Full Moon for Washington D.C. is April 23, 2024, 7:50 pm. This Full Moon will be intense; the Moon will be in Conjunction with the Ascendant (or eastern horizon point [and the "rising sign" is Scorpio]). A…
The Dark Origins of the Davos’ Great Reset
The Dark Origins of the Davos’ Great ResetBy F. William EngdahlGlobal Research, April 22, 2024Theme: Intelligence 1027 201 680 2123https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/DavosMW-600x338-300x169.png 300w,…
Read more…
Comments
However, the guy is not honest in claiming that the quantum correction to general relativity occurs in scales far greater than the so called 'Planck's Length', such as in 'dark matter'. If dark matter does not exist, then GR is wrong at scales larger than a galaxy, not smaller than Planck's Length, hence a quantum theory of gravity cannot be a correction to GR that explains 'dark matter'.
In a closely similar case, a quantum correction to GR will not explain superluminal UAP because the UAP is in the 'Newtonian Scale' not even the GR scale.
GR simply cannot explain such small things as UAP, as this is the scale where Newts Gravity reigns supreme! To explain UFOs, we need to SUPERSEDE these theories, not to COMPLETE them!
https://www.uaptheory.com/
If military could launch nukes even without any military gain, then they could kill us using bullets, grenades, etc. We don't need nukes to carry out genocides!
Sending a clear message (and keeping less friendly beings' hands off buttons) however, has obviously been considered necessary, since they've taken such overt, directed actions.
This belief is not true. Destroying life on earth is not in anyone's interest here on earth. Perhaps ETs are there, but the theory that they actively prevent a nuclear war at every moment is not necessary to explain the fact thay nukes have never been used except twice. There are better explanations that are in line with how we observe military operations here on earth since the dawn of history. We don't see our governments anywhere on earth respond with airstrikes to react to a civilian riots. To address this issue, we must understand the nature of military operations.
What if US president orders that a nuke be launched on Tehran. Will military executive this? The answer is no! Military is not private dogs for the president. (Btw Gaddaffi orderd military to bomb rioters but this order was disobeyed ). So nukes, or any other weapon for that matter, are not in the fingures of one person. The president issues orders, but the military also check if the orders are in line with military rules. Non of the nuke order will be in line with military rules (except if there is a military city to be destroyed). Thus humans, not necessarily ETs prevents nuclear war. A lot of people must first agree on it, which is unlikely.
We must not credit ETs for human work and responsibilities. We must not creat 'hatred for humans and love for ETs' without adequate reasons.
Also note that originally, it was pure democracy! Saul was ELECTED. He didn't force in using an army, as there was no elite army yet. So it is pple who freely gave their power to a few in the hope that 'they will effectively fight their battles'. But it eventually came out just as Samuel warned! Once they gave out their power, it was not easy to take it back.
The king grew corrupt and forgot that it was the pple who gave him the power. He abused the power to rule over the pple rather than lead them as he was commissioned.
It is foolish to create something that you yourself cannot fight it, with the hope that 'it will fight your enemy'. Once it is through with the 'enemy', it will turn on you! Now it is your turn to fight it!
If the founders of US were to resurrect, they would be astonished to see the kind of beast US had become! This was the exact thing they were warned against, e.g. in the second amendment, but they did not understand it! The duty to defend the country is on the citizens themselves not 'the elites'. They knew that with elite army, there can be no real power in the people!
So the second amendment was meant to read:
Since a well regulated citizen fighters (as opposed to a standing army) are the ones that must defend the state, the rights of citisens to bear arms must not be infringed. Second amendment was meant to obviate the need for 'elites', not for 'personal protection'.