Measure

Ever since the days of Galileo, 'measurement' has barrowed its way into becoming an important ritual in the temple of science. When we talk of measurement, many have in mind the act of gazing at some apparatus and then spitting out some number. However, such is not the true essence of the philosophy of measurement. Essentially, measurement mean just comparison. It is this misunderstanding of measurement that has lead to unhealthy distinction of what is falsely labled 'subjective' vs 'objective'. Actually, either everything is measurable or nothing is measurable.The human mind is capable of distinguishing three things: A is bigger than B, B is bigger than A, A is as big as B. This is essentially what we do even when we measure using a ruler. We keep saying oh, the book is longer than the 2cm mark, it is longer than 3cm mark, it is longer than the 4cm mark, it is shorter than the 8cm mark, it is equal to 6 cm mark. Due to experience, we do this so fast that we rarely think about what we are doing. That is why I often wish that we remain kindagarteners in some things. If we cannot simply tell whether a thing is simply bigger than, smaller than or equal to another thing, then we cannot even measure with a ruler. So every time you see someone trying to know if a table inside a house is perharps bigger than the house by taking some measurement using a ruler, then you know at once that you are dealing with an idiot.MEASUREMENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH NUMBERS!!A good example of measurement is the one done by shop keepers using beam balance. You more or less take some sexy stone by the river side and then you keep balancing it with the potatoes etc on the right. The shop keeper hardly need even to know 1 1=2 to do this. He only need sharp eyes. Numbers along a scale is empty lables only neaded to help in remembering what the thing was equal to in size! Thanks to the fact that we have memorised the sequence. We could have placed variety of colors along the scale or cards such as kick back and joker etc. Only that they are toucher to remember for most of us. Remember that when in kindagarten, we absolutely neaded numbers along the circumfrence of the clock. As we get used to the clock, we begine to include only 12, 9,6&3. Then we begun to drop numbers all together and leave only marks. Eventualy, we did away with even the marks and made a clock with only pointers in a plain 'scale'!!PHYSICS MEASUREMENTSActually, they should be better terme 'Galilean physics measurdments'. In healthy physics, we mean 'physical' and we incooperate everything ditectable including smells, tests colors etc. In galiliean physics, we ultimately measure something by forcing it to fit in a scale. This gives impression that such things as smells are imeasurable in themselves but only due to the fact that we can convert them to some motions. This is a terrible error! As long as we can distinguish the smell of iodine from that of say an orange, we say that in principle, smells are measurable in themselves without theorising that they are reducable to some motions.Mathematical physics has fooled us into thinking that there is such a thing in narture as a measure of a thing as in some standard. There is non! A standard is an arbitrary choice made by the profesors. A good illustration of the conundrum is this ambiquitos term we call 'mass'. At one moment, it is the quantity of matter. So we might say that one kilogram is the mass of such and such volume of water. So when we are talking of the mass of a stone, it is tempting to say that we are trying to figure out how much volume of water do we need to compress it to become of the same volume of the stone and of equal 'hardness'. But then we realise that 'hardness' is not the same thing as density, for instance water anomolously expand to become harder! We opt to use a beam balance. But then we realise that energy content of the thing affects gravity. THERE IS REALY NO SUCH A THING AS QUANTITY OF MATTER!! Matter is unquantifyable!!QUANTUM MEASUREMENTThis is just to extend the absurdity of trying to look for a measure of a thing. Even the physicists came to understand that there is a limit of such. The best way I may illustrate to you is using a drop of oil. We are trying to measure its diameter. Initially, it is almost perfectly spherical. However, you realise that fluid drops are highly adhesive and they will quickly get distorted if they get near to your ruler. So the simple act of measuring the length of something must always change that length! In classic world, we can savely niclect such. But even an hardly visible expansion is a couple of atoms longer. In quantum world, it is a behemoth eror!People think that quantum mechanics is talking of some voodoo happening between the conscious observation and the quantum world. Thats funny, how can we observe atoms? Can we observe something of length 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001mitres? worse is when they think that physicists are talking of something applicable in classic world. But it is quite easy to prove that there is no quantum effects in classic world. Just stare at your bag, then look somewhere else, then look back at your bag. I bet you can keep observing your bag and yet it will seat squarely on the same spot. I mean even if you want some cheap lift to the airport, you won't get it, not by merely observing it! But the reason is pretty simple: the cow is composed of horns, eyes, tail, head, legs etc. The legs would wanna go to andromeda when you observe, the nose wanna quantum jump to sirius, the head wanna wave to the moon etc. Eventualy the cancel each other. Too bad for the magician, too good for the cow. The bottom line is that if quantum effects were there in our world, the world would be utterly useless.

The pedo-blackmailed and bribed acting troupe that pretends to be the US government just bought itself a little more than a week’s survival time by means of outright crime. The Rothschild/Rockefeller owners of the US Corporation did this by fooling…

"Ah yes, that link is the source material for the video, which I provided to my friends at "Family of Light" to post, on my behalf, on YouTube, back in 2015...If you look on the cover image, it has both my logo, as well as that of FOL......Those guys…"

"Gulf Breeze sighting back in 1992. Communication between those on the ground and the crafts was made here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp0BaS21r68"

Spiritual Blogs

Measure

Comments

Featured Blogs

Calm In The Midst Of The Storm

Book: ASHTAR – A Tribute Compiled by Tuella

The Fiery Forces Of Creation Are Sweeping The Earth - June 22th, 2022

Interdimensional Being: Where Do You Consciously Reside?

Note: this page contains paid content.

Latest Activity

New Forum Posts

How To See A Miracle In Your Life

The Dark Origins of the Davos’ Great Reset

A collective “common enemy” now stalks mankind

All About Billy Meier and the Plejaren

Note: this page contains paid content.