Comments

• 

  Roaring Lovely February 29, 2016 at 4:35pm

  Increadibly beautifull! Thats why I love plasma. I wonder what happen if superfluidity is combined with superconductivity. But I think such happens in 'empty space'. The math of higgs field is much like that of superconducture and I think matter-antimatter potential, given zero point energy is a kinda plasma.
  
  I am now thinking about plasma sheats and celulisation in plasma. It is in this way that plasma self organises like leaving things. It is these plasma sheaths that can form toruses or spheres such as heliospheres and arrange the universe into huge shells. But I want to see more in the superconducting 'virtual plasma' in the matter-antimatter potential. Here, the celulations will surely creat fearies.:)
  
  I did not understand what you mean by the question about different shapes of toruses. Can you reframe the question?
• 

  Feather Winger February 29, 2016 at 12:33pm

  Electrical charged super fluid plasma...

  
• 

  Feather Winger February 29, 2016 at 9:35am

  I´m going on the idea of as above so below for the shape of the electro-magnetic energy field. Can torus be different shapes...  If it was a more flat spiral, would the torus be the same shape?? Perhaps in different universe there are different shapes, different  physic, different math  for they have a different template and not the Flower of Life.

  
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 29, 2016 at 9:03am

  I keep saying the universe is arranged in huge spheres, but toruses can serve the same purposes. Yea there are good reason to consider toruses and also the 'snail shell' type shapes. (let me look for the proper name).
  
  Good idea, Wings, where exactly will we ever meet, for a cup of coffee, and also a couple of hugs.?:)
• 

  Feather Winger February 29, 2016 at 6:40am

  The universe is closed in that the torus is the boundary, but it is infinite in a fractal way....getting fractally smaller within a limited space.  There are12 of these universes and right now a new one is being formed.  I would guess that all these uiverses connect and that the multi-verse is infinite in its possibilities.  Would like to meet for a cup of tea somewhere and watch this new universe being formed....I will watch the colors and you could check the math.....
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2016 at 7:22pm

  Since we tend to think that the total number of particles in the universe is infinite, my formula for G as psf/u^2 may seem paradoxical. However it is, in nature, the same as Olber's Paradox. So I can steal any resolution to Olber's Paradox and apply it here. But I use mine, which organizes the universe into giant spheres that does not directly interact with each other. Btw a closely similar question bedeviled Newton himself. He was often told that in an infinite universe, the gravity from all the stars should sum up so that every object experiences infinit force from all sides! Newton was unable to answer the question. Latter, a similar question led Einstein to beleif in a closed universe. But you can also use the plausible reasoning that as p increases without bound, both f and s approaches zero. So we keep multiplying a very very huge number with a number that is almost zero.
  
  Honestly, I can't calculate how many particles are there as I have 3 unknowns in the single equation. I tend to beleive that the particles are photons spinning at the speed of light.
  
  Also if you understand the strings as Birkland like robes radiating from a spinning photon, then the force f will be just how the strings are screwing the photons in, or something like that. So yes, like you said, Birkland currents are good candidates for panconnection.
• 

  Feather Winger February 28, 2016 at 5:26pm

  The math sure worked out on that one..

  how many particles are in the universe, ...what are these particles...???
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2016 at 1:49pm

  I can go on to explain entropy and quantum entanglement, but I won't do it here.:) I think that one of gravity is enough to convince you that panconnection is indead a reality, not just a wishfull thought.
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2016 at 1:43pm

  Notice that I did not explain gravity. I was waiting for someone like wings to comment.:)
  
  Now, each and every particle has strings that radiates to touch all the other particles in the rest of the universe. If there are n particles making up the earth and p particles in the rest of the universe, each of the n particles will have p strings radiating away. So there are a total of np strings radiating out of the earth to the rest of the universe. Each string exerts a force f on any particle it comes in touch with. Lets say each particle occupys an area of s. Then the area of the 'moon' will be A=qs. Where q is the number of particles in the 'moon'. Let r be the distance from earth to 'moon', then the surface area of the sphere or radius r is 4Pr^2. Where P is pie (not to be confused with p). So at the region of the 'moon', the number of strings radiating out per given area is np/4Pr^2. So the total number of strings crossing the 'moon' is S= Anp/4Pr^2=qsnp/4Pr^2. Since each string exerts a force f, the total force, F on the 'moon' will be F=fS=fqsnp/4Pr^2. Remember than n is the number of particles on earth. If each of those particles have mass u, then the mass of the earth, M is M=nu or n=M/u. Similarly, since q is the number of particles in 'moon' and m (not M) is the mass of the 'moon', then q=m/u. Punch this to the force formular and you get F=Mmfsp/(u^2)4Pr^2, which is Newton's law of gravity provided that you let the gravitantional constant, G be given by G=fsp/u^2. That is G in this theory depends on the total number of particles in the universe.
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2016 at 12:03pm

  I like working with the body's Birkman currents.:)