Full Moon for Washington D.C. is April 23, 2024, 7:50 pm. This Full Moon will be intense; the Moon will be in Conjunction with the Ascendant (or eastern horizon point [and the "rising sign" is Scorpio]). A…
The Dark Origins of the Davos’ Great Reset
The Dark Origins of the Davos’ Great ResetBy F. William EngdahlGlobal Research, April 22, 2024Theme: Intelligence 1027 201 680 2123https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/DavosMW-600x338-300x169.png 300w,…
Read more…
Comments
It is like, seeing a problem with Christianity, you move directly to Buddhism, Islam or atheism, like a numbskull. If one can lie, why can't the other?
With best of intentions, many remote viewers and channellers could be picking up on shared imprints within a collective psychic/telepathic field too, or filtering through them without realizing...rather than what is beyond...
We all have the choice every moment though, to stand in a place of Universal Love that encompasses the duality field and sends Love and Peace and Joy into it, for the Whole...
That's how Unity Consciousness anchors...just as in other galactic civilzations operating in Love...truly, we can do this...🌟😊
I've used a visualization/affirmation practice called the Golden Apple for many years, as a focus for maintaining the integrity of my light-field...and also as a transformer of energies...I'll link the page it's on below, for anyone this might appeal to:
https://heartstar.org/2014/03/30/four-foundational-heart-practices/
You see that suing media for lieing is unreasonably difficult. This gives them a licence to lie.
When US first ammendment was made, they probably never had a monopolistic media controled by cabal in mind. The only thing capable of monopoly was the state itself.
But if the media becomes part of the 'deep state', then the 'freedom of media' is nolonger about protecting citizens. It is now a protection of the elites against the rest of the citizens demanding truth, the opposite of what was perhaps intended!!
They say, for instance, that we must prove that the lies were 'intentional', which is almost impossible as intent is in the mind where we can't demonstrate!
Another one is that we must prove that the lies caused a damage, a meaningless criteria. Lieing is a vice in and on itself, whether or not it causes any damage, and should never be protected by any law!
Lastly they only consider the damage that the lies does to those who are lied about and never the damage that the lies does to those who are lied to! In the case of a 'democracy' this is dangerous as the public is the judge who listens from the witness offered by the media. It is very unwise that they did not realize this. In courts they did see that we can't make a law that protect lies from the witnesses. It is here did they realize that lieing should never be taken lightly!
The rule should be simple: if someone demonstrates that media lied about anything or anyone, that media should be fined and / or de-licensed! They do so in courts, why not to media? If you offer false testimony in court, then you do a crime!
As far as I can tell, reports about COVID does not meet this criteria. Media usurps the duty of science and other 'experts', rather than public.
But the same thing applies to the alternate media, for instance when it talks of 'stolen US elections'. The asurp the duty of electoral commissions.
Media also should never do criminal investigations, intelligent information etc. These areas should be left to people who can be sued for telling lies!