THE LECERTA FILE
04/22/2000
Comment from Christian Pfeiler
UFO298@aol.com
(Translator of this text and editor of "UFO + PSI Research Magazine)
Some weeks ago, I was asked from an online-friend if I can translate a certain document concerning the truth about UFOs, aliens and our real history. He said that he had received this fascinating file from a friend from Sweden, whose name is Ole K. (no full name available) and who claimed that he had made an interview with a non-human reptilian being. He claimed furthermore that this document contains the absolute truth about UFOs and aliens (if someone would give me only 100 DM for every "absolute truth about UFOs" I've read in the last years, I would be a rich man <<g>).
I knew my online-contact as a strong believer in UFOs but also as an intelligent young man who knows many things about physics and sightings, so I was very surprised when I read the weird document called "Lacerta File I" the first time and I asked him if he really believe in this science-fiction-story.
He was absolutely sure and said, that Ole K. is a personal friend of him and that he would never lie. Concerning evidence, he told me that he have read the whole transcript and that he saw the drawings and the audio tapes Ole K. mentioned in his introduction. I suppose every other "normal" UFO researcher had deleted this file immediately, but I'm "crazy" enough to try to translate it <<g>. I have warned my friend that my English is rather bad (as you know) but he was sure that I can do it and so I have tried to translate it somehow understandable (maybe a good exercise for me.) This means neither that I'm responsible for the content of this file not that I believe that it's true, this means only that I've done a translation job for a friend. I have tried to make it easier to read by the use of some brackets (the original German text - which was a translation from Swedish - was in a very confusing form) and I'm also not sure if I have always used the correct words, but I hope it is understandable.
My personal opinion (after translating this weird text for nearly one week) is, that the text is a really good science-fiction story but never the truth or reality. The answers and questions are always more or less logical, but I think the whole message is too unbelievable to be true (especially the scientific things) and in my opinion, the "being" tries too often to avoid the answering of too difficult questions because the author of the whole text was not able to know an answer. But my job was a translation job and not commenting the content of the file. I was asked if I can publish this file in the next issue of the magazine, but I think it's to long and also too weird to be part of our magazine, but as I was asked to send it to as many people as possible, I decided to send it as a normal RTF-File (compatible with most word processors) to you. If this stuff is too weird for you, please delete it. The things mentioned in the file are definitely not my opinion or my belief. Sorry for the wrong words and grammar.
Make your own opinion and let me know what you think.
Bye
Chris
Replies
Thank you my brother for posting here.
I was going to reply after reading this post,
then I seen your reply.
And now i feel I no longer need to reply to it. (:
Thanks Lightspeed .. this is an interesting article to say the least .... one part that intrigues me is when asked about the Hollow Earth, she makes this debatable point .. Earth is not really completely hollow and there is no second sun inside. This story is ridiculous and physically not possible (even your species should be intelligent enough not to believe this.) ...
That sort of blows the whole Hollow Earth / Central Sun story out the window ..
Anyway, I enjoyed reading it although I dont know if its true or not.. I feel very gaurded lately reading a lot of stuff in here ...
This story is, to me, much like the way the translator, Christian Pfeiler describes it as... as he says, the whole message is too unbelievable to be true ...
If the "being" tries too often to avoid the answering of too difficult questions because the author of the whole text was not able to know an answer, as is stated in the blog above, then to my mind, it sounds like the work of one person with a very active imagination ... and therefore it may be disinformation ... however, what is true for one may vastly differ to that of their neighbor .... so who am I to know any better.
Thanks for sharing my brother.