Comments

• 

  Tiamacious June 18, 2011 at 7:58pm

  the power is within you john!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! inner earth blessings of peace tranquility, and destiny to you bro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I LOVE YOU BRO!!!
• 

  Jose Ignacio Contreras June 17, 2011 at 2:01am

  
• 

  Eagle sun as one June 8, 2011 at 2:08pm

  look forward to getting to know you John Jancar love light peace and joy from your new friend Eagle sun as one Namaste :)
• 

  Celestino June 6, 2011 at 2:37am

  Einstein used the concept of spacetime in general relativity which, as a whole, represents all of space and time. He did recognize however that we occupy an infinitesimal slice of spacetime, the present. Time travel into the past is not allowed by relativity. It also has serious logical flaws on causality.

   

  You are misreading into Einstein's comments on time and space being an illusion. You are to heavily laden by your beliefs. He was not alluding to something being beyond this reality.

   

  Quarks are heavily bound in the nuclei of an atom. Gluons are transmitters of the nuclear force with an extremely short lifetime. Neither of them could interact with the outer shell of an atom. The electromagnetic repulsion from the outer shell electrons is what leads to the solidity of matter.

   

  You have no idea what you are talking about, but, after all, you think school is for fools. So, I guess that is to be expected.

   

  Natural selectron does not necessitate that all strands of DNA have a purpose, as long as it works in storing and replicating its material. To assume that excess strands of DNA are related to super-human abilities is beyond presumptuous,
• 

  Celestino June 5, 2011 at 4:11am

  ---make intuitive sense in that the positive mass energy of the Universe cancels with the negative gravitational potential energy. Meaning we are what nothing looks like locally. Nothing becoming nothing has no qualm.

   

  Science is not a dogmatic institution. Any claim must be repeatable. if it is not, it does not remain a part of science.

   

  I'll get to your DNA bit after I take a short break.
• 

  Celestino June 5, 2011 at 4:08am

  Hahaha, you are poorly misinformed my friend. In fact, the proportionality ratio of Universal expansion is named the Hubble constant due to his discover of the singularity. It is why he became famous.

   

  Ah, I've watched his videos. I've read his coauthored book, and, most importantly I have taken Physics 435 and 460, special and general relativity. I've had to go through the arduous task of using his tensor calculus to solve general relativistic situations, often considered to be the most difficult mathematics around. Time and space are similar in that they BEND! They bend predictably and repeatably. They follow a specific set of equations. Even Einstein recognized the fundamental difference in time and space. Time is asymmetrical in that it flows in the direction of greater entropy, read Stephen Hawking. Space is a symmetrical dimension.

   

  A solid is physically defined as a collection of atoms or molecules which are rigidly bound such that free motion of the constituent particles is not allowed, due to the chemical bonds between them. The "solid" aspect of a solid is transmitted by the electromagnetic force, not by blunt "bumping into each other". They are zero dimensional particles, they can only interact via the four forces: gravity, electromagnetism, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear. The atom is 99% free of matter, but forces inhabit this area.

   

  Johannes Kepler showed that matter moves in elliptical orbits in a gravitational field. If gravity were the only force we'd all have been compacted long ago. In fact, you elliptical orbit argument has no grounds whatsoever. The match between the observed expansion of the Universe and the theoretical prediction is hailed as one of the greatest successes of science to date. They make T-shirts of it saying, "Science, it works bitches." And I ask you, did your imaginary Universe come into being in anymore explainable way? In fact, the singularity does--- (to be continued)
• 

  Celestino June 5, 2011 at 1:29am

  You should really stop saying that Einstein thought time was an illusion. Einstein showed that time, like space, is fluid and can change its forward progress, but it is still very much a part of reality.

   

  The steady state model does not fit the empirical evidence. For instance, the steady state cannot explain the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, which the Big Bang does so elegantly. In fact, the Big Bang predicted the CMB before it was experimentally found.

   

  The big bang, and subsequent inflation theory, was first discovered by Edwin Hubble. He found, through observation of redshift, that the velocity a galaxy was moving away from the observer was directly proportional to the distance of the galaxy from the observer. With this, if you backtracked in time, it would put all matter and energy in one space, called the singularity, 13.7 billion years ago.
• 

  Celestino June 5, 2011 at 12:28am

  Well, it wouldn't be the first time Hoyle was dead wrong. Ever heard of the steady state model?

   

  Discovery is mostly junk science that feeds the masses appetite for the spectacular.
• 

  Celestino June 4, 2011 at 4:28am

  It seems Crick's views on intelligent design or alien intervention amount to his belief in the panspermia theory. This view compiles to life on earth being sparked by microbial life on an asteroid.
• 

  Celestino June 4, 2011 at 4:14am

  Yeah, I'll defend my drug use. All I have ever used is marijuana and psilocybin mushrooms. I went to undergrad in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Marijuana is basically legal there, and it also home to one of the best research universities in the world.

   

  Overuse of anything isn't good, I'll agree.