is Pharma lobbyists, who bully the FDA into fast tracking vaccines like Gardasil and who sit at the CDC's policymaking tables urging that new vaccines be recommended for use by all children so they can persuade state legislators to mandate vaccines like influenza vaccine.How Big Pharma Influences Medical JournalsA recent study published in the British Medical Journal reveals the clout that Big Pharma has in the world of medicine journal publishing, specifically the publishing of scientific articles about vaccines. In a Cochrane Collaboration review and analysis of published influenza vaccine studies found that influenza vaccine studies sponsored by industry are treated more favorably by medical journals even when the studies are of poor quality.This analysis confirms that drug companies marketing vaccines have a major influence on what gets published and is said about vaccines in medical journals. It is no wonder that there are almost no studies published in the medical literature that call into question vaccine safety.The preferential treatment of Pharma-funded studies also explains why the risks of an inappropriately fast-tracked vaccine like Gardasil are underplayed in the medical literature and why a physician like Andrew Wakefield, M.D. who dared to publish a study in 1998 in a medical journal (The Lancet) calling for more scientific investigation into the possible link between MMR vaccine and regressive autism, has been mercilessly persecuted for more than a decade, by both Pharma-funded special interest groups, as well as public health officials maintaining close relationships with vaccine manufacturers.Study Finds No Correlation Between Quality of Study and PublicationThis recent review identified and assessed 274 published studies on influenza vaccines for their methodological quality and found no relationship between study quality, publication in prestige journals or their subsequent citation in other articles.The researchers also found that most influenza vaccine studies are of poor quality but those with conclusions favorable to influenza vaccinations are of significantly lower methodological quality. The single most important factor determining where the studies were published or how much they were cited was sponsorship, with those partially or wholly funded by the pharmaceutical industry having higher visibility.The authors commented:"The study shows that one of the levers for accessing prestige journals is the financial size of your sponsor. Pharma sponsors order many reprints of studies supporting their products, often with in house translations into many languages. They also purchase advertising space in the journal. Many publishers openly advertise these services on their website. It is time journals made a full disclosure of their sources of funding”.The HPV Vaccine -- Just One Example of Inappropriate Influence Endangering Public HealthLast month the National Vaccine Information Center (www.NVIC.org) called on the Obama Administration and Congress to investigate Gardasil vaccine risks. NVIC has long questioned the inappropriate influence of vaccine manufacturers in federal vaccine licensing and policymaking and state vaccine mandates.In 2006, Merck's Gardasil vaccine was fast tracked by the FDA at Merck's request and in 2007 Merck lobbyists mounted an aggressive lobbying campaign to get Gardasil mandated by state legislators for all sixth grade girls, which would have assured the big drug company a predictable market.The Pharma lobbying effort in 2007 to get all states to mandate Gardasil failed but every other vaccine produced by drug companies and licensed by the FDA in the past quarter century has been mandated. Those new mandates were added to state vaccine laws by legislators and public health officials at the urging of vaccine manufacturer lobbyists and Pharma funded organizations touting vaccine studies published in the medical literature.Massive Increase in Number of Vaccines GivenIn the past three decades, the numbers of doses of government recommended vaccines for children and medical organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics has tripled to 69 doses of 16 vaccines, with 48 doses of 14 vaccines targeted to children under age six.Pharma lobbyists have persuaded most states to pass laws requiring two to three dozen doses of most of the 16 government recommended vaccines. Last year New Jersey became the first state to mandate influenza vaccine for children attending daycare and school.In the past few years, Dr. Jefferson has authored several independent reviews of influenza studies published in the medical literature for the Cochrane Collaboration, which have been published in the British Medical Journal, questioning the quality of published scientific evidence for influenza vaccine effectiveness and safety for the elderly as well as children.Clearly, if the makers and marketers of vaccines can influence the quality and quantity of the scientific evidence published in the medical literature proving that vaccines are safe and effective -- evidence that is used by states to mandate vaccines and by the U.S. Court of Claims to deny compensation to vaccine injured children -- then Congress was wrong in 1986 to protect the makers and marketers of vaccines from liability for injuries and deaths caused by those vaccines.Government Vaccine Recommendations Based on Tainted EvidenceThe U.S. Court of Claims vaccine injury compensation awards, and state vaccine mandates are justified on the strength of scientific published in medical journals.It is time for medical journals to disclose all financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. It is time for studies questioning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines to receive a fair hearing in scientific journals rather than editors confining themselves to primarily publishing studies funded by the pharmaceutical industry maintaining that every vaccine is totally safe, effective and necessary.Kudos to the British Medical Journal for having the integrity to publish Dr. Jefferson's comprehensive analysis of pharmaceutical money influence on vaccine studies published in the medical literature. Hopefully, this will be a wake-up call for the scientific community, Congress and the public to put an end to the undue influence the pharmaceutical industry has on the science and policy of mass vaccination in the U.S.Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has hit it on the head with this article. There are many disturbing issues at work behind and beneath the vaccine research that actually ends up seeing the light of day.For example, the peer review process, which is the basic method for checking medical research to see if it’s fit to publish, is not without serious flaws.For one, it’s almost impossible to find out what happens in the vetting process as peer reviewers are unpaid, anonymous and unaccountable. And although the system is based on the best of intentions, it lacks consistent standards and the expertise of the reviewers can vary widely from journal to journal.This leaves the field wide open to reviewers to base their decisions on their own prejudices. And more often than not, there is a distinct tendency to let flawed papers through if their conclusion is favorable for the vaccine.As Dr. John Ioannidis (see below) has previously stated, there appears to be an underlying assumption that scientific information is a commodity, and hence, scientific journals are a medium for its dissemination and exchange.When scientific journals function in this manner, it has major consequences for the entire field of science and medicine, and ultimately for you and your family’s health – especially in the case of vaccines, as many wind up being mandated for all children.While idealists will likely not agree with this viewpoint, realists can acknowledge that journals generate revenue and build careers. Publication is also critical for both drug development and marketing, which are needed to attract venture capital.So, sad to say, it is ever so clear that the current system is highly susceptible to manipulation of both pocketbooks and ego’s.Scientific Claims -- A 50/50 Chance of Being TrueBack in 2005, Dr. John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist at Ioannina School of Medicine, Greece, showed that there is less than a 50 percent chance that the results of any randomly chosen scientific paper will be true.Dr. Ioannidis did it again just last year, showing that much of scientific research being published is highly questionable. According to that analysis, the studies most likely to be published are those that oversell dramatic or otherwise considered important results.Results that oftentimes turn out to be false later on.Prestigious journals boast that they are very selective, turning down the vast majority of papers that are submitted to them. The assumption is that they therefore publish only the best scientific work.But Dr. Ioannidis study of 49 papers in leading journals, which had been cited by more than 1,000 other scientists -- in other words, well-regarded research -- showed that within only a few years, almost a third of the papers had been refuted by other studies.Making matters worse, the “hotter” the field, the greater the competition, and the more likely that published research in top journals could be wrong.Who’s Paying for the Science?One of the simple ways to evaluate how likely any manipulation has occurred is to track down who financed the study. The reason you want to do this is likely very obvious as it’s well known that studies funded by industry or conducted by researchers with industry ties tend to favor corporate interests.This makes perfect logical sense if you consider that no one in their right mind would pay for a study, and then make sure it gets disseminated it if it turned out the drug or vaccine in question was ineffective, or worse, downright dangerous.However sometimes this will be difficult to do as the funding is cleverly disguised through benign or even philanthropic-sounding front names.What Does This Mean to Your Health?First of all, you need to realize that medical journals have enormous influence on which drugs doctors prescribe, the treatment hospitals provide, and the vaccines that your child will be exposed to.As Fisher explains above, more and more vaccines are being mandated based on the studies presumably showing them to be “safe and effective.” This is a travesty, and an absolute disaster for our youth.Here are some other ways this flawed system of publishing industry-tainted science can, and does, influence medicine and your health:*Drug prescription deaths accounted for 95 percent of all unintentional and undetermined poisoning deaths in 2004*"Preventive” drugs and vaccines for everything from cancer to dental caries are on the rise, which, of course, are prescribed to perfectly healthy people*Pharmaceutical companies are also pushing for more and more non-logical uses of their drugs, such as administering the HPV vaccine to young boys, even though they do not have the prerequisite anatomy to contract the disease*Death attributed to psychotherapeutic drugs (anti-depressants and sedatives) nearly doubled, from 671 to 1,300 deaths between 1999 and 2004*State mandated drugging of children as young as three years old with psychiatric drugs is now on a steady rise*In January 2006, the FDA put in place the preemption protection scheme that bans private lawsuits against drug companies and physicians in state courts, once a drug has achieved the FDA’s stamp of approvalWhat Can You Learn From This?When evaluating health news, it is wise to be cautious even if it’s published in a scientific journal. You must come to the realization that YOU are responsible for your, and your family’s, health; not me, not your doctor, and certainly not drug companies that try to convince you that your child not only needs every single vaccine mandated -- and that every single one is safe -- in order to sell their wares.Remember, medicine is a business. And so are the journals publishing the science used as the basis for medicine and as such they are highly susceptible to major conflicts of interests because of the very large sums of money involved here.Related Links:Studies Funded by Drug Companies Favor Drugs 80 Percent of the TimePeer Review System for Journals Can Get You Into TroubleIs the Evidence Really Evidence?for more go to: www.mercola.com (sign fro free weekly news letter)Learn.....go to www.tetrahedron.org (Dr. Horowitz!)
Read more…
A Vaccine Form You Can Give to Your PediatricianWant assurances from your pediatrician about vaccines? Here’s a form designed by Ken Anderson you can give them to fill out -- although there is no physician anywhere on earth who will sign it.PLEASE NOTE: In addition to the form below, there is a web site VacLib.Org that has compiled information on Vaccine Exemption Forms and InformationHere are Links to Their Information[AK] [AL] [AR] [AZ] [Australia] [Canada] [CA] [CO] [CT] [DC] [DE] [FL] [GA] [GUAM] [HI] [IA] [ID] [IL] [IN] [KS] [KY] [LA] [Maine] [MD] [Mass] [MI] [MN] [MO] [MS] [MT] [NC] [ND] [NE] [NH] [NJ] [NM] [NV] [NY] [New Zealand] [OH] [OK] [OR] [PA] [PUERTO_RICO] [RI] [SC] [SD] [TN] [TX] [UT] [VA] [VT] [WA] [WI] [WV] [WY]Physician"s Warranty of Vaccine SafetyI (Physician"s name, degree)_________________________, _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State of ________________. My State license number is _______________ , and my DEA number is _______________. My medical specialty is ________________________I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient"s name) ___________________________ , age _________ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:Risk Factor ____________________________________________Vaccination ___________________________________________Risk Factor ____________________________________________Vaccination ___________________________________________Risk Factor ____________________________________________Vaccination ___________________________________________Risk Factor ____________________________________________Vaccination ___________________________________________Risk Factor ____________________________________________Vaccination ___________________________________________Risk Factor ____________________________________________Vaccination ___________________________________________I am aware that vaccines typically contain many of the following fillers:* aluminum hydroxide* aluminum phosphate* ammonium sulfate* amphotericin B* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,* dog kidney, monkey kidney,* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg* calf (bovine) serum* betapropiolactone* fetal bovine serum* formaldehyde* formalin* gelatin* glycerol* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)* hydrolized gelatin* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))* monosodium glutamate (MSG)* neomycin* neomycin sulfate* phenol red indicator* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)* potassium diphosphate* potassium monophosphate* polymyxin B* polysorbate 20* polysorbate 80* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein* residual MRC5 proteins* sorbitol* tri(n)butylphosphate,* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and* washed sheep red bloodand, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosol causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin"s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient"s name) _______________ _______________________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as "fetuses").In order to protect my patient"s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.STEPS TAKEN: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A , attached hereto, -- "Physician"s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety." (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician"s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, -- "Scientific Articles in Support of Physician"s Warranty of Vaccine Safety."The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, -- "Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician"s Opinion of Vaccine Safety."The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, -- "Physician"s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions."Hepatitis BI understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection.The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years._____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, "Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors."I am issuing this Physician"s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient"s name) ________________________________.Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case.I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .__________________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)__________________________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________Witness: _______________________________ Date: ______________________Notary Public: ___________________________ Date: ______________________Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:Although you likely won’t find any physician anywhere willing to sign this form, it could be a valuable learning lesson to simply bring it with you and present it to him or her, if nothing else just to observe the reaction.Because the truth is, your pediatrician is not taking responsibility for any adverse reactions or damage that happens to your child, and neither are the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture the vaccines that injure countless children each year.Vaccine companies have long ago used political manipulation through their strong lobbying efforts tocreated legislation that essentially immunizes them against any law suit damages or awards. The Homeland Security bill also contains a provision that protects manufacturers of vaccines that contain thimerosal from liability in vaccine-related lawsuits. Pro-vaccine-safety educators have long been saying that vaccines can over-stimulate your child’s immune system, sometimes causing the very disease it’s designed to protect against, or worse. And, when several vaccines are administered together, or in close succession, their interaction may completely overwhelm your child’s developing immune system.Once that happens, what can you do? Where can you turn?You’re far better off doing your own research beforehand so that you can make an educated decision about the health of your child, than to blindly trust your pediatrician, who likely has not done much research on it either, and is in turn trusting the information they get directly from the vaccine manufacturer.There’s Little Help to Be Had Once Tragedy StrikesPresident Reagan signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 into law on Nov. 14, 1986, which is the legislation I mentioned above. However, in the two decades since, it has become obvious that the vaccine injury compensation program is fatally flawed, and so broken it should be repealed – something Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is strongly advocating.The NVIC is also currently petitioning the Obama Administration and Congress to investigate the fast track licensure and universal use recommendation of Gardasil; the HPV vaccine that has already caused over 10,000 adverse event reports to be filed since its release in 2006.During the program’s 22-year history, two out of three individuals applying for federal vaccine injury compensation have been turned away empty-handed.As of October 2008, of a total of 12,746 claims that had been filed, 2,266 had been compensated to the tune of about $1.8 billion, while 4,755 had been dismissed.And although the claims were supposed to be handled "quickly, easily and with certainty and generosity," according to a House report accompanying the 1986 legislation, many claims have taken years -- more than 10 years -- to be settled.Even the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration state that it takes an average of two to three years to adjudicate a claim after it is filed.How Does the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Work?Prior to October 1, 1988, you could pursue an unrestricted lawsuit against a vaccine manufacturer if you, or your child were injured by a vaccine. After that date, including currently, you are required to apply for federal compensation prior to pursuing a lawsuit.According to the program’s guidelines:* The system will offer to pay up to $250,000 for a vaccine-associated death.* The system will offer to pay for all past and future unreimbursed medical expenses, custodial and nursing home care; up to $250,000 pain and suffering; and loss of earned income.These remedies surely fall far short of what is deserved and required if your child is injured, or killed, by a vaccine. You simply cannot put a price on a lost life, and a study by Harvard professor Michael Ganz found that the lifetime cost of caring for a child with autism is more than $3 million.And yet, according to statistics from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, not one case related to autism has been deemed “compensable.” Only last year did the government concede that vaccines “significantly aggravated” an underlying disorder and caused “autistic symptoms” in one 9-year-old girl named Hannah Poling.So who is actually responsible for paying whatever meager compensations that do get awarded?Contrary to what you would think, it is NOT the vaccine manufacturers.The system is funded by a surcharge on each dose of vaccine sold. The doctors pay the tax initially when they purchase the vaccines, but this is passed right down to the parents of the child.So not only are the vaccine manufacturers shielded from potential lawsuits, they are not even responsible for paying one cent of the claims filed against them -- you are!What Options do You Have?The government essentially forces children to get vaccines by threatening to not let them into the school system otherwise. Well, a growing network of parents have decided to homeschool their children, in part because of their belief that mandated vaccinations for public and private school children are a dangerous overreach by state governments.The trend toward not vaccinating has been growing for some time now. Close to 70 percent of physicians say that the number of concerns from parents have increased significantly in recent years.And rightfully so.If you read the form above, you saw a long list of potentially toxic chemicals – fillers and adjuvants -- that are included in various vaccines given to newborns and children.If your child is vaccinated according to the CDC's recommended schedule, by the time your child starts kindergarten he or she will have received 48 doses of 14 vaccines. Of these, 36 doses will be given during the first 18 months of life.Public health officials have NEVER proven that it is indeed safe to inject this number and volume of vaccines into infants. What's more, they cannot explain why, concurrent with an increasing number of vaccinations, there has been an explosion of neurological and immune system disorders in American children.As I’ve stated before, I’m not anti-vaccine, but rather pro-vaccine safety, and homeschooling your children is not the only option out there.In the Related Links below, I have included the link to Dr. Donald Miller’s recommendations for a more sensible vaccination schedule.If you have reviewed the evidence and still feel your child should be inoculated to a certain degree, this is a far safer alternative to the standard program. Your pediatrician will not like this schedule, but he or she will probably be more apt to go along with a modified schedule than signing the form above.I’d also recommend you print out this NVIC flyer detailing how to recognize a vaccine reaction, and review it after each and every vaccination.If you decide you do not want to vaccinate, know that all 50 states have vaccination requirements but all states provide exemptions for medical reasons while 48 states allow exemptions for sincerely held religious beliefs. Another 18 states allow parents to opt out for personal, conscientious or philosophical beliefs as well.My previous article, How To Legally Avoid Unwanted Immunizations Of All Kinds, spells out how you go about practicing this right, as does an entire chapter in my book Take Control of Your Health.Support Those Who Champion Vaccine SafetyMy team has recently created a brand new web site for the NVIC, which I urge you to visit for more information on all topics related to vaccines and vaccine safety.And, if you believe strongly in NVIC's effort to inform the public about these types of issues, you can support their cause by making a donation of $25 or more to NVIC and receive a gift of Barbara's 2008 book Vaccines, Autism & Chronic Inflammation: The New Epidemic. Please click HERE to make a donation.Related Links:Unbelievable Correspondence With CDC About Vaccine SafetyA User-Friendly Vaccination ScheduleFew Getting Help From Vaccine FundVISIT www.mercola.com and sign for free news letter!
Read more…
No Star Wars campaignDear friend,the Czech Parliament will have to take a stand about the construction of a U.S. military base and probably it will vote in favour of its installation, even though 70% of the population opposes this plan.Given the urgency of the situation, we have launched an on-line petition to exert pressure on the Parliament and ask that the matter be resolved with a referendum.The NMD project of the United States – their national missile defense system, is a very complex project which involves the production of new weapons, and the installation of American military bases in different parts of the planet. In particular, in Europe, the first step is the installation of a radar system in the Czech Republic, and a base for interceptor missiles in Poland. This plan has divided Europe, which at the moment is not able to give a united, coherent and nonviolent response to the United States’ aggressive policies. The reaction of Russia and China has created a “cold war” atmosphere. International tensions are increasing, and the crazy arms race (both conventional and nuclear) has restarted. Above all, the bases are being installed to militarize and control space.The majority of Czechs do not want foreign military bases on their territory.The majority of Czechs want to decide these problems themselves by means of a referendum: a fundamental instrument of any democracy.You are being asked to support our nonviolent protest!This plan does not involve only us Czechs, but the whole of Europe and the whole world.Sign our on-line petition, and pass it on to your friends!Send us your messages of support!Help us collect a million signatures!Jan TamášNon-violent Movement against US bases in Czech RepublicDana FeminováEurope for PeaceSign the petition "No Star Wars"go to: www.nenasili.cz (and click for english transl. / flag , if needed/
Read more…
I was surprised to see adds by Google on this website - type : Shingles vaccination and vaccine propaganda.It is observed for some time that unnecessary chickenpox vaccine causes shingles and there is a link for manufacturing shingles vaccine....There are many examples how disease is linked to vaccinations, for example polio - with cancer, hep B. with AIDS, chickenpox - with shingles, HPV Gardasil - death and paralyzes..... and many many others.......Please go to www.mercola.com (type to research box and learn more about vaccinationPlease go to www.tetrahedron.org (and learn from well known expert Horowitz)
Read more…
RepostedKatie Couric Reports on Serious Vaccine Safety IssuesThere are new concerns about Gardasil, the vaccine that prevents a virus that may cause cervical cancer.What makes this new information even more compelling is that Spain actually withdrew 75, 000 doses of the vaccine from their market just last week.The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has compared Gardasil adverse events to the meningitis vaccine; Gardasil injections resulted in three times the number of Emergency Room visits -- more than 5,000. Reports of side effects were up to 30 times higher with Gardasil.Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder of the NVIC, said,"Now we know from this report that there are more reactions and deaths associated with Gardasil than with another vaccine given in the same age group. It's irresponsible not to take action."We are also proud to announce a joint collaboration with NVIC, and after many months of intensive effort they have a new site up that will allow them to serve as the premier source of vaccine safety information.Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:Over 10,000 adverse reactions, including 27 deaths, have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in relation to Gardasil. Yet, the CDC and FDA are alleging that the vast majority, or even ALL, of these cases are unrelated to the vaccine. Therefore, they claim, Gardasil is safe.Says Barbara Loe Fisher, President and co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC):“The tragic story of Gardasil vaccine is one that is playing out real time in the homes of trusting parents, who thought they were doing the right thing to try to make their daughters "one less," and in the 21st century cyberspace forum of public opinion as well as on television.”The Gardasil vaccine is one of the most blatant deceptions going on in modern medicine. Well-meaning mothers are being deceived into thinking this shot will protect their daughters from cervical cancer, and some of them are now wondering HOW and WHY their young child died orbecame suddenly paralyzed.NVIC Petitions White House and Congress to Investigate Gardasil On February 9, the NVIC launched a petition and issued a national press release calling on President Barack Obama, his Administration and Congress, to investigate the fast track licensure and universal use recommendation of Gardasil in 2006, and the dismissal of more than 10,000 reports of Gardasil-related reactions, injuries and deaths to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System as a "coincidence" by federal health officials.NVIC's latest Gardasil risk report, which compares the number and severity of adverse events reported to VAERS through November 30, 2008, reveals that death and serious health problems such as stroke, blood clots, cardiac arrest, seizures, fainting, lupus and rechallenge cases are reported three to 30 times more frequently after Gardasil vaccination than after meningococcal (Menactra) vaccination.Barbara Loe Fisher explains the significance of this fact:“If the deaths and serious injuries reported after Gardasil were only a "coincidence," there would be little or no difference between the frequency and severity of vaccine-related adverse events between two vaccines, if the vaccines were equally reactive, and the number of doses were roughly the same.Gardasil and Menactra vaccines were licensed within a year of each other and recommended by the CDC for universal use in 11-12 year olds.Although Menactra is given to boys and girls and has already been mandated in many states for high school and college entry, Gardasil is only given to girls and is not yet mandated.Menatra is given as a one-dose series and, by February 25, 2008, the CDC reported that about 15.5 million doses of Menactra had been distributed in the U.S.. Gardasil is given in a three dose series and the CDC reported that, by July 2008, about 16 million doses had been distributed in the U.S.This means that about 15 million doses of Menactra were given to about 15 million boys and/or girls and about 16 million doses of Gardasil - if every girl got three doses - were given to about five million girls.It is individuals - not doses of vaccine - who collapse, convulse, become paralyzed, have heart attacks, develop lupus and other chronic health problems after being vaccinated. The fact that death and serious health problems are reported 3 to 30 times more frequently after Gardasil than after Menactra is highly significant and it is irresponsible for federal health officials and Merck to blow it off as unimportant.”What Does Merck Have to Say About it?It’s incomprehensible that the CDC, FDA, and Merck -- the makers of Gardasil – cannot see the facts presented in this VAERS analysis, and choose instead to cling to worn-out propaganda slogans and pre-written advertising messages that fly in the face of reason.In the hours before the CBS News report shown above was broadcast, Merck addressed the differences between adverse events associated with Gardasil and Menactra as follows:"It's important to remember that the proven benefit of GARDASIL is that it helps prevent cervical cancer caused by the two virus types responsible for most cases of cervical cancer.Nothing is more important to Merck than the safety of our products and we carefully monitor the safety of GARDASIL on a routine basis. Experts at the FDA and CDC also continue to review data and, as recently as four months ago, said "GARDASIL continues to be safe and effective, and its benefits continue to outweigh its risks."NVIC is not a medical organization and has a long history of raising concerns about vaccines that are in direct conflict with the opinion of leading medical experts. We encourage consumers to get reliable information about the safety of vaccines from www.cdc.gov."Spain Already Removed the VaccineSpain has, as recently as last week, withdrawn 75, 000 doses of the HPV vaccine from their market, after two teenagers who received the shots were hospitalized.Seems they weren’t as influenced by the drug company’s rhetoric as U.S. authorities, and are more concerned about the safety of their citizens.Get Involved and Help Save the Daughters of This NationSays Fisher:“In the past 27 years, the stories of death and brain damage that have been reported to the NVIC have never changed. Whether the vaccine victims are 15 months old or 15 years old, the stories are the same: a trusting parent took a bright, healthy child to a doctor for a routine vaccination and the child was never the same again.The Gardasil vaccine was inappropriately fast tracked and licensed by the FDA and recommended by the CDC with too little attention paid to the reports of brain and immune system dysfunction that developed after vaccination in pre-licensure clinical trials.That same cavalier attitude toward Gardasil-related deaths and serious health problems, which have been experienced by many girls and young women after licensure, is inexcusable.”Most Americans have blindly placed their trust in the vaccine makers and in federal health agencies, whose responsibility is to ensure that drugs and vaccines licensed for public use are safe, effective and necessary.However, over the years it has become very clear that those responsible for protecting your health are not looking out for your best interest and that of your children.And if they won’t do it, then it is up to you and me to do it.I urge you to sign the Investigate Gardasil Vaccine Risks Now! petition available on the http://www.NVIC.org web site that my team helped create for them.If you believe strongly in NVIC's effort to inform the public about these types of issues, you can support their cause by making a donation of $25 or more to NVIC and receive a gift of Barbara's 2008 book Vaccines, Autism & Chronic Inflammation: The New Epidemic. Click HERE to make a donation.You may also print out this NVIC flyer detailing how to recognize a vaccine reaction.Says Fisher:“In 2009, I have a sense of déjà vu as the story of Gardasil vaccine plays out real time. There are striking parallels between how those operating the mass vaccination system reacted in the 1980's to persistent reports that the DPT vaccine was harming more children than originally assumed, and the way they are reacting now to persistent reports that Gardasil is more reactive than it was originally assumed.Assumption of safety is no substitute for proof of safety.And turning away from human suffering in order to protect the status quo is not the way to run a government that needs the trust and support of the people.In the 18th century, Queen Marie Antoinette looked down at a starving people pleading for bread to stay alive and said "Let them eat cake." It is time for everyone in government, industry and medicine to take a different approach to persistent reports of vaccine injuries and deaths or risk metaphorically suffering the same fate that ended the monarchy in France.In the 21st century, today's peasants don't have pitchforks - they have laptops, desktops, smartphones and the internet.”I strongly urge you to join in petitioning our new U.S. administration and Congress to take a close, hard look at the HPV vaccine, to end the needless suffering of tens of thousands of young, bright, innocent girls.And, please, forward this important message to everyone you know by using the ‘Email this article to a friend’ button, located in the top left corner of this page.
Read more…
