To repeat, knowledge of the Uranian Astrology planets and knowledge of use of the 90 Degree Dial are required for this lesson. Personal Points (As, Mc, Moon, Sun, North Node, and Aries Point) get primaryā¦
I'm Pansexual, and Here's What I Want You to Know
PANSEXUAL IS A NEW ONE TO ME-I FEEL BADLY FOR THESE KIDS-EVIL SPITITSĀ RUINED THEM-THERE ARE ONLY TWO GENDERSĀ I'm Pansexual, and Here's What I Want You to KnowĀ©Ā Provided by PopSugarThe first timeĀ I came out to my parentsĀ was in 2013. I was 15 at theā¦
Read moreā¦
Views: 15
Comments
...Or so have relativists tried to convince us through the Einsteinian Barrier. If there is a signal that can travel faster than light, then you should be able to see that the belief in otherwise will put us in a needless danger of extinction!
So if there is anything urgent that ETs need to inform us about is the existence of this superluminal signal. A 'channelled message' or such things, allegedly from ETs lecturing us about Earthly politics, in the guise of 'they are important' is most certainly fake! A true ET will tell us the endless stories about where he is comming from, then when our turn comes, he eats the pop-corns and hear us tell him about our home!š There are far more important things to learn about the universe and interstellar travel than the issue of who is the next US president!š
Now there is, of course, the issue of whether the astronomers indeed have correctly calculated this ridiculously enormous energy they term it 'gamma ray burst'. To get a clue, it is the total energy that a star will emit in its entire lifespan all released in one second and all directed towards one place in a collimated manner! They calculate distance using the non-sequitur fallacy termed 'red shift'. Halton Arp have already shown evidence against this simplistic relationship.
But even if we were to say that indeed, the far away stars are more red shifted, the scientists are nevertheless still engaging in bad logic. They are essentially affirming the consequent, leading to a possibly severely distorted map of the universe. Lets agree that indeed Hubble discovered correctly that the further away a star is, the faster it moves away from us. Does this mean that the faster away the star moves from us, then the further away it is? Insisting that is an example of the fallacy of affirming the consequent. Yet the astronomers comfortably use red shift to map the universe, including mapping the origins of gamma ray burts at immense distances away from earth!
-
354
-
355
-
356
-
357
-
358
of 1244 Next