"India to us was a commercial asset and very lucrative for British commerce, but we also had a great love of this ancient civillisation and actually described it as an empire, within the Empire.....
The INDIAN EMPIRE (or British RAJ) was part of the…"
"So Britain ruled IN COLLABORATION with the very Indians themselves. Calling it a 'British empire' is an historical misnomer. It should be called 'indo-British empire', or something like that, just like we talk of 'medo-persian empire' even though…"
"Blue eyed cat -I'm not trying to start a argument by your comment about the US as the poorest nation in the future-news flash, I don't want this build out to happen, but there is a plan to import tens of millions of people from India, Asia, and…"
"Roaring said: "Fact is that Britain could not possibly rule even India alone, all the way from London. India now has the largest population in the world. For every one briton there might have been thousands of Indians! So how could they all be ruled…"
"Because these kind of people are obsessed with power, they won't listen to nobodies like me. That's probably complete nonsense. This is what is called a revolution and it is carried out by many. If the problem is a handful of people in government…"