Can you see the images in this?
Fixing a water stain in the basement-see any images in the stain?
Read more…You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Comments are closed.
Fixing a water stain in the basement-see any images in the stain?
Read more…What Is The Core Of Your Life On Earth? By Steven Hutchinson Wesak, on May 23, is where we think of and celebrate the birth and life of Buddha....Remember Buddha turned away from family riches to find his own inner peace and…
Read more…The Dark Origins of the Davos’ Great ResetBy F. William EngdahlGlobal Research, April 22, 2024Theme: Intelligence 1027 201 680 2123https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/DavosMW-600x338-300x169.png 300w,…
Read more…Full Moon for Washington D.C. is April 23, 2024, 7:50 pm. This Full Moon will be intense; the Moon will be in Conjunction with the Ascendant (or eastern horizon point [and the "rising sign" is Scorpio]). A…
Comments
In fact, nothing can be further from the truth.
We are all on multiple timelines and they overlap but they are not the same.
While we argue who is right, we look stupid to higher dimensional beings who know that every truth is there in a different timeline.
Those timelines develop, intensify with more people on them or go away based on what is manifested.
It seems that fear of uncertainty is what lead pple form such beleifs. They don't want 'i don't know' in their vocabulary cause they fear unknown!! So they opt to simply equate their knowledge with reality! When they don't know, it simply doesn't exist. So technically, 'they know everything'. So why worry?
Nope!! Such is a typical example of what scientific claims are not!! They are not claims that are incapable of being falsified!!
Please take time to understand QM and don't read such articles, if you want to understand QM, thats my advice!! They mislead terribly. In QM, both the quantum state 'before measurement' and 'after measurement' are observable, as such the 'observation' talked about is not a conscious registration in one's mind. In this way, we can study QM and check if indeed a state is different 'when we are not observing it'. We see the wavicle 'collapse' when we 'observe', and fail to do so 'when we don't observe'! So the 'observation' is not a conscious one!!
Indeed no one can actually observe an electron. Electron is far too small to see one. Therefore it is misleading to say that QM teaches pple that 'the world come out when we observe' as the articles rampantly champions!
“To know that one knows what one knows, and to know that one doesn't know what one doesn't know, is true wisdom and knowledge” – Confucius
Brighteon.com/fc63b141-7205-4d89-843c-9edd7ccd738b
He says that in QM, like in 'Chinese thought' (whatever such means), we are not interested in what happens before we make an observation. He says that like cows, 'chinese' forgets entirely about 'grass' when it gets behind to their butts! They only think about something when they are starring at it head on, and that this is what QM is all about. The objects, so he says, comes in to existence when we stare at them and yes, when we so wish! Our eyes are more formidable than the words of Yahweh! We creat mountains and destroy them instantly. So why care about things when you are not starring directly at them? Why care about your child crossing the door out there if they nolonger exist anyway, based solely on the fact that you are not seeing it any more?
Apart from making a wrong claim about whay QM teaches about subatomic world, he further cantilevers another eror by applying QM directly in the classic, macroscopic world!!
Think about it! If QM only talks of things as it appears to an observer, then we could summarize QM with a single sentence 'everything is a dot' and close textbooks and go home!! What is the purpose of libraries of books, insanely complex mathematics and behemoth laboratories?
First be careful about what physicists say when they are drunk! Unfortunately this is all what a layman knows about QM!
How do you observe a particle which is also an 'empty space'? Please ask a physicist to stick his textbook up his butts and explain it for you. What is it that they see in particle accelerators? Are they starring on zero-dimensional non-entities? Are they looking at an empty space and then claim that they have discovered a particle?
BTW Bohr had a pipeline that took beer right from a factory to his home!! This guy, together with Heisenberg was a pair of morons who help destroy rational physics!