1999 NOAA Image of Flying City over the Pacific

8110427873?profile=originalExcerpt from StarGate Earth by Elizabeth Trutwin, 2012
© All Rights Reserved.

To Begin With

In response to the Disclosure Petition I, by Steve Bassett, the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) at the White House stated, “The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race.”
The White House Petition website is the most powerful and profound offering to be seen in Washington in many decades. We cannot underestimate its impact for raising collective consciousness. This is our chance to participate in Action Politics to reclaim our role as constituents in our government for the people and by the people. “The right to petition your government is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. We the People provides a new way to petition the Obama Administration to take action on a range of important issues facing our country. We created We the People because we want to hear from you. If a petition gets enough support, White House staff will review it, ensure it’s sent to the appropriate policy experts, and issue an official response.” https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/how-why/introduction
Steve Bassett of Paradigm Research Group has said as long as there is a White House Petition site there will be a Petition from PRG asking for Disclosure. http://ParadigmResearchGroup.org To date, after 5 Petitions addressing Disclosure specifically we still have not received a proper response. We must keep trying because Self-Disclosure is the only Path to Freedom, the Path to Peace.


A Little Ancient History

The Occupy Movement has called a lot of attention to the bought and sold Supreme Court Justices in the United States as well as the corporate-owned Politicians. In order for me to share information on the StarGates it is necessary to look at the corruption we see in the papers everyday. Most of the stories published are not true. They are designed to program society to believe what is convenient for the few who wish to control the many. There are those who feel President Obama is not working toward Peace. I would like to say that the media makes it look that way. Much of what he does behind the scenes at the International Space Station and other undisclosed locations goes unreported. I invite you to set aside your political differences and hear the story from the perspective up above. The purpose of this book is not to expose political opinion. Collective Consciousness on Earth has been taught, programmed, to believe a Grand Illusion. The purpose of this book is to spotlight Planet Earthʻs Great Beauty in her Seas, Lakes, Mountains and Portals and the Secrets which lie there. It is to show the connection between the people of Earth and all the Cosmos. It is also to make a plea to end all nuclear weapons so the beauty which is Earth can prosper. May the Force Be With You.

When we look at the chaos in the world today it reminds me of an old bedtime story called the Ramayana. This legend myth has been dated back thousands of years. Whether it is history or legend is open to wide debate. In this Hindu Epic there was a small group led by the King of Lanka, Ravana. Ravana was a monster with 10 heads and 20 arms. He had armies and a castle with a harem and all forms of excess. He drove around in a golden chariot translated as a “flying car.” He was causing harm to the peoples in all the surrounding territories and claiming control over everything. It was widely felt he could not be defeated. A young Prince of a Kingdom known for truth and love named Rama set out to battle the monster king. In fact, it was known since before he was born, by the holy sages and by his parents that he was coming to Earth to defeat Ravana and restore peace in the land. It had been said that Ravana could only be destroyed by a man in flesh. Rama was said to be an incarnation of God himself as a man. He fought Ravana with all forms of weapons. Rama also drove around and did battle from his “flying car.” Are we repeating history now? How is that? All over Earth are just a handful of people, who through control of the banks, lands and military, including nuclear weapons, have announced that they own everything and the ʻlittle manʻ should pay more taxes and submit to the will of a few. These are the same Ones who control the media to hold sway collective opinion based on false flags of terror. If we can work together to rid Earth of Nuclear Weapons, arrest the War Criminals trying to control Earth and restore Peace we create an environment for Disclosure. In an environment of Peace our Galactic Family will be able to land their Ships and share their wondrous technologies. It all begins with Self-Disclosure. Enter the White House Petition.

The White House Petition

The Computerized Petition Has Not Been Without Its Problems

The We the People Website at the White House has posted these Guidelines on their site:
“The White House will respond to petitions submitted through We the People that comply with these Terms of Participation and reach the second signature threshold listed below. Petitions on We the People must meet the first signature threshold in order to be publicly searchable on http://WhiteHouse.gov Petitions that do not meet these signature thresholds will be removed from the site after the time limit has expired. The White House may elect to respond to petitions at any time, including those that have not crossed the first or second threshold.
To avoid the appearance of improper influence, the White House may decline to address certain procurement, law enforcement, adjudicatory, or similar matters properly within the jurisdiction of federal departments or agencies, federal courts, or state and local government in its response to a petition.

...the limited purpose of the We the People platform, which is to allow individuals to petition the Administration to take action on a range of issues — to address a problem, support or oppose a proposal, or otherwise change or continue federal government policy or actions. To focus discussion, the platform is limited to a discrete set of topics, which may be adjusted over time.”

There have been many problems in the past with getting booted off the site, having trouble creating an account and having trouble logging in to sign a petition. The White House We The People website suddenly was dealing with more traffic to the site than they could handle. Also, in October of 2011 the threshold for signatures was increased from 5,000 to 25,000 to receive a response from the White House. It is too hard to get 25,000 signatures in 30 days even with national press conferences, interviews and massive web coverage. We should ask the White House website to lower the threshold to a fair number around 15,000. This keeps their administrative duties down and is also a number which can be completed for serious petitions in 30 days.

The following is a Disclosure Petition I added to the White House Website in February 2012:
Given the national security implications, the United States should conduct an independent investigation.
This inquiry must transparently review the National Space Council with access to classified documents. It must have the power to call witnesses and grant immunity.
The findings should be publicly presented.
The Members who have knowledge of the National Space Council and their Annual Congressional Reports from 1989-1992 were:
Section 1. Establishment and Composition of the National Space Council.
(a) There is established the National Space Council (“the Council”).
(b) The Council shall be composed of the following members:
(1) The Vice President, who shall be Chairman of the Council;
(2) The Secretary of State;
(3) The Secretary of the Treasury;
(4) The Secretary of Defense;
(5) The Secretary of Commerce;
(6) The Secretary of Transportation;
(7) The Director of the Office of Management and Budget;
(8) The Chief of Staff to the President;
(9) The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs;
(10) The Assistant to the President for Science and Technology;
(11) The Director of Central Intelligence; and
(12) The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
(c) The Chairman shall, from time to time, invite the following to participate in meetings of the Council:
(1) The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and
(2) The heads of other executive departments and agencies and other senior officials in the Executive Office of the President.
By reviewing the Annual Reports we gain Self-Disclosure from our Government Officials regarding satellite images of ET/UFO activities and an understanding of the inner workings of the Earth Observing System (EOS) satellite Terra (formerly AM-1) and the conflicts between Ex-NASA Chief Richard H. Truly and President George H. W. Bush. None of the above named Council who had knowledge of these reported findings ever shared publicly the details of a program with a budget in the billions.
The two following articles from the New York Times from 1990 and 1992 outline the Moon and Mars Bases Mission and the desperate need for Disclosure.
NYT 1990
“NASA Losing 30-Year Monopoly In Planning for Moon and Mars~New York Times
By WILLIAM J. BROAD
Published: January 15, 1990
 The White House is reaching beyond NASA in a search for new ways to advance the nation’s manned space program, challenging a near monopoly the agency has held for more than three decades. It is doing so mainly out of frustration with the agency’s high cost estimates for space ventures.

It has asked two groups, the National Academy of Sciences and the Aerospace Industries Association, to conduct the search. The hope is that they will uncover bold new ideas from industry, academia and Federal research centers on how to send Americans to the Moon and Mars, as President Bush vowed to do last year.
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration will still have a fundamental role in evaluating many of the ideas, as well as developing its own. But its dominance in planning for the manned space program is being challenged for the first time in history.
An Unprecedented Move
”This has never happened before,” said Dr. John M. Logsdon, director of the Space Policy Institute at George Washington University and a White House adviser. ”This is an open window for new ideas.”
Arnold D. Aldrich, NASA’s associate director for aeronautics and space technology, said the agency felt the move was ”highly appropriate.”
”We think there definitely are other ideas out there,” he said. ”A lot of our ideas are good, but we certainly haven’t covered the waterfront.”
The process has already begun. A panel set up by the industry association, which represents 54 aerospace companies, met for the first time last week, and the other panel is to start work this week. Among the new ideas already under study are building cheap, inflatable spaceships and using less astronaut labor in favor of robots for assembly in space.
Federal officials said the National Space Council, whose chairman is Vice President Dan Quayle, turned to the groups mainly out of frustration with the cost of NASA’s plan to go back to the Moon and then on to Mars. Rough estimates put it at $400 billion over three decades.
Mr. Quayle suggested the change on Wednesday in a speech to astronomers, saying President Bush had asked the space council to create an ”aggressive” space program that challenged ”accepted ways of doing business.” The council is searching for ”innovative approaches” that go ”across the traditional divisions,” Mr. Quayle said.
The council, made up of Mr. Quayle and directors of 10 Federal agencies, is the Administration’s top body for the formation of space policy.
(Page 2 of 3)
 A Federal official familiar with the council’s plan, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the approach was fundamentally new.
”There’s never been a case where outside bodies were used in a quasi-operational capacity, as envisioned here,” the official said. ”The independent review is to make sure that any good idea, no matter who the owner is, gets fair and equal treatment. We want a system that allows all the good ideas to rise to the surface.”
The change comes as the Bush Administration struggles to achieve what some experts dismiss as an impossible dream, given the nation’s budget woes.
Last July, on the 20th anniversary of the first lunar landing, Mr. Bush called on the United States to establish a manned base on the Moon and to send an expedition to Mars. Skeptics belittled the speech as political rhetoric with no firm commitment of money. White House officials, citing rough NASA studies, conceded that the goals might cost $400 billion and that concrete plans had yet to be developed.
Mr. Bush put the project in the hands of the space council, which asked NASA to do a quick study of its feasibility. That report was delivered to the White House in November, generating mixed reviews. It laid out five approaches for meeting the President’s goals, using techniques and technologies the agency had studied for years and sometimes decades. At the earliest, the plans envisioned a human presence on the Moon in 2001 and on Mars by 2011.
In late November, a 15-person panel of scientists and aerospace experts gathered at the White House at Mr. Quayle’s request to help him assess the NASA report. They included Dr. Logsdon; Edward C. Aldridge, former Air Force Secretary; Dr. Thomas Paine, former NASA director; Dr. Carl Sagan, the astronomer; Dr. Edward Teller, the weapon scientist; Dr. Charles H. Townes, an inventor of the laser, and Harrison Schmitt, a former United States Senator and former astronaut.
A Federal official said the panel confirmed Mr. Quayle’s feeling that ”a redirection was necessary for the success of this effort.”
New Concepts
On Dec. 19, Mr. Quayle wrote Vice Adm. Richard H. Truly, NASA’s administrator, saying he wanted ”to insure that all reasonable conceptual space exploration alternatives have been evaluated.” The Moon-Mars effort, he said, needed to consider ”different architectures, new systems concepts, promising new technologies and innovative uses of existing technologies.”
Published: January 15, 1990
(Page 3 of 3)
 Mr. Quayle asked NASA to ”take the lead” in the search, without specifying how. So far, the White House has received no formal reply, although NASA officials have informally agreed to go along with the search.
Mr. Aldrich of NASA said in an interview that his office would head the effort. ”We’re putting together a plan” that will be at the White House by the end of the month, he said.
Last week, Federal officials outlined several steps they said would widen the search and insure its thoroughness and objectivity.
In addition to the NASA effort, they said, a 20-person panel from the Aerospace Industries Association is looking at the process of gathering new ideas, seeing if new channels need to be cut through the Federal bureaucracy and its procurement process. The panel met for the first time last week in Washington, with an interim report to the White House due by the end of March.
”We’re also looking at how you manage an effort as large and long as the human exploration initiative,” said James C. Harrington, chairman of the panel. Mr. Harrington is a vice president of Kaman Aerospace Corporation of Rosslyn, Va.
One Federal official described the industrial association’s role as ”looking over NASA’s shoulder to make sure they’re evaluating things fairly” in an examination of the decision-making process.
Arm of Academy of Sciences
Another review is centered at the National Research Council, the main operating arm of the National Academy of Sciences, a federally chartered but independent organization that studies technical issues for the Government. The council’s study is directed by Dr. H. Guyford Stever, a former Presidential science adviser who headed the academy’s study of the redesign of NASA’s faulty shuttle booster rocket.
The 16-person panel is reviewing NASA’s plan and conducting its own hunt for innovative ideas. It will hold its first formal meeting this week when it conducts a workshop, by invitation only. ”We’ll search as broadly as we can,” said Dr. Stever. ”I personally think one has to think of fairly large concepts rather than gadgets.”
Its report is due at the end of February. The White House is also discussing with the academy a way to insure its long-term participation in the Moon-Mars venture, especially in reviewing the innovative concepts gathered by NASA.
Among the new ideas already getting attention is one from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California that proposes to use inflatable parts, rather than rigid metal structures, to build a space station, Moon base and Mars probe. The Livermore goal is to reduce the project cost from $400 billion to $40 billion.
Another idea is to reduce the amount of time astronauts spend assembling structures, relying instead on robots and so-called smart machines or on pre-assembled ships and bases.
Federal officials say virtually nothing has been ruled out, that even proposals from foreign experts would be considered.
”What we want,” said an official, ”is to be sure we’ve examined every model” of how to go to the Moon and Mars – ”the compact, the mid-size and the luxury.””
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/01/15/us/nasa-losing-30-year-monopoly-in-planning-for-moon-and-mars.html?src=pm
NYT 1992
“Space Council Cuts NASA’s Role In Exploration of Moon and Mars~NYT 3.14.1992
Published: March 14, 1992
 The National Space Council tightened its control over space activities today by dividing NASA’s responsibility for the Moon-Mars project among several Government agencies.
Vice President Dan Quayle, who heads the space council, made public a space policy directive approved by President Bush that assigns “major roles” to the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy while establishing the National Aeronautics and Space Administration as the principal agency in the project.
On July 20, 1989, the 20th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing, Mr. Bush declared a goal to establish a base on the Moon and to send human expeditions to Mars. Later, he set a goal to have the Mars landing by the year 2019. A Lukewarm Reception.
Cost estimates for the 30-year project have ranged from $400 billion to more than $500 billion. But the project, called the Space Exploration Initiative, has received a lukewarm reception in Congress and has been very little push from the Bush Administration. Only $8.5 million has been spent on the initiative to date.
For example, NASA had requested $51 million for the project in the current fiscal year, but the Administration asked for $14 million less when it submitted its budget to Congress. In the fiscal year 1991, Congress refused to spend any money for the initiative.
But Mr. Quayle’s announcement said the new directive was a reaffirmation of America’s commitment to space exploration. It draws on recommendations made last year by the Synthesis Group, headed by Thomas Stafford, a former astronaut.
In response to the Stafford report the space agency set up an exploration office, and the directive calls for that office to be staffed both by NASA “and representatives from other participating agencies.”
The exploration office is charged with preparing an annual status report, and the directive requires the exploration office to present its first report to the National Space Council, outlining options for carrying out the missions. It also orders that a strategic plan be submitted by April 1993 and every year thereafter.
The space council, a creation of the Bush Administration, has long been at odds with NASA’s astronaut-oriented management. The council has said repeatedly that the space agency’s programs have taken too long and cost too much, and has called on NASA to seek new ideas and new techniques from universities, Federal laboratories and private business.
The dispute led to the resignation last month of the NASA administrator, Richard H. Truly, who is a former astronaut. On Wednesday the President named Daniel S. Goldin, an industry pioneer in making civil spacecraft and spy satellites, as Mr. Truly’s successor. The Senate must confirm the nomination.”
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/14/us/space-council-cuts-nasa-s-role-in-exploration-of-moon-and-mars.html?src=pm” If you are interested in signing the White House Petitions, anyone over 13 may sign WH.gov/WixX and Wh.gov/WiQk Thank you.
http://CosmicAscension.org,NEW http://ElizabethTrutwin.org If you would like a copy of either or both StarGate Earth or Lord Ashtar and the Galactic Federation all you have to do is send me an email - I will add you to my updates list and email the two free Ebooks until October 31, 2012. Please email this message to friends and invite them to get the books. I am here in Service and my Mission is to help with Full Galactic Disclosure. Namaste. ~beth
eltrutwin@gmail.com

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • THOSE WHO CRY OUT FOR DISCLOSURE ARE STILL STUCK IN THE 3rd DIMENSIONAL FREQUENCY

    VIDEO @ 2.27

  • The partition should be to get Obama out of the Whitehouse first.. You really have to be thick if you still do not know that there is life on other Planets and about UFO's and Extraterrestrials SO WHY ARE YOU WAITING FOR DISCLOSURE???  FORGET ABOUT THE BASES on Mars and the Moon CONCENTRATE ON PLANET EARTH

    DO NOT LOOK TO OTHER NEW PLANETS TO SURVIVE ON WHEN YOU MAKE NO EFFORT TO CARE FOR THE PLANET YOU CALL HOME .

    VIDEO @ 1.05

This reply was deleted.

Sananda, One Who Serves and Shoshanna - THE GREAT AWAKENING IS NOW COMING TO A CONCLUSION via James McConnell

ANCIENT AWAKENINGS Sunday Call 3/27/2022 (Sananda, OWS, & Shoshanna)James & JoAnna McConnell THE GREAT AWAKENING IS NOW COMING TO A CONCLUSION Sananda and One Who Serves channeled by James McConnellShoshanna – Joanna’s Higher Self These messages…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 1513

Ashtar, One Who Serves and Shoshanna - YOU ARE CREATING YOUR NEW REALITY via James McConnell

ANCIENT AWAKENINGS  Sunday Call 3/20/2022 (Ashtar, OWS, & Shoshanna)James & JoAnna McConnell YOU ARE CREATING YOUR NEW REALITY Ashtar and One Who Serves channeled by James McConnellShoshanna – Joanna’s Higher Self These messages were given during…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 729

Copyright Policy: Always Include 30-50% of the source material and a link to the original article. You may not post, modify, distribute, or reproduce in any way any copyrighted material, trademarks, or other proprietary information belonging to others without obtaining the prior written consent of the owner of such proprietary rights. If you believe that someone's work has been copied and posted on Ashtar Command in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please Contact Us and include the links to these pages and relevant info. 

Latest Activity

Movella commented on Movella's blog post Arcturian visitations ✨
"Good question Randy, which Drekx provided an excellent response too.
For further context, my soul name ‘Movella’ was discovered in the Akashic records and confirmed to us by our plejaren contact Quetzel..
In Atlantian times my name was ‘Ovella’…"
10 minutes ago
Love & Joy posted a discussion
...Mary, Mother of All ~ This is a non-denominational Healing Meditation to connect with your Sacred Dream and the Unconditional Love & Grace of the Divine through the consciousness and Spirit of Mother Mary. Mother Mary is here for everyone,…
47 minutes ago
Love & Joy posted a discussion
 https://content.app-us1.com/cdn-cgi/image/onerror=redirect,width=65... alt="" width="446" data-bit="iit" />Mother Mary's Blessings Flowing To You I am…
1 hour ago
RandyFirstContact commented on Movella's blog post Arcturian visitations ✨
"It is also interesting what you said about pigs. In certain Ascended Master teachings organizations, the chelas I have met won't eat pork. They explained that pigs contained human DNA from the time of Atlantis. So it is interesting to have that…"
1 hour ago
RandyFirstContact commented on Movella's blog post Arcturian visitations ✨
"Thanks for that data Drekx. Sirian is a language I will definitely have to master one day. The language is rich with spiritual wisdom and meaning.

And thanks for the explanation on the development of the third strand of DNA. That makes sense. I…"
2 hours ago
Drekx Omega commented on Movella's blog post Arcturian visitations ✨
"Randy, as a bonus regarding Sirian names: KALESTRA......which translates as follows.....

Kal is a Sirian word meaning "crystal" and can also suggest "crystalline." The word "es" is used to suggest "perfection" and the femine form of "tro" is "tra"…"
3 hours ago
Drekx Omega commented on Movella's blog post Arcturian visitations ✨
"I would suggest that esoterically, the determinant factor for the active third strand is evolutionary experience, as that process of growth is attained through incarnating in the world and raising consciousness and therefore light quotient...…"
3 hours ago
RandyFirstContact commented on Movella's blog post Arcturian visitations ✨
"Hi Movella. A couple of questions. What does the name Merrtro mean? I am assuming this is a Sirian name.

Also do you know if most starseed children being born like Merrtro have their 3rd strand of DNA fully activated? Sheldan talked about how many…"
4 hours ago
More…