Too funny... of course 'one' is drawn to this meaningless drama. Right in keeping with the bottom feeding that dictates his limited perspective. If the Lafont post helped you two to meet, perhaps it served a higher purpose after all. Thanks for the laughs boys.
Vitas, would deleting the Lafont post enable you to sleep better at night? You seem consumed by what is a fringe issue at best. My intent was NOT to stir the Galactic pot... I was simply carrying over a post from another site. If this would give you some relief, let me know. No doubt Meline would be quite amazed to know someone is putting in so much energy to champion her message. Keep up the good works Vitas! ~In Light
Vitas, I have nothing left to say on the Lafont issue... if there's something you feel I need to read simply post it on your wall & I'll check it out... otherwise, I look forward to reading the discussion you create to clear up the whole issue. ~In Light
Hey Vitas, why not take the time you're spending seeking an explanation from me to create a discussion that clears up the Lafont issue for yourself or anyone else interested. Bottom line: the confusion about her 'channeling' wasn't generated by me. & if Méline Lafont herself has a problem with the post (which again I did NOT write) she can easily correct the misunderstanding herself. ~ApotheosisNow555
Yeah Vitas, to be honest I don't remember exactly where I got the post... possibly 'Lightworkers.org'? If you're saying that the post is not from her... well, I'll take your word for it. I am curious to see how the data evolves, as she herself must know about the claim that the 'channeling' wasn't from her. If you can point me to the forum where she clarifies the situation I'd love to check it out. ~In Light
"OK that sounds good, BUT I am worried how will Trump perform since he was replaced by his clone... :-\ You can already see that he speaks very differently about some topics then how he spoke during his campaign. Just search for some videos. The…"
"man you never answer a direct question even if somebody spent time to compile it for you do you? Too bad...
You post nonsense which causes a lot of emotions not just here but on other blogs too (which I sent you), so I don't see what is laughable…"
"You assume? It is the very first line of your post, so what do you assume? What about the post subject? If you try to google for this you cannot find it, because Méline probably never said such thing and you are misleading us all. Too bad you don't…"
"Allright...this confuses me A LOT! Where is this information from? Why doesn't SHE write it on here blog and we read it here? Somebody try to explain me how the heck can somebody post on Méline's own blog impersonating her and she does not do…"
Comments
Too funny... of course 'one' is drawn to this meaningless drama. Right in keeping with the bottom feeding that dictates his limited perspective. If the Lafont post helped you two to meet, perhaps it served a higher purpose after all. Thanks for the laughs boys.
Vitas, the Lafont post is gone!... hopefully this brings you some peace.
~ApotheosisNow555
Vitas, would deleting the Lafont post enable you to sleep better at night? You seem consumed by what is a fringe issue at best. My intent was NOT to stir the Galactic pot... I was simply carrying over a post from another site. If this would give you some relief, let me know. No doubt Meline would be quite amazed to know someone is putting in so much energy to champion her message. Keep up the good works Vitas! ~In Light
God! You're a handsome man Vitas!
Vitas, I have nothing left to say on the Lafont issue... if there's something you feel I need to read simply post it on your wall & I'll check it out... otherwise, I look forward to reading the discussion you create to clear up the whole issue. ~In Light
Hey Vitas, why not take the time you're spending seeking an explanation from me to create a discussion that clears up the Lafont issue for yourself or anyone else interested. Bottom line: the confusion about her 'channeling' wasn't generated by me. & if Méline Lafont herself has a problem with the post (which again I did NOT write) she can easily correct the misunderstanding herself. ~ApotheosisNow555
Yeah Vitas, to be honest I don't remember exactly where I got the post... possibly 'Lightworkers.org'? If you're saying that the post is not from her... well, I'll take your word for it. I am curious to see how the data evolves, as she herself must know about the claim that the 'channeling' wasn't from her. If you can point me to the forum where she clarifies the situation I'd love to check it out. ~In Light