Weirdness at the Baltimore bridge collapse
Vehicles found 50 feet under the bridge before collapse by sonar? And why was the fire dept using sonar under the bridge before the collision? Singapore flag flown on the ship depicts a lunar eclipse?MORE DETAILS, mysteries surrounding the Francis…
Read more…
Comments
But they were bamboozled by the Iran-Iraq war in a way that shows that the American elites had a very thin understanding of politics. A monumental lesson was awaiting! Now Irani Shias were not able to divide Iraqi and woo the Shia majority, knocking down Saddam. So at first, it seems to suggest that the Shias in Iraq are too patriotic to ever listen to their fellows in Iran. Right? Wrong!! In a WAR between Iran and Iraq, the Sunnis might team up with the Shias in Iraq because both are Arabs and Iranis are Persians. So another dividing factor comes. But the U.S. lead coalition forces relied totally on military superiority to topple Saddam, not the politics. Specifically, they did not begine by trying to woo one fighting group to their side. They rained bombs in the air with the country that had no air force. This suggested that they simply allow the Americans to do what they want. So we cannot know if when it comes to fighting the Americans, the shias would Join the Americans! Iraqis simply did not fight the Americans initially. Then afterwards they now fought a guerrilla war. This US power creats an illusion that the Shias (such as Kataib Hezbollah) behaved differently towards the Americans than they did towards the Iranis because this round 'they wanted Saddam gone'! In fact they would have fought Americans even while they were trying to topple Saddam, just like they fought the Iranis except that the US's air force was too powerful!!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shia%E2%80%93Sunni_relations
False Flag
What I am saying is that it is the people of Afghanistan, and perharps to some extent Iran, Pakistan and other adjuscent countries who should be left to decide whether or not they want a secular state, a theocracy, a sharia law in Afghanistan. If others such as Germans etc donnot like Islamic Theocracy, they should migrate and leave in their good country in Germany rather than waiting to be 'persecuted' there and then cry for 'the world to take war to Afghanistan'. Also what I am saying is that beware of US and other Talibani enemies propaganda when reading things or watching media. They may exaggerate or give only half the story. That is all what I am saying. I am not saying 'Talibanis are good'.I don't think any group of fighters anywhere, including state armies are 'good'!
Contrary to what US seems to believe, democracy is not just 'an opportunity to vote'. Pple are not voting machines. Faith in institutions is absolutely necessary for democracy. Institutions created by foreigners, including fighting groups, can never be trusted to oversee elections. We see now in US the 'democracy' means little because they have lost faith in their institutions. This means US should be doing something about its own democracy. It is not yet time to attempt to 'democratize' other countries! It should be first trying to creat trust in its own institutions!!
"9:123
ﭑ ﭒ ﭓ ﭔ ﭕ ﭖ ﭗ ﭘ ﭙ ﭚ ﭛ ﭜ ﭝ ﭞ ﭟ ﭠ ﭡ ﭢ
O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you, and let them find severity in you. Know well that Allah is with the God-fearing"
It is such verses in Quran that extremists, like ISIS etc uses. But they are refusing to understand Quran as, at best, a 'word of God' framed my a human in such a way as a human can understand. (of course for non Muslim, at worst it is just a human concoction). If God wished, he could talk to us directly face to face now, and tell us if anything, what he wants us to do. We don't need to read 6000 years old books to learn about a being supposedly here with us now!
During the times when Quran was written, religions in Arabia was at constant hostility towards each other, and especially towards new religions. It was a worse form of what was taking place in Palestine etc. Consider Jesus surrounded by Pharisees, Saducees and all these other 'Jews' almost every time Jesus says anything contrary to Judaism, they pick up stones to stone him! It was this way in Arabia, but much worse! Even in Palestine, during Jesus's time, the 'non-beleiver' of Jesus almost meant 'the one against Jesus'. (Hence Jesus said 'he who is not with me is against me) It doesn't mean the same thing it means today! It was much worse in Arabia.
So Muhammad was trying to tell his followers that Islam is not a pacifist religion. That the 'non-believers' are out to fight them to try to exterminate Islam, like they did to Christians was obvious and 'Muhammad' needed not to write it, nor could he foresee the distant future, which is our time of religious tolerance.